Long story short: Eclipse is currently working in publishing to Maven central
([1], [2]). They’ve released some preliminar tests in Maven central as of
2017/10/17 ([3, 4]), this is, a few days back.
(Their target milestone for this is 4.6.2, but they’re currently @ 4.7, so I
imagine they’re lat
Hi!
Geertjan asked me if I could move my Gradle plugin to be part of NetBeans.
I would gladly do that but there are some problems to overcome as I don't
know the Ant build of NB at all. Currently the Gradle plugin is built with
Gradle (suprise, surprise) and does the following non-trivial things:
Hi,
I've been trying to find something similar to Wildfly BOMs [1] in the
eclipse nexus repository without success. Maybe they don't have them.
I'd like to see a well defined set of module versions
(o.eclipse.core.net X.Y.Z, o.eclipse.core.runtime A.B.C, etc.), that are
tested to work togethe
matthiasblaesing commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339115637
Another approach (java based patching):
https://github.com/matthiasblaesing/incubator-netbeans/tree/build-java-patc
Hey all,
Am Dienstag, den 24.10.2017, 13:48 +0200 schrieb Jaroslav Tulach:
> Btw. The diff module & co. contain code to apply a patch. The code is
> used in the IDE.
>
>
> 2017-10-24 13:10 GMT+02:00 Antonio Vieiro :
>
> > The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1])
matthiasblaesing commented on issue #192: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver (Build fails on sys?
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/192#issuecomment-339111091
Please wait with this. I'm currently looking into a java based patching
solution. This won't b
vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339110849
All source is Apache 2 licensed, so no worries regarding point 1.
See #192 for a fix.
vieiro opened a new pull request #192: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver (Build fails on sys?
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/192
Build fails on systems without the 'patch' command line tool.
- The ant 'patch' task requires an external 'patch'
Hey,
Am Dienstag, den 24.10.2017, 19:35 +0200 schrieb Antonio Vieiro:
> I’m currently reviewing one of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules and I
> can’t find a binary, so I should either upgrade or downgrade it.
>
> I was wondering if we should either upgrade or downgrade the binaries
> of _all_ of th
On 2017-10-24 21:05, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2017-10-24 14:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
The word "shall" should be "should" here -- i.e., the question to mentors
is do we need to upload somewhere the release to complete it? Or is it
complete right now?
The ASF policy and documentation for rele
On 2017-10-24 14:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
The word "shall" should be "should" here -- i.e., the question to mentors
is do we need to upload somewhere the release to complete it? Or is it
complete right now?
The ASF policy and documentation for releases:
http://www.apache.org/dev/#releas
lbruun opened a new pull request #191: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
swing.validation
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/191
Project includes `ValidationAPI.jar` (CDDL licensed), originally hosted on
Kenai, now GitHub.
Changed dead references to Kenai to their equivale
> El 24 oct 2017, a las 17:12, Geertjan Wielenga
> escribió:
>
> You need to be a committer to Apache NetBeans first, i.e., you need to have
> an Apache ID, which means you not only need to have sent in your iCLA, but
> you also need to have been invited to become a committer, by the existing
I’m currently reviewing one of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules and I can’t find
a binary, so I should either upgrade or downgrade it.
I was wondering if we should either upgrade or downgrade the binaries of _all_
of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules at once. In order to avoid subtle bugs that
may a
vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339065700
We'll either:
1- Add the complete source files to avoid patching (I'm worried about
licensing issues here).
2- Buil
matthiasblaesing commented on issue #169: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.commons.httpclient
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/169#issuecomment-339061437
I pushed the commit to master. This PR is still a bit strange. For some
reason you managed to push three comm
geertjanw commented on issue #181: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.osgi
(followup)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/181#issuecomment-339060565
Thanks for the info, will investigate.
This is an automate
asfgit closed pull request #169: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.commons.httpclient
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/169
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
juneau001 commented on issue #117: [NETBEANS-54] Modeule Review j2ee.persistence
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117#issuecomment-339047664
Thanks @geertjanw we ran into an issue with this package due to a ZIP file
containing additional files requiring license update
I believe so, yes.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM, ehsavoie
wrote:
> Ok even old dtds and schemas ?
> That would be great :)
> Emmanuel
>
> --
> Emmanuel Hugonnet
> http://www.ehsavoie.com
> http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geer
Ok even old dtds and schemas ?
That would be great :)
Emmanuel
--
Emmanuel Hugonnet
http://www.ehsavoie.com
http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Anything Java EE related is going to be part of EE4J, i.
