Certainly can appreciate that sentiment, Tony. I have a pretty good flow
doing reviews that kind of abstracts away the fact that it is a PR versus
just another branch/remote. However, when it comes to code reviews, the
vast majority of my effort happens in GitHub at the moment. I believe
there
Worth considering, this twitter post has been circulating the blogosphere:
https://twitter.com/agentdero/status/889582259522736128
I'd like to ensure we don't forget other means of providing patches
(attaching a patch to a ticket). While github is convenient to some, using
it as the sole source
I'm a strong +0. I don't think think it is a huge step forward, but it
isn't a step back either.
On Jul 28, 2017 5:42 PM, "Andy LoPresto" wrote:
> +1 to enable gitbox.
>
> Andy LoPresto
> alopre...@apache.org
> *alopresto.apa...@gmail.com *
>
+1 to enable gitbox.
Andy LoPresto
alopre...@apache.org
alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> +1, I meant to bring this up after I saw the conversation on the
+1 to move to gitbox
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Excellent. Thanks for the input, Suneel. The before and after links are
> especially helpful.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
> > We migrated
Excellent. Thanks for the input, Suneel. The before and after links are
especially helpful.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and even had a
> release immediately.
>
> Yes, the PR commit workflow
Also from OpenNLP -- yes, the workflow is much simpler and faster. I highly
recommend it.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and even had a
> release immediately.
>
> Yes, the PR commit workflow is
Hey folks,
I saw mention on the Incubator general mailing list about Gitbox [1]. From
that message it seems like it would help considerably with some of the
maintenance tasks we perform on the repository. Has anyone in the
community used it on another project and have any opinions on it?
Doing
Hi,
For sending parquet files to s3, can I use the PutParquet processor
directly, giving it an s3 path or do I first write to HDFS and then use
PutS3Object?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-nifi-developer-list.39713.n7.nabble.com/Sending-Parquet-files-to-S3-tp16525.html
Sent from