[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1520 by default skip javadoc/source jar ge...

Github user trkurc commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/234#issuecomment-185541846 applies clean to support/nifi-0.5.x and master. running through a test release:prepare and release:perform to verify correct behavior with those plugins --- If your proje

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1520 by default skip javadoc/source jar ge...

Github user trkurc commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/234#issuecomment-185538294 reviewing now --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature ena

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1520 by default skip javadoc/source jar ge...

GitHub user joewitt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/234 NIFI-1520 by default skip javadoc/source jar generation in nars/wars You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/joewitt/incubator-nifi NIFI-1

Git NiFi processor

I have an usecase where I have to pull some configuration files from Git repository and store them into a server directory, whenever files are updated via webhooks.[automated deployment] Checking if anybody build custom processor to pull files from Git. By the way, it would be nice if NiFi UI d

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-614 Added initial support for new style JM...

Github user trkurc commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/222#discussion_r53268977 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-jms-bundle/nifi-jms-cf-service/.gitignore --- @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +/lib/ --- End diff -- why is this necessary? ---

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 0.5.1 release

+1 On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Tony Kurc wrote: > All, > Just so we're clear, my expectations is that the fixes we need above will > go into master (0.6.0-SNAPSHOT). I (or the contributor) will attempt to > also apply those fixes to a branch I made off of nifi-0.5.0, called > "support/nifi-

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 0.5.1 release

All, Just so we're clear, my expectations is that the fixes we need above will go into master (0.6.0-SNAPSHOT). I (or the contributor) will attempt to also apply those fixes to a branch I made off of nifi-0.5.0, called "support/nifi-0.5.x", and when done we can test and when satisfied, start the 0.

[GitHub] nifi pull request: Fix NiFi-1501 : Test Monitor Activity has spuri...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/225 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

[GitHub] nifi pull request: Fix NiFi-1501 : Test Monitor Activity has spuri...

Github user trkurc commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/225#issuecomment-185514088 reviewing now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature en

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1491

Github user trkurc commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/227#issuecomment-185507765 reviewing now --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature ena

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1063

Github user trkurc commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/226#issuecomment-185507421 Merged in! Thanks for the contribution! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1063

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/226 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 0.5.1 release

I lieu of a decision on a git branching strategy, does anyone object to me naming a branch "support/0.5.x" so I can start pulling together 0.5.1? On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Team, > > First, congrats on getting 0.5.0 out the door. Very nice release with > excellent new fe

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 0.5.1 release

Sounds good to me (non-binding ;) Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > Team, > > First, congrats on getting 0.5.0 out the door. Very nice release with > excellent new features, enhancements, and bug fixes with involvement > of many new contributors. > > The

[DISCUSS] NiFi 0.5.1 release

Team, First, congrats on getting 0.5.0 out the door. Very nice release with excellent new features, enhancements, and bug fixes with involvement of many new contributors. The effort toward 0.6.0 is well underway and if we are shooting for our original target would still arrive around mid march-i

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NiFi 0.5.0 release

Hello, The Apache NiFi team would like to announce the release of Apache NiFi 0.5.0. Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. Apache NiFi was made for dataflow. It supports highly configurable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, a

Re: FlowFiles missing (MissingFlowFileException)

Mark, Joe, thanks a lot for investigating, reproducing and explaining what's going on, I couldn't have done that. I built the 0.5.0 RC3 version from the git commit mentioned and haven't changed a single configuration property. I hadn't even heard of archiving so far. Just looked at the properties

[GitHub] nifi pull request: nifi-1514 - Fixed: ExecuteStreamCommand does no...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/223 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

[GitHub] nifi pull request: nifi-1514 - Fixed: ExecuteStreamCommand does no...

Github user apiri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/223#issuecomment-185443013 @michalklempa looks good. one minor point that I am adjusting is the usage of newProperty at https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/223/files#diff-fe8e954d730443b47cb0a94d340

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1252

Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/229#issuecomment-185406656 @apiri That's OK for me! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1252

Github user pvillard31 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/229 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

Re: Set default yield duration

Bryan, Joe, Matt, Thanks very much for your comments and creating a JIRA! It will definitely be useful for my use case. Cheers, Adam On 2/17/16 11:46 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: I created this JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1526 -Bryan On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Matthew

Re: FlowFiles missing (MissingFlowFileException)

Lars, Joe is correct - i felt a need for coffee before trying to identify the exact case that will cause this issue to occur :) I created a ticket for this issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1527 I share your opinion that t

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#discussion_r53211145 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-amqp-bundle/nifi-amqp-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/amqp/processors/AbstractAMQPProcessor.java --- @@ -84,6 +89,72

Re: FlowFiles missing (MissingFlowFileException)

Lars, First of all thank you very much for reporting this and providing the detail you did. Mark Payne just replicated the problem it sounds like then rather than emailing he decided to go get coffee :-). We will be working this up for very prompt resolution and it warrants a release in my view.

