That is a sane sugestion. +1
Le 01/03/2017 à 00:20, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose a two-phased code donation -- the first for all the
> parts necessary for building a Java SE distribution of NetBeans IDE and the
> second for all the other parts.
>
> I.e., the first
Hi all,
I'd like to propose a two-phased code donation -- the first for all the
parts necessary for building a Java SE distribution of NetBeans IDE and the
second for all the other parts.
I.e., the first code donation would be 5a-d in the link below and the
second code donation would be 5e-f in t
Sounds great! Congrat!
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It was really great at DevNexus last week:
>
> 1. DevNexus donated a Silver Sponsorship to NetBeans, in support of our
> move to Apache. Thanks again DevNexus!
>
> 2.
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 05:17, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 27/02/2017 à 17:17, Wade Chandler a écrit :
>> I think it already does mean something. Contributors have the right to
>> actually vote, where as someone sending a patch doesn’t.
>
> Actually, no.
>
> Of course, everyone can vo
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Neil C Smith
wrote:
> ...Slack is also transient and a larger community can quickly get to a
> point where the archive only lasts a few weeks...
And even if the archive is permanent that doesn't help much for
jumping late into a discussion that started a few days
Le 27/02/2017 à 18:38, Neil C Smith a écrit :
> On 27 February 2017 at 16:02, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> My (own, unwritten) rule in Apache projects is to move things to the
>> dev list as soon as they go beyond the level of a coffee machine
>> discussion - and when they do, restart the dis
On 28 February 2017 at 08:56, Timon Veenstra wrote:
>> Conversations like on slack usually don't make good documentation
> Transferring this common practice, when someone says something worth
> remembering on slack, we put it on the wiki (or issue tracker when its bug
> related).
I'm not sur
Le 27/02/2017 à 17:17, Wade Chandler a écrit :
> I think it already does mean something. Contributors have the right to
> actually vote, where as someone sending a patch doesn’t.
Actually, no.
Of course, everyone can vote, but some votes are binding votes, when
others are just informative.
Ty
>
>
> things might get lost that are important without us realising,
> particularly in channels other than #general. Whether the solution is
> logging or another similar service with better archiving, I don't
> know. I do think it's a communication medium that ends up being used
> in a way that's
