Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, I added Justin to the CC of this email, as I never received Justins original email, either I'm not on the right list or it did not went to dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org. Am Montag, den 22.01.2018, 09:46 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > > ... > > -- Forwarded message -- > >

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

Hi Geertjan, Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2018, 17:53 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > > Looking at this: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117#issuecomment- > 339460139 > > It seems that those rat exclusions are now being called into > question: > >

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 at 17:39 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > These comments are relevant too: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/164081c59ee7dbc76cbf4884a9d80c241e19098f6b721851c2b8cb5d@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > Not sure why there's any

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 at 17:37 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > No, this is a big concern -- this category B thing. > I've commented on the issue - but only one file is not dual-licensed and therefore Cat B rather than Cat A. > > I don't understand why these files

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

These comments are relevant too: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/164081c59ee7dbc76cbf4884a9d80c241e19098f6b721851c2b8cb5d@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Gj On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > No, this is a big concern -- this

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 at 17:19 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Yes, I see that -- did someone respond to your points? > ish .. but I'm not on the general@incubator list - just looked through that thread and someone else made the same point ... > > And I'm curious

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

Yes, I see that -- did someone respond to your points? And I'm curious why these specific files were excluded via rat in the first place. Would be great if you'd add some thoughts to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-310. Gj On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Neil C Smith

Re: [matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 at 16:53 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117#issuecomment-339460139 > > It seems that those rat exclusions are now being called into question: > As I remarked on the vote thread, and as

[matthiasblaesing] EPL licenses and Rat exclusions

Hi Matthias, Looking at this: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117#issuecomment-339460139 It seems that those rat exclusions are now being called into question: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-310 See here during the IPMC vote:

Re: [Gentoo Package] C/C++ plugin sources

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:08:21 +0100 Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:14 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. > wrote: > > Are the sources for the C/C++ plugins published anywhere? I have > > been searching but not able to find them.

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans

Awesome news!!! > On Jan 23, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta rc2 passed the PPMC vote, though > during the IPMC vote a number of issues were identified. > > These issues are listed here: > >

Status of Apache NetBeans

Hi all, Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta rc2 passed the PPMC vote, though during the IPMC vote a number of issues were identified. These issues are listed here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta+rc3 The majority of the issues relate to remaining