Re: Set default yield duration

I created this JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1526 -Bryan On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Matthew Clarke wrote: > Every Processor's configuration should have 4 tabs (settings, scheduling, > properties, and comments). You can adjust the yield duration from the > settings tab a

Re: Set default yield duration

Every Processor's configuration should have 4 tabs (settings, scheduling, properties, and comments). You can adjust the yield duration from the settings tab and the run schedule from the scheduling tab. Matt On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Adam Lamar wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I've been workin

Re: FlowFiles missing (MissingFlowFileException)

It seems as if the Funnel thing wasn't actually the problem. Here's my new timeline: 18:14... - Stop Processors 18:15:40 - Shutdown NiFi (graceful and successful) 18:28:03 - Starting NiFi which seemingly deletes content 18:31++ - Add Funnel etc. and start Processors again (so only now do I see th

Re: Set default yield duration

I think it is a good idea to allow a processor to establish what are reasonable defaults for itself then let users tune it as they can today. Definitely a good JIRA to fire up. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > Adam, > > I think the idea was for the user to always control the

Re: Set default yield duration

Adam, I think the idea was for the user to always control these values through the user interface, and therefore there isn't a way that I know of for a specific processor to control the default values for yield duration and run schedule. I have always wanted to be able to do this though, specific

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185326467 Yes, you're right... I didn't know about this feature. I will change the processor to use the SSL Context as suggested. @olegz Regarding unit testing, I am not

Re: nifi question

Hello, Could you share a screenshot. Also, which web browser (and version) are you using ? Finally, which version of NiFi? Thanks JOe On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:24 AM, yonatan kebede wrote: > hi, > i am new to nifi and have got problems on the UI, that its not displaying > the icons on top of

nifi question

hi, i am new to nifi and have got problems on the UI, that its not displaying the icons on top of the processors and also in the connections/relations, it was working in windows 8 but when i update it to win 10 , sth like this happen? what do you think is the problem? or any helpis appreciated Re

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user joewitt commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185323176 +1 to Bryan's point. We should definitely try to leverage the SSL Context. Oleg is this something you can work with Pierre on with the unit testing? --- If your project

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user bbende commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185322119 Have we considered using the SSLContextService here rather than specifying all of the keystore/truststore properties in the processor? Usually the processor will ha

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1252

Github user apiri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/229#issuecomment-185321319 @pvillard31 Thank you for contributing this fix against the last release. This was handled via NIFI-1415 in commit 93e2c5219599f24b54517dd43195c3d121030c5e as part of the 0

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1420 Adding Splunk bundle

GitHub user bbende opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/233 NIFI-1420 Adding Splunk bundle ## Overview This pull request adds a Splunk bundle with the following processors: * **ListenSplunkForwarder** - Receives data from a Splunk forwarder, based

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#discussion_r53195449 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-amqp-bundle/nifi-amqp-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/amqp/processors/AbstractAMQPProcessor.java --- @@ -84,6 +89,7

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#discussion_r53186223 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-amqp-bundle/nifi-amqp-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/amqp/processors/AbstractAMQPProcessor.java --- @@ -84,6 +89,72

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user olegz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185272014 Ok, let's collaborate. If you can simply describe what you needed to do on both client and server to have SSL, I can definitely mock it on the _TestConnection_ and _TestChan

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185270244 Well I must admit I locally tested the change with a RabbitMQ server, but that's all. I had a look at the existing unit tests for AMQP processors but I am not sure

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user olegz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185265232 Pierre, first of all, huge thanks for the contribution! Quite an important feature especially for enterprise users. Quick question though. One of the initiatives we are goin

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232 NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31/nif

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1519 upgraded to the latest version of Spa...

GitHub user olegz opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/231 NIFI-1519 upgraded to the latest version of Spark 1.6.0 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/olegz/nifi NIFI-1519 Alternatively you can

[GitHub] nifi pull request: Fix NiFi-1501 : Test Monitor Activity has spuri...

Github user joewitt commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/225#issuecomment-185230292 @PuspenduBanerjee i will add you now as a contributor to the apache nifi wiki so you can do so. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1464, NIFI-78, NIFI-1487 Refactored Proces...

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/210#discussion_r53169197 --- Diff: nifi-commons/nifi-properties/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/NiFiProperties.java --- @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ public static final String ADMINIS

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1464, NIFI-78, NIFI-1487 Refactored Proces...

Github user olegz commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/210#discussion_r53169078 --- Diff: nifi-commons/nifi-properties/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/NiFiProperties.java --- @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ public static final String ADMINISTR

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1464, NIFI-78, NIFI-1487 Refactored Proces...

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/210#discussion_r53167209 --- Diff: nifi-commons/nifi-properties/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/NiFiProperties.java --- @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ public static final String ADMINIS

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1464, NIFI-78, NIFI-1487 Refactored Proces...

Github user olegz commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/210#discussion_r53166575 --- Diff: nifi-commons/nifi-properties/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/NiFiProperties.java --- @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ public static final String ADMINISTR

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1464, NIFI-78, NIFI-1487 Refactored Proces...

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/210#discussion_r53165063 --- Diff: nifi-commons/nifi-properties/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/NiFiProperties.java --- @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ public static final String ADMINIS

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1464, NIFI-78, NIFI-1487 Refactored Proces...

Github user olegz commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/210#discussion_r53164352 --- Diff: nifi-commons/nifi-properties/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/NiFiProperties.java --- @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ public static final String ADMINISTR

[GitHub] nifi pull request: Enhancement for NIFI-1045 : Add "backup suffix"...

Github user trixpan commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/230#issuecomment-185094912 Wouldn't it be a better choice to change the name of the new file instead of the existent one? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have