[GitHub] JaroslavTulach opened a new pull request #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits

JaroslavTulach opened a new pull request #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/182 Updating the Maven co-ordinates of HTML/Java API to point to recently released 1.5 bits. The 1.5 bits are licensed under Apache license - e.g.

[GitHub] junichi11 commented on issue #163: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review maven.indexer

junichi11 commented on issue #163: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review maven.indexer URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/163#issuecomment-338887894 I've sorted rat excludes. (This PR already had the conflicting file(nbbuild/build.xml))

[GitHub] junichi11 commented on issue #129: Sort rat excludes alphabetically

junichi11 commented on issue #129: Sort rat excludes alphabetically URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/129#issuecomment-338883612 I'll merge soon. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

[GitHub] arusinha opened a new pull request #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo

arusinha opened a new pull request #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/184 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] arusinha opened a new pull request #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.script

arusinha opened a new pull request #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.script URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/185 Added license file for external resource net.java.html.boot.script-1.4.jar

Re: Contributor

If you're a committer, you already have access to the repo. Since we have GitBox integration, you can do pull requests from GitHub, if you set it up: https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > Hi, > > as I’m in as a

[GitHub] arusinha opened a new pull request #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.fx

arusinha opened a new pull request #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.fx URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/186 Added license file for external resource net.java.html.boot.fx-1.4.jar

[GitHub] geertjanw opened a new pull request #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data to Rat exceptions

geertjanw opened a new pull request #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data to Rat exceptions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/187 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] arusinha opened a new pull request #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot

arusinha opened a new pull request #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/188 Added license file for external resource net.java.html.boot-1.4.jar This is

[GitHub] vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver

vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-338942929 You need a command-line "patch" program. I'm not sure how to install int in Windows (I don't use Windows myself).

[GitHub] arusinha opened a new pull request #183: Added license file for external resource net.java.html-1.4.jar

arusinha opened a new pull request #183: Added license file for external resource net.java.html-1.4.jar URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] vikasprabhakar opened a new pull request #189: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review web.browser.api

vikasprabhakar opened a new pull request #189: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review web.browser.api URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/189 Added license header for webpreview.wsmode This is an automated message

AW: Contributor

Ok so I got a mail from asfgit: You are now a member of The Apache Software Foundation! But can’t see me in the list of the contributor of incubator-netbeans. I will create a Feature/test soon to test it, whether I have acces or not. Thx. Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Geertjan

[GitHub] arusinha commented on issue #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html

arusinha commented on issue #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183#issuecomment-338957738 Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same This

[GitHub] arusinha closed pull request #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html

arusinha closed pull request #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As this is a

Re: Contributor

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Christian Lenz wrote: > I wasn’t added to this list: https://github.com/apache/ > incubator-netbeans/graphs/contributors That shows you who has committed to Apache NetBeans so far. Do a pull request (i.e., do a Module Review) and when

[GitHub] arusinha commented on issue #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot

arusinha commented on issue #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/188#issuecomment-338958063 Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same

Re: Question regarding licensing and 2nd donation

Anything Java EE related is going to be part of EE4J, i.e., Eclipse licensed, which is fine from Apache's perspective, i.e., so long as something is not GPL(+something), Apache is OK with it. Maybe I've simplified things too much, but it appears like this. Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:42 PM,

[GitHub] jlahoda commented on issue #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html

jlahoda commented on issue #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183#issuecomment-338953182 I am sorry, but Jarda sent a pull request this morning changing the Html4J binaries for version 1.5, which is Apache licensed. I am

Build fails without "patch" tool

Hi all, The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1]) AFAIK all the build system requires little external tools. Are we ready for requiring an external "patch" command or should we roll back that change? Thanks Antonio [1]

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #168: adding insane dependency for tests in keyring.fallback

geertjanw commented on issue #168: adding insane dependency for tests in keyring.fallback URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/168#issuecomment-338957182 Nice, thanks. This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] geertjanw closed pull request #168: adding insane dependency for tests in keyring.fallback

geertjanw closed pull request #168: adding insane dependency for tests in keyring.fallback URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/168 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of

[GitHub] sarveshkesharwani commented on issue #168: adding insane dependency for tests in keyring.fallback

sarveshkesharwani commented on issue #168: adding insane dependency for tests in keyring.fallback URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/168#issuecomment-338957056 This fixes the failing tests in "MasterPasswordEncryptionTest.java" and "FallbackProviderTest.java" in the

[GitHub] arusinha commented on issue #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo

arusinha commented on issue #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/184#issuecomment-338957833 Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same

