Re: NetBeans Mentoring/Training Suggestion

> On Oct 6, 2017, at 4:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Ryan Cuprak <rcup...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... 1. Construct a list of individuals that have special knowledge for the >> differe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5

+1 > On Oct 8, 2017, at 9:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Graduation is a measure of the community, not any specific repository. The > entire Apache Netbeans community graduates together. > > The key things we look for: > > - Understand the Apache Way > - Understand

NetBeans Mentoring/Training Suggestion

Hello, I have been poking around the NetBeans code and had a request/idea.NetBeans is a good size codebase and there is a lot of history in the code. One of the challenges with such a large code base is that adding features or fixing defects can be daunting. Where is the code for feature X,

Re: [DISCUSS] Integration of 2nd donation

ilable, the below would build the >> Groovy cluster, as well as the base clusters (platform and java): >> >> ant -Dcluster.config=groovy >> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans#running-netbeans>Gj >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 20

Re: [DISCUSS] Integration of 2nd donation

Hello, You’ve taken 2nd donation and merged it with master and have it on a branch that now needs to be pulled into master? I built the code on your branch and ran it, however I don’t see any of the Java EE project types when I run ant tryme. Is this expected or is there more work to be

Re: Installers

Just out of curiosity, what about distributing NetBeans via the Apple App Store? That of course is an issue post-installer creation. Most apps I install I get from the App Store - prefer the app store for a variety of reasons. To do this, we would need an Apple Developer account owned by

Re: The Importance of Being Portable was: Think Java, not Electron!

My two cents, I think we should start a petition for JavaFX. It probably is a resourcing issue at Oracle with competing groups/managers. The function of user groups/community is to provide feedback to Oracle on things we think they should invest. We shouldn’t frame it as a JavaFX versus

Re: Oracle will remove JavaFX from Oracle JDK (was: Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK)

I published a blog entry on my take on the announcement: https://cuprak.info/2018/03/08/javafx-thoughts/ -Ryan > On Mar 9, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 22:31 Matthias Bläsing

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Logo (NETBEANS-145)

Logo ID 1 : +2 -Ryan > On Mar 1, 2018, at 7:32 AM, Antonio wrote: > > Hi all, > > For popular demand let's vote about the NetBeans Logo in the mailing list, > that's easier for everybody, right? This will close NETBEANS-145 [1]. > > The received entries are at [2]. > >

Unable to build?

Hi, I just updated to the most recent code and the build failed, has anyone else ran into this? -Ryan [nbmerge] Failed to build target: all-j2ee.eclipselink BUILD FAILED /Users/rcuprak/open-source/netbeans/nbbuild/build.xml:478: The following error occurred while executing this line:

NetBeans Nexus Repository?

We have a NetBeans Nexus? http://bits.netbeans.org/nexus/ I just discovered this after someone asked me if the NetBeans profiler API was available in Maven. It never occurred for me to check. Looks like Nexus is missing 9 artifacts. -Ryan

Re: Publishing Maven Artifacts under netbeans.org (was Re: Publishing Maven artifacts under third-party coordinates (was: Set up Nexus staging profile for Dubbo ...))

I just did a search and there is a task in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-467?jql=project%20%3D%20NETBEANS%20AND%20text%20~%20nexus I think the task needs to be split-up into sub-tasks with the first task being a proposal for how it would be implemented. -Ryan > On Nov

Re: Schliemann still alive?

Why Schliemann over ANTLR? I am just curious as ANTLR appears to have a lot of traction. -Ryan > On Dec 3, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Sven Reimers wrote: > > Hi all, > > If we gather enough interest and support in/from the community - I would > suggest looking into the Schliemann approach and