You need to be a committer to Apache NetBeans first, i.e., you need to have
an Apache ID, which means you not only need to have sent in your iCLA, but
you also need to have been invited to become a committer, by the existing
committers.
We'll start doing that once the Module Review is done, I thin
How can we create an account there?
On 24 October 2017 at 16:08, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Note that we have a community blog in which everyone can blog about their
> usage/development of Apache NetBeans:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/
>
>
Hi,
After end of the first phase, I'll put it back under the Ant.
Arsi
*From:* Geertjan Wielenga
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 4:44PM
*To:* Dev
*Subject:* Re: Android support analysis
Sure, though be aware that st
Right, good point.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:50 PM, arsi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And one more thing. First, we need to integrate the Gradle support plugin
> from Attila Kelemen.
> NBANDROID is extension of Gradle support plugin.
>
> Arsi
>
>
> ---
Hi,
And one more thing. First, we need to integrate the Gradle support
plugin from Attila Kelemen.
NBANDROID is extension of Gradle support plugin.
Arsi
*From:* Arsi
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 4:26PM
*To:* Dev
*
Sure, though be aware that stabilizing and cleaning up can be done at
Apache too.
On the other hand, as long as the code is based on Maven, it can't be
integrated into Apache NetBeans, since it is built on Ant.
Developing it in a separate GitHub repo until you decide that others can
collaborate w
Hi,
Radim wrote that he does not want to solve any administration..
I can send you my communication with Radim, but it is Czech and Slovak..
I made one maven module,because it will often need to change versions of
android dependencies.
And it needs to be cleaned. (Old Ant Android support)
Ple
Ok, thx.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 16:20
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Android support analysis
Yup.
In the case of Android, it would be really cool to have it directly inside
NetBeans, at some point. Initia
Yup.
In the case of Android, it would be really cool to have it directly inside
NetBeans, at some point. Initial development elsewhere is fine until then,
of course.
Gj
On Tuesday, October 24, 2017, Christian Lenz wrote:
> But we can work together on the 3rd-party-plugin anyway. Of Course, if
But we can work together on the 3rd-party-plugin anyway. Of Course, if the plan
is still having it right inside NetBeans core from the beginning ok, but I
think this was done with Twig and Git before it went to the NetBeans repo after
a specific period. NBTS, could be part of NetBeans too one da
geertjanw commented on issue #117: [NETBEANS-54] Modeule Review j2ee.persistence
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117#issuecomment-339002802
I see about 15 files in j2ee.persistence that have problematic license
headers (or none) of some kind:
https://builds.apache.o
bolsover commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-339001084
I'll quite happily do some testing...
Where do I get the 'patch' utility?
--
You're absolutely right, Chris.
However, the problem comes in if many of us will want to work together on
the Android support, i.e., if we'll want to collaborate on this feature,
and if we want it to be part of Apache NetBeans itself. That's when it will
be applicable that we'll have a branch, etc
What is the Problem of having a 3rd-party-plugin, which is not yet inside of
the NetBeans core, but has licensed as Apache 2? No one can test the state of
the plugin, until you clone the whole source of NetBeans, build it and try the
plugin inside of it? Since when we are against 3rd-party-plugi
Thanks, excellent, and done.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Lars Bruun-Hansen
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to help out with the last bits of the module review. I see
> there are still a few modules without names on them
> (servletapi,swing.validation, etc). I'll grab those and get right on
Hi
I would like to help out with the last bits of the module review. I see
there are still a few modules without names on them
(servletapi,swing.validation, etc). I'll grab those and get right on it.
I'll need Confluence edit rights. My Confluence id: lbruun
Thanks
Lars
And I think it would be best if Radim Kubacki himself would commit those
sources to the Android branch of Apache NetBeans, since he is the author of
that code.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> A problem is that, while Apache NetBe
A problem is that, while Apache NetBeans is built on Ant, the sources you
have provided build via Maven.
Not sure what the right approach should be. Maybe the source structure
should be in Ant, if it's going to be part of Apache NetBeans?
(I don't see NetBeans moving to Maven very soon.)
Gj
On
Even simpler: let’s keep the files themselves and the patch (for reference),
and let’s compile the files! ;-)
> El 24 oct 2017, a las 13:48, Jaroslav Tulach
> escribió:
>
> Btw. The diff module & co. contain code to apply a patch. The code is used
> in the IDE.
> -jt
>
>
> 2017-10-24 13:10
OK, I have created an 'android' branch:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/branches
Are you sure we're able to simply take the content of that tar.gz and put
it into the android branch?
I.e., these files are (or can be) licensed to Apache?
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:27 PM, arsi w
Hi,
OKwe can move it there..
but I do not know how to do it..