[GitHub] arusinha commented on issue #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.script

arusinha commented on issue #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.script URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/185#issuecomment-338957892 Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same

[GitHub] arusinha closed pull request #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.script

arusinha closed pull request #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.script URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/185 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance:

[GitHub] arusinha closed pull request #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo

arusinha closed pull request #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/184 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As

[GitHub] arusinha closed pull request #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot

arusinha closed pull request #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/188 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As

[GitHub] arusinha commented on issue #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.fx

arusinha commented on issue #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.fx URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/186#issuecomment-338957969 Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same

[GitHub] arusinha closed pull request #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.fx

arusinha closed pull request #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot.fx URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/186 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As

Question regarding licensing and 2nd donation

Hi, Maybe this is not the right channel but in the WildFly plugin I use schema2beans to produce configuration beans. Current JBoss/WildFly schemas extend J2EE/ JavaEE ones which were licensed by Sun/ Oracle under LGPL. Red Hatr would consider moving to ASL2 those schemas but since they are

Re: Build fails without "patch" tool

Btw. The diff module & co. contain code to apply a patch. The code is used in the IDE. -jt 2017-10-24 13:10 GMT+02:00 Antonio Vieiro : > Hi all, > > The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1]) > > AFAIK all the build system requires little

[mentors] Apache Release 1.5 of HTML/Java API is approved - what is next?

2017-10-23 15:00 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Tulach : > Hi. > The source release is approved. The source ZIP and associated files are > currently at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/ > shall we upload them somewhere else? > Dear mentors, I'd like to

[GitHub] arusinha opened a new pull request #190: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.commons.io

arusinha opened a new pull request #190: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.commons.io URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/190 Added maven coordinate for external resource commons-io-1.4.jar This is an

Android support analysis

Hi, I contacted Radim Kubacki author of the NBANDROID project. According to his words, it has nomotivationto continue development. (last commit is from 2015) But he has nothing against that the community will continue to develop the project and that it could part of Apache netbeans. NBANDROID

AW: Android support analysis

Wow, thats cool  There is a Long discussion with gaurap gupta, founder of the Jeddict plugin former as JPA modeler: https://twitter.com/jgauravgupta/status/743659073317396480. He already started a Android modeler, maybe we can extends it? Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: arsi Gesendet:

Re: Android support analysis

Excellent news! Maybe you could consider making an android branch of Apache NetBeans, just like these: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/branches So that others can collaborate with you on your work? I.e., this would be a new feature branch. Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:02 PM,

AW: Android support analysis

Here is the source: https://twitter.com/jgauravgupta/status/743659073317396480 It is based on JFludion I think. Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: arsi Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 14:03 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff: Android support analysis Hi, I contacted Radim

Re: [mentors] Apache Release 1.5 of HTML/Java API is approved - what is next?

The word "shall" should be "should" here -- i.e., the question to mentors is do we need to upload somewhere the release to complete it? Or is it complete right now? Thanks, Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > 2017-10-23 15:00 GMT+02:00

AW: Android support analysis

I think first we should treat it like a plugin as it is atm, as you already said. It can moved to github first and we can create tickets and PRs etc. Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Christian Lenz Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 14:17 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff:

Re: Contributor

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Christian Lenz wrote: > Ok so I got a mail from asfgit: You are now a member of The Apache > Software Foundation! > > But can’t see me in the list of the contributor of incubator-netbeans. And you will never see yourself as a

Re: Support for (Java) Pattern Matching

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > I'd like to provide some mentor guidance to this discussion. > Many thanks for these insights! I think we all should read the below a few times, mainly from the perspective of how to think about what we're doing at Apache and

Re: Contributor

Here's a 3 minute overview of what's needed to be done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4PBNSRp5g8 Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Christian Lenz > wrote: > >> Ok so

Re: Android support analysis

Hi, I think it should be a separate repository. I started under NB81, where Radim ended. As I wrote it should first be stabilized under NB 81/82 as plugin. And after all my life I work with hg, git kills me ;) Arsi

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data to Rat exceptions

geertjanw commented on issue #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data to Rat exceptions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/187#issuecomment-338976315 OK, these updates are modifications to the existing Rat exclusions, and a simplification of part of it, only

[GitHub] geertjanw closed pull request #178: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review schema2beans

geertjanw closed pull request #178: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review schema2beans URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/178 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As this is a

[GitHub] geertjanw closed pull request #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data to Rat exceptions

geertjanw closed pull request #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data to Rat exceptions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/187 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of

[GitHub] geertjanw closed pull request #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits

geertjanw closed pull request #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/182 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As this is a foreign

