[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1689 ListFile test inconsistent on various...

Github user apiri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/326#issuecomment-205645456 Tested on a variety of platforms: - OS X 10.11 - JDK 8u77 - Maven 3.3.9 - Windows 7 - JDK 7u79 - Maven 3.3.9 - Windows 10 (VM) - JDK 8u51 - Maven 3.3.3 -

Re: [GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1689 ListFile test inconsistent on various...

As was I, but I can't test tonight On Apr 4, 2016 9:54 PM, "alopresto" wrote: > Github user alopresto commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/326#issuecomment-205592813 > > I was one of the people having issues with `TestListFile` on

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1689 ListFile test inconsistent on various...

Github user alopresto commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/326#issuecomment-205592813 I was one of the people having issues with `TestListFile` on the 0.6.0 build, but I rebooted my machine during an OS patch between then and now. As of right now, I can

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1689 ListFile test inconsistent on various...

GitHub user apiri opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/326 NIFI-1689 ListFile test inconsistent on various environments NIFI-1689 Correcting TimeUnit conversion to be milliseconds instead of the incorrect microseconds and using historical modified times to

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1728

Github user apiri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/325#issuecomment-205566498 Okay, I have a clean build across Windows for the issues at hand with Kafka tests and things work on a Windows 7 environment across a full build. --- If your project is

Re: NiFi 0.4.1 Very slow processing of flow files using PutKafka

Hi, Thanks for the replies. Your recommendation is to use 0.4.1 Kafka nar, correct? Do we need to upgrade NiFi from 0.4.0 to 0.4.1? Or just a nar upgrade should be sufficient? Does this also mean that 0.4.0 isn't a stable version to use as Kafka producer on high data rate? Thanks, Oscar

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1728

Github user apiri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/325#issuecomment-205557307 Hold off on anything at this time. Running through the tests I have found additional issues in the Windows environment. I suspect these are largely the same things and

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Adam Lamar wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> You're correct, a github PR only targets a single branch and Travis-CI >> only checks how the PR does at its own commit hash (that is, it >> doesn't

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Tony Kurc wrote: > Sean, how about yetus? Is this something yetus can do with the patch > testing in an automated way? Right now Yetus only checks a single target branch. For commits that can apply/merge cleanly we could add something to check

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1728

Github user joewitt commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/325#issuecomment-205522127 @apiri probably best to just be explicit on all the tests about the charset. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > You're correct, a github PR only targets a single branch and Travis-CI > only checks how the PR does at its own commit hash (that is, it > doesn't even check what the target branch would look like post-merge). > Hey Sean,

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-205493328 @olegz Following comments on JIRA, I reverted modifications on SSL Context service and added a Client Auth property (as it has been done in Cassandra processors). I

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1668 modified TestProcessorLifecycle to en...

GitHub user olegz opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/324 NIFI-1668 modified TestProcessorLifecycle to ensure FlowController is… … always shut down You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: [DISCUSS] create apache nifi 0.6.1

Ok proceeding with the release steps in just a bit. Will take a quick look at NIFI-1689 as this appears to cause some release verification hurdles for people on certain platforms. https://github.com/apache/nifi/tree/support/nifi-0.6.x Thanks Joe On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Jennifer

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1678

Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/323#issuecomment-205461796 This is a resubmission of #317 which was closed when we removed a temporary 1.x branch which it was referencing. Please see that PR for additional commentary. --- If

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

Sean, how about yetus? Is this something yetus can do with the patch testing in an automated way? On Apr 4, 2016 1:14 PM, "Sean Busbey" wrote: > You're correct, a github PR only targets a single branch and Travis-CI > only checks how the PR does at its own commit hash (that

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

You're correct, a github PR only targets a single branch and Travis-CI only checks how the PR does at its own commit hash (that is, it doesn't even check what the target branch would look like post-merge). On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Matt Gilman wrote: > To my

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

To my knowledge, when you open a PR in GitHub it only allows the contributor to select a single branch. The reviewer would need to check the compatibility if that contribution needs to be applied to both. Depending on the contribution, a separate PR may be required as the codebases diverge. In

Re: [DISCUSS] git branching model

Is travis ci / githib able to give immediate feedback if a PR doesn't merge into both? On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Matt Gilman wrote: > All, > > I have completed the branching discussed last week. > > - master contains the current 1.x baseline - Future 1.x releases

Re: Zookeeper issues mentioned in a talk about storm / heron

Mark, Fair points! Something an Apache Accumulo committer pointed out at meetup is the is that the scale issues may come sooner than a couple hundred nodes due to the size of writes and potential frequency of writes (Joe Percivall's demonstration on the windowing seemed like it could write much

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-483: Use ZooKeeper Leader Election to Auto...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/301 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Variable FlowFile Attributes Defined by FlowFile Content

Essentially all of the information contained in a FlowFile's contents would be translated to attributes. I would like to pass in a generic delimited file with two rows: - the first row contains header names, - the second row contains values for each header corresponding to a single entry. The

Trouble Starting Custom Salesforce Streaming API Controller Service

I have created a custom Controller Service for connecting to the Salesforce Streaming API to receive realtime Salesforce.com activity. Doing so requires using the CometD Bayeux Protocol and Jetty. I seem to be running into some class incompatibility issues when I attempt to enable the service. I

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1636: Print Stacktrace When Unexpected OnT...

Github user olegz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/285#issuecomment-205353808 They were logged at DEBUG only level and that was the issue since you would not be able to see them, but now if there is an error the stack trace will be printed --- If

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1660 - Enhance the expression language wit...

Github user ckmcd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/303#issuecomment-205345851 Please ignore the request to kick the Travis build. I rebased and that did it. :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1695: Remove hidden control characters

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/311 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1701 fixed StreamScanner, added more tests

Github user olegz closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/314 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor

Github user olegz commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#discussion_r58389967 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-amqp-bundle/nifi-amqp-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/amqp/processors/AbstractAMQPProcessor.java --- @@ -191,6 +201,14

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1698 Improving customValidate in AbstractH...

Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/313#issuecomment-205314233 +1 Looks good. Pushed changes to master and the support/nifi-0.6.x branches. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1686 - NiFi is unable to populate over 1/4...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/305 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1698 Improving customValidate in AbstractH...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/313 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1697 Ensuring FlowController appropriately...

Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/312#issuecomment-205303764 +1 Looks good. Merged to master and the support/0.6.x branch. Thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

Trouble Starting Custom Salesforce Streaming API Controller Service

I have created a custom Controller Service for connecting to the Salesforce Streaming API to receive realtime Salesforce.com activity. Doing so requires using the CometD Bayeux Protocol and Jetty. I seem to be running into some class incompatibility issues when I attempt to enable the service. I

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1697 Ensuring FlowController appropriately...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/312 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] nifi pull request: NIFI-1697 Ensuring FlowController appropriately...

Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/312#issuecomment-205294713 Revieiwng --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

Re: NiFi 0.4.1 Very slow processing of flow files using PutKafka

I wouldn't advise upgrading to 0.6.0 to address PutKafka issues, as there is an outstanding bug (NIFI-1701) that truncates messages. NiFi 0.5.1 with the 0.4.1 Kafka nar is at least functional. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Oleg Zhurakousky < ozhurakou...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Oscar > >

Re: NiFi 0.4.1 Very slow processing of flow files using PutKafka

Oscar Would you mind upgrading to NiFi 0.6.0? There were significant improvements to Kafka module Thanks Oleg On Apr 4, 2016, at 04:21, Oscar dela Pena > wrote: Hi NiFi team, This is our current NiFi flow: Our Kafka is version 0.8.2 and NiFi