The sources are here: http://server.arsi.sk/Gradle-Android-support.tar.gz
Arsi
*From:* Geertjan Wielenga
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 2:50PM
*To:*
geertjanw commented on issue #130: Cache external binaries downloaded from
maven in NetBeans' cache.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/130#issuecomment-338986015
@jlahoda, looks good to me.
This is an au
Hey,
I’m searching for the developer of some Firefox plugins and some NetBeans
Plugins. He is called Wind Li, his mail was w...@netbeans.org or
win...@netbeans.org but they don’t work anymore.
I’m searching it because of the source Code of the Project Groups plugins for
NetBeans: http://plugin
Hi all,
Note that we have a community blog in which everyone can blog about their
usage/development of Apache NetBeans:
https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/
Everyone is welcome to blog there (tips and tricks about NetBeans; some
interesting problems re doing the module review; whatever you want to
Great. Note that if you want to collaborate with others, regardless of how
stable it is right now, etc, the Apache Way of doing things is to
collaborate at Apache, i.e., not in a separate GitHub repo somewhere
outside Apache, but in Apache itself. I.e., the way would be to create a
branch off of th
geertjanw commented on issue #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/182#issuecomment-338977529
Makes sense, thanks, merging.
This is an automated message from the Apache
geertjanw closed pull request #182: Using HTML/Java 1.5 release bits
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/182
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign
geertjanw closed pull request #178: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review schema2beans
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/178
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a
geertjanw commented on issue #178: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review schema2beans
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/178#issuecomment-338976933
Will create low-prio ticket and have excluded these files via Rat
exclusions, so closing this PR.
-
geertjanw closed pull request #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data
to Rat exceptions
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/187
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of prov
geertjanw commented on issue #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans test data
to Rat exceptions
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/187#issuecomment-338976315
OK, these updates are modifications to the existing Rat exclusions, and a
simplification of part of it, only t
Hi,
I think it should be a separate repository.
I started under NB81, where Radim ended. As I wrote it should first be
stabilized under NB 81/82 as plugin.
And after all my life I work with hg, git kills me ;)
Arsi
Here's a 3 minute overview of what's needed to be done:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4PBNSRp5g8
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Christian Lenz
> wrote:
>
>> Ok so I got a mail from asfgit
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> I'd like to provide some mentor guidance to this discussion.
>
Many thanks for these insights!
I think we all should read the below a few times, mainly from the
perspective of how to think about what we're doing at Apache and the way to
approa
I think first we should treat it like a plugin as it is atm, as you already
said. It can moved to github first and we can create tickets and PRs etc.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Christian Lenz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 14:17
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: AW
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Christian Lenz
wrote:
> Ok so I got a mail from asfgit: You are now a member of The Apache
> Software Foundation!
>
> But can’t see me in the list of the contributor of incubator-netbeans.
And you will never see yourself as a contributor until you contribute
so
Here is the source: https://twitter.com/jgauravgupta/status/743659073317396480
It is based on JFludion I think.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: arsi
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 14:03
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Android support analysis
Hi,
I contacted Radim Ku
The word "shall" should be "should" here -- i.e., the question to mentors
is do we need to upload somewhere the release to complete it? Or is it
complete right now?
Thanks,
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> 2017-10-23 15:00 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Tulach :
>
> > Hi.
> > T
Wow, thats cool 😊
There is a Long discussion with gaurap gupta, founder of the Jeddict plugin
former as JPA modeler:
https://twitter.com/jgauravgupta/status/743659073317396480. He already started
a Android modeler, maybe we can extends it?
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: arsi
Gesendet:
Excellent news!
Maybe you could consider making an android branch of Apache NetBeans, just
like these:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/branches
So that others can collaborate with you on your work?
I.e., this would be a new feature branch.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:02 PM, arsi
Hi,
I contacted Radim Kubacki author of the NBANDROID project.
According to his words, it has nomotivationto continue development.
(last commit is from 2015)
But he has nothing against that the community will continue to develop
the project and that it could part of Apache netbeans.
NBANDROID
arusinha opened a new pull request #190: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.commons.io
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/190
Added maven coordinate for external resource commons-io-1.4.jar
This is an au
2017-10-23 15:00 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Tulach :
> Hi.
> The source release is approved. The source ZIP and associated files are
> currently at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/
> shall we upload them somewhere else?
>
Dear mentors,
I'd like to really know answer to this q
Btw. The diff module & co. contain code to apply a patch. The code is used
in the IDE.