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits

geertjanw commented on issue #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/182#issuecomment-338977529 Makes sense, thanks, merging. This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: Android support analysis

And I think it would be best if Radim Kubacki himself would commit those sources to the Android branch of Apache NetBeans, since he is the author of that code. Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > A problem is that, while Apache

Re: Android support analysis

Hi, Radim wrote that he does not want to solve any administration.. I can send you my communication with Radim, but it is Czech and Slovak.. I made one maven module,because it will often need to change versions of android dependencies. And it needs to be cleaned. (Old Ant Android support)

Re: Android support analysis

Hi, OKwe can move it there.. but I do not know how to do it.. The sources are here: http://server.arsi.sk/Gradle-Android-support.tar.gz Arsi *From:* Geertjan Wielenga *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 2:50PM *To:*

Re: Build fails without "patch" tool

Even simpler: let’s keep the files themselves and the patch (for reference), and let’s compile the files! ;-) > El 24 oct 2017, a las 13:48, Jaroslav Tulach > escribió: > > Btw. The diff module & co. contain code to apply a patch. The code is used > in the IDE. >

Module review - yet another helper

Hi I would like to help out with the last bits of the module review. I see there are still a few modules without names on them (servletapi,swing.validation, etc). I'll grab those and get right on it. I'll need Confluence edit rights. My Confluence id: lbruun Thanks Lars

AW: Android support analysis

Ok, thx. Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Geertjan Wielenga Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 16:20 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: Android support analysis Yup. In the case of Android, it would be really cool to have it directly inside NetBeans, at some point.

Re: Android support analysis

You're absolutely right, Chris. However, the problem comes in if many of us will want to work together on the Android support, i.e., if we'll want to collaborate on this feature, and if we want it to be part of Apache NetBeans itself. That's when it will be applicable that we'll have a branch,

[GitHub] bolsover commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver

bolsover commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339001084 I'll quite happily do some testing... Where do I get the 'patch' utility?

AW: Android support analysis

But we can work together on the 3rd-party-plugin anyway. Of Course, if the plan is still having it right inside NetBeans core from the beginning ok, but I think this was done with Twig and Git before it went to the NetBeans repo after a specific period. NBTS, could be part of NetBeans too one

Re: Android support analysis

Yup. In the case of Android, it would be really cool to have it directly inside NetBeans, at some point. Initial development elsewhere is fine until then, of course. Gj On Tuesday, October 24, 2017, Christian Lenz wrote: > But we can work together on the

Re: Android support analysis

Right, good point. Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:50 PM, arsi wrote: > Hi, > > And one more thing. First, we need to integrate the Gradle support plugin > from Attila Kelemen. > NBANDROID is extension of Gradle support plugin. > > Arsi > > >

Re: Apache NetBeans Blog

How can we create an account there? On 24 October 2017 at 16:08, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Note that we have a community blog in which everyone can blog about their > usage/development of Apache NetBeans: > > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/ > >

Re: Android support analysis

A problem is that, while Apache NetBeans is built on Ant, the sources you have provided build via Maven. Not sure what the right approach should be. Maybe the source structure should be in Ant, if it's going to be part of Apache NetBeans? (I don't see NetBeans moving to Maven very soon.) Gj On

Re: Apache NetBeans Blog

You need to be a committer to Apache NetBeans first, i.e., you need to have an Apache ID, which means you not only need to have sent in your iCLA, but you also need to have been invited to become a committer, by the existing committers. We'll start doing that once the Module Review is done, I

Re: Android support analysis

OK, I have created an 'android' branch: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/branches Are you sure we're able to simply take the content of that tar.gz and put it into the android branch? I.e., these files are (or can be) licensed to Apache? Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:27 PM, arsi

AW: Android support analysis

What is the Problem of having a 3rd-party-plugin, which is not yet inside of the NetBeans core, but has licensed as Apache 2? No one can test the state of the plugin, until you clone the whole source of NetBeans, build it and try the plugin inside of it? Since when we are against

Re: Android support analysis

Sure, though be aware that stabilizing and cleaning up can be done at Apache too. On the other hand, as long as the code is based on Maven, it can't be integrated into Apache NetBeans, since it is built on Ant. Developing it in a separate GitHub repo until you decide that others can collaborate

Re: Android support analysis

Hi, After end of the first phase, I'll put it back under the Ant. Arsi *From:* Geertjan Wielenga *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 4:44PM *To:* Dev *Subject:* Re: Android support analysis Sure, though be aware that

Integrating with complex third-party software

I’m currently reviewing one of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules and I can’t find a binary, so I should either upgrade or downgrade it. I was wondering if we should either upgrade or downgrade the binaries of _all_ of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules at once. In order to avoid subtle bugs that may

