Re: Revert Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917 (was: Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!)

2019-03-01 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi Anton, thank you for taking this on and getting it resolved. It is appreciated. Greetings Matthias Am Freitag, den 22.02.2019, 11:33 +0100 schrieb Anton Epple: > Hi Guys, > > I'm sorry for the long silence, I simply completely missed the whole > communication due to my Email settings.

Re: Revert Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917 (was: Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!)

2019-02-22 Thread Anton Epple
Hi Guys, I'm sorry for the long silence, I simply completely missed the whole communication due to my Email settings. Jarda has contacted me and I'll try to catchup this weekend. --Toni Am 22.02.19, 09:56 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach" : Thanks for the mailing list heads-up! I talked to

Re: Revert Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917 (was: Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!)

2019-02-22 Thread Jaroslav Tulach
Thanks for the mailing list heads-up! I talked to Toni and explained that 20 days silence in an issue resolution is undesirable. Hopefully a way to avoid that in the future has been agreed upon. PR-1143 seems to resolve the licensing problem, so I've just merged it. -jt st 20. 2. 2019 v 4:46

Re: Revert Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917 (was: Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!)

2019-02-19 Thread Jaroslav Tulach
-1 (e.g. veto) to the revert proposal. Dne středa 20. února 2019 1:03:36 CET, Matthias Bläsing napsal(a): > Hello all, > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Matthias Bläsing: > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 10:44 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > > BTW, as we are not really