-jt
2017-10-24 13:10 GMT+02:00 Antonio Vieiro :
> Hi all,
>
> The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1])
>
> AFAIK all the build system requires little external tools. Are we
> r
Anything Java EE related is going to be part of EE4J, i.e., Eclipse
licensed, which is fine from Apache's perspective, i.e., so long as
something is not GPL(+something), Apache is OK with it.
Maybe I've simplified things too much, but it appears like this.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:42 PM, ehs
Hi,
Maybe this is not the right channel but in the WildFly plugin I use
schema2beans to produce configuration beans.
Current JBoss/WildFly schemas extend J2EE/ JavaEE ones which were licensed
by Sun/ Oracle under LGPL. Red Hatr would consider moving to ASL2 those
schemas but since they are extendin
arusinha commented on issue #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.boot
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/188#issuecomment-338958063
Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same
T
arusinha closed pull request #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/188
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
arusinha commented on issue #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot.fx
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/186#issuecomment-338957969
Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same
--
arusinha closed pull request #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot.fx
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/186
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As t
arusinha closed pull request #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.geo
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/184
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
arusinha commented on issue #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html.geo
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/184#issuecomment-338957833
Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same
T
arusinha commented on issue #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot.script
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/185#issuecomment-338957892
Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same
-
arusinha closed pull request #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot.script
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/185
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
arusinha commented on issue #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183#issuecomment-338957738
Closing the pull request as Jan Lahoda will work on the same
This i
arusinha closed pull request #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a
Ok so I got a mail from asfgit: You are now a member of The Apache Software
Foundation!
But can’t see me in the list of the contributor of incubator-netbeans. I will
create a Feature/test soon to test it, whether I have acces or not. Thx.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Christian Lenz
wrote:
> I wasn’t added to this list: https://github.com/apache/
> incubator-netbeans/graphs/contributors
That shows you who has committed to Apache NetBeans so far. Do a pull
request (i.e., do a Module Review) and when it is accepted and merged,
I wasn’t added to this list:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/graphs/contributors
As I understand it right, in an other mailinglist, we will use Feature branches
instead of using forks with pull requests. Thats why I asked to please add me
to the github repo.
Some minutes ago, I we
geertjanw commented on issue #168: adding insane dependency for tests in
keyring.fallback
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/168#issuecomment-338957182
Nice, thanks.
This is an automated message from the
geertjanw closed pull request #168: adding insane dependency for tests in
keyring.fallback
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/168
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
sarveshkesharwani commented on issue #168: adding insane dependency for tests
in keyring.fallback
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/168#issuecomment-338957056
This fixes the failing tests in "MasterPasswordEncryptionTest.java" and
"FallbackProviderTest.java" in the mo
Hi all,
The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1])
AFAIK all the build system requires little external tools. Are we
ready for requiring an external "patch" command or should we roll back
that change?
Thanks
Antonio
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbean
jlahoda commented on issue #183: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review net.java.html
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183#issuecomment-338953182
I am sorry, but Jarda sent a pull request this morning changing the Html4J
binaries for version 1.5, which is Apache licensed. I am a
geertjanw commented on issue #180: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
java.hints.declarative
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/180#issuecomment-338952650
Discussed on the mailing list in the thread "Review of
java.hints.declarative". Please someone review and approve and mer
vikasprabhakar opened a new pull request #189: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
web.browser.api
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/189
Added license header for webpreview.wsmode
This is an automated message fro
vieiro commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-338942929
You need a command-line "patch" program. I'm not sure how to install int in
Windows (I don't use Windows myself).
Th
arusinha opened a new pull request #188: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/188
Added license file for external resource net.java.html.boot-1.4.jar
This is an
geertjanw opened a new pull request #187: [NETBEANS-54] adding schema2beans
test data to Rat exceptions
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/187
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
arusinha opened a new pull request #186: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot.fx
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/186
Added license file for external resource net.java.html.boot.fx-1.4.jar
This
If you're a committer, you already have access to the repo.
Since we have GitBox integration, you can do pull requests from GitHub, if
you set it up: https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Christian Lenz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I’m in as a contributor, signed CLA, pl
arusinha opened a new pull request #185: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.boot.script
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/185
Added license file for external resource net.java.html.boot.script-1.4.jar
arusinha opened a new pull request #184: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
net.java.html.geo
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/184
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
bolsover commented on issue #172: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review
o.apache.xml.resolver
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/172#issuecomment-338919992
Having problems with this..
Build is failing with message:
-prepare-patched-binary:
[echo] Patching xm
arusinha opened a new pull request #183: Added license file for external
resource net.java.html-1.4.jar
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/183
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Hi,
as I’m in as a contributor, signed CLA, please add me as a contributor to the
incubator-apache repo.
Regards
Chris
97 matches
Mail list logo