+1 (binding) built on Windows 10 with Java 7 without issue. Verification
was successful
On Apr 14, 2016 5:17 PM, "Matt Gilman" wrote:
+1 (binding)
Build, hashes, signatures, etc all check out. Ran application
standalone/cluster in secure/unsecured mode and everything
Thanks Chris
Indeed let us know if/when/how to reproduce it so we can evaluate and see if it
is something we can validate/handle in NiFi before it is passed to Kafka (e.g.,
validation etc)
Cheers
Oleg
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 8:25 PM, McDermott, Chris Kevin (MSDU -
> STaTS/StorefrontRemote)
I looked at the Kafka client code and it seemed to me to be a bug in the
caller. There is a map passed that maps topics to number of consumers. In this
case it asserting that the number of consumers is greater than zero. If I can
repro the problem I'll try to isolate it in the debugger and
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59806518
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/util/ConfigTransformer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,571 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
GitHub user JPercivall opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/9
MINIFI-12 initial commit of http config change notifier
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/JPercivall/nifi-minifi MINIFI-12
+1 (binding)
Build, hashes, signatures, etc all check out. Ran application
standalone/cluster in secure/unsecured mode and everything functioned as
expected.
Matt
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Joe Skora wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * signature and hashes verify
> * built
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/354
NIFI-361 - Create Processors to mutate JSON data
This is an initial implementation of the TransformJSON processor using the
Jolt library. TransformJSON supports Jolt specifications for the
As with any system to system interaction things can happen. All
systems, including Kafka provide facilities to allow systems writing
to or consuming from it, to recover from failure cases. So let's just
focus on what the config/environment is and do our best to provide
ways to work past these
Chris
That is correct and for a change I am pretty happy to see this stack trace as
it clearly shows the problem and validates the approach we have.
So here are more details. . .
The root failure is in Kafka (as you can see from the stack trace). All we are
doing is encapsulating interaction
I’m running based of of 0.7.0 Snapshot. The GetKafka config is pretty generic.
Batch size 1, 1 concurrent task.
2016-04-14 19:27:23,204 ERROR [Timer-Driven Process Thread-9]
o.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.GetKafka
java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
I’m seeing this a lot in my logs. Does anyone have any idea what it is about?
The cluster view in the UI shows all nodes connected.
2016-04-14 19:45:29,310 INFO [Framework Task Thread
Thread-2-SendThread(localhost:2181)] org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn Opening
socket connection to server
Unfortunately I’ll answer the question with the question ;)
Is the additional processor related to the previous one? For example we have a
single bundle with more then one processor (e.g., Get/PutSomething). If so then
you can create another Processor in the same bundle (NAR).
If it is not then
Github user scottyaslan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/331#discussion_r59753289
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/pom.xml
---
@@ -628,8 +634,13 @@
Welcome Idioma...
1) You'll want to subsume your new processors under deeper Java packages
(you probably knew that).
2) In addition to the Java code, you'll add:
-src
-main
- resources
- META-INF
- services
- org.apache.nifi.processor.Processor
containing a list
+1 from me, too.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Pierre Villard <
pierre.villard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Pierre
>
> 2016-04-14 14:24 GMT+02:00 Joe Percivall :
>
> > +1
> > - - - - - - Joseph Percivalllinkedin.com/in/Percivalle:
> >
Hi,
currently, I have one custom processor + test in a similar folder structure
in my IDE (IntelliJ):
-CustomProcessors
-nifi-myprocessor-nar
-nifi-myprocessor
-src
-main
-java
MyProcessor.java
-test
-MyProcessorTest.java
I am
+1
Pierre
2016-04-14 14:24 GMT+02:00 Joe Percivall :
> +1
> - - - - - - Joseph Percivalllinkedin.com/in/Percivalle:
> joeperciv...@yahoo.com
>
>
> On Thursday, April 14, 2016 7:55 AM, Joe Skora
> wrote:
>
>
> +1 for SHA256
>
> Whatever
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/352
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hello
If you go to this link https://nifi.apache.org/mailing_lists.html you can
then click on the 'subscribe' link for the mailing lists you'd like to join
and then send the email. That registers you. You are able to register and
unregister yourself.
Hope that helps
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, Apr
Regards,
___
[Email_CBE.gif]Balaji KNV_Hari
Technical Architect
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom
Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/352#issuecomment-209967571
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/353
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Hello
You received a near immediate response which you can find here [1]. But
since you are not subscribed to the mailing list you did not receive the
response. Please subscribe here [2].
[1]
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello
>
> You received a near immediate response which you can find here [1]. But
> since you are not subscribed to the mailing list you did not receive the
> response. Please subscribe here [2].
>
> [1]
>
Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/331#issuecomment-209961026
Ensure breadcrumb placement is correct when bottom banner is visible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Hi Dev Team,
Good Morning!!
I hope you are trying hard by taking time from your busy schedule to provide
the inputs for the below questions.
It would be really helpful, if you can answer these at earliest as based on
this we want to try with other options to achieve the functionalities as per
Oleg,
Agreed. As I started only a few months ago, I have been using
AtomicReference and it has been reliable and satisfied all my needs.
(Just sayin'.)
Best
On 04/14/2016 05:22 AM, Oleg Zhurakousky wrote:
A bit unrelated, but how do you guys feel if we deprecate ObjectHolder so it
could
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/353
NIFI-361 - Create Processors to mutate JSON data
This is an initial implementation of the TransformJSON processor using the
Jolt library. TransformJSON supports Jolt specifications for the
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/331#discussion_r59717798
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/pom.xml
---
@@ -628,8 +634,13 @@
GitHub user olegz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/351
NIFI-1771 deprecated ObjectHolder
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/olegz/nifi NIFI-1771
Alternatively you can review and apply
+1 (non-binding)
Went through helper to verify build. Also verified the zip using the SHA-512
that Joe linked in the second helper email. Ran a contrib check build on
Windows 8 and OSX. Tested a couple templates as well.
- - - - - -
Joseph Percivall
linkedin.com/in/Percivall
e:
Idioma
Keep an eye on this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1771 and
consider using java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference
Cheers
Oleg
On Apr 14, 2016, at 7:01 AM, idioma
> wrote:
Bryan,
thank you so much, this is
GitHub user olegz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/350
NIFI-1764 fixed NPE in PutKafka
NIFI-1764 removed obsolete comment for MESSAGE_DELIMITER
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/olegz/nifi
+1
- - - - - - Joseph Percivalllinkedin.com/in/Percivalle: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 7:55 AM, Joe Skora wrote:
+1 for SHA256
Whatever process produces the checksums it would be nice if the checksum
files could be made compatible with the
+1 for SHA256
Whatever process produces the checksums it would be nice if the checksum
files could be made compatible with the "--check" option on the md5sum,
sha1sum, and sha256sum commands to simplify validation.
That format is "". With the checksum in
that format, running "md5sum --check
A bit unrelated, but how do you guys feel if we deprecate ObjectHolder so it
could be gone by 1.0?
AtomicReference is available from Java 5
Cheers
Oleg
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Bryan Bende wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It may be easier to move the load() out of the
Hi Bryan
Thanks for your input, I did get it to work now. Sorry for the delayed
response
Just to confirm if it reads from a certain file and compresses and writes
the compressed file to the Target Directory - how does nifi know that its
has read from a certain file already?
Or does it continue
Matt,
thanks for your reply, but I am not sure I have actually understood what you
mean. In my load method I have the following:
try{
transaction.commit();
}catch (TitanException ex) {
System.out.println("This is a failure message");
transaction.rollback();
}
How are you
38 matches
Mail list logo