[GitHub] matthiasblaesing commented on issue #169: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.commons.httpclient

matthiasblaesing commented on issue #169: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.commons.httpclient URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/169#issuecomment-339061437 I pushed the commit to master. This PR is still a bit strange. For some reason you managed to push three

[GitHub] vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver

vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339065700 We'll either: 1- Add the complete source files to avoid patching (I'm worried about licensing issues here). 2-

Re: Question regarding licensing and 2nd donation

I believe so, yes. Gj On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM, ehsavoie wrote: > Ok even old dtds and schemas ? > That would be great :) > Emmanuel > > -- > Emmanuel Hugonnet > http://www.ehsavoie.com > http://twitter.com/ehsavoie > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:44

[GitHub] juneau001 commented on issue #117: [NETBEANS-54] Modeule Review j2ee.persistence

juneau001 commented on issue #117: [NETBEANS-54] Modeule Review j2ee.persistence URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117#issuecomment-339047664 Thanks @geertjanw we ran into an issue with this package due to a ZIP file containing additional files requiring license

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #181: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.osgi (followup)

geertjanw commented on issue #181: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.osgi (followup) URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/181#issuecomment-339060565 Thanks for the info, will investigate. This is an

Re: Apache NetBeans Blog

> El 24 oct 2017, a las 17:12, Geertjan Wielenga > escribió: > > You need to be a committer to Apache NetBeans first, i.e., you need to have > an Apache ID, which means you not only need to have sent in your iCLA, but > you also need to have been invited to

Re: Question regarding licensing and 2nd donation

Ok even old dtds and schemas ? That would be great :) Emmanuel -- Emmanuel Hugonnet http://www.ehsavoie.com http://twitter.com/ehsavoie On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Anything Java EE related is going to be part of EE4J,

[GitHub] lbruun opened a new pull request #191: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review swing.validation

lbruun opened a new pull request #191: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review swing.validation URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/191 Project includes `ValidationAPI.jar` (CDDL licensed), originally hosted on Kenai, now GitHub. Changed dead references to Kenai to their

Re: [mentors] Apache Release 1.5 of HTML/Java API is approved - what is next?

On 2017-10-24 21:05, Ate Douma wrote: On 2017-10-24 14:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: The word "shall" should be "should" here -- i.e., the question to mentors is do we need to upload somewhere the release to complete it? Or is it complete right now? The ASF policy and documentation for

[GitHub] vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver

vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339110849 All source is Apache 2 licensed, so no worries regarding point 1. See #192 for a fix.

[GitHub] matthiasblaesing commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver

matthiasblaesing commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339115637 Another approach (java based patching):

Re: Integrating with complex third-party software

Hey, Am Dienstag, den 24.10.2017, 19:35 +0200 schrieb Antonio Vieiro: > I’m currently reviewing one of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules and I > can’t find a binary, so I should either upgrade or downgrade it. > > I was wondering if we should either upgrade or downgrade the binaries > of _all_ of

[GitHub] vieiro opened a new pull request #192: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver (Build fails on sys?

vieiro opened a new pull request #192: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.xml.resolver (Build fails on sys? URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/192 Build fails on systems without the 'patch' command line tool. - The ant 'patch' task requires an external

Gradle

Hi! Geertjan asked me if I could move my Gradle plugin to be part of NetBeans. I would gladly do that but there are some problems to overcome as I don't know the Ant build of NB at all. Currently the Gradle plugin is built with Gradle (suprise, surprise) and does the following non-trivial things:

Re: Build fails without "patch" tool

Hey all, Am Dienstag, den 24.10.2017, 13:48 +0200 schrieb Jaroslav Tulach: > Btw. The diff module & co. contain code to apply a patch. The code is > used in the IDE. > > > 2017-10-24 13:10 GMT+02:00 Antonio Vieiro : > > > The build fails if "patch" is not available on the

Re: Integrating with complex third-party software

Hi, I've been trying to find something similar to Wildfly BOMs [1] in the eclipse nexus repository without success. Maybe they don't have them. I'd like to see a well defined set of module versions (o.eclipse.core.net X.Y.Z, o.eclipse.core.runtime A.B.C, etc.), that are tested to work

Re: Integrating with complex third-party software

Long story short: Eclipse is currently working in publishing to Maven central ([1], [2]). They’ve released some preliminar tests in Maven central as of 2017/10/17 ([3, 4]), this is, a few days back. (Their target milestone for this is 4.6.2, but they’re currently @ 4.7, so I imagine they’re