Re: Creating no argument record path functions

2019-07-26 Thread Mike Thomsen
I was thinking about that, but is that generally safe? Are there are any known gotchas with mixing the two in the same field? On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:52 PM Bryan Bende wrote: > I know this doesn’t really answer the question, but in most cases couldn’t > you use EL ${now()} in the record path

Re: Creating no argument record path functions

2019-07-26 Thread Bryan Bende
I know this doesn’t really answer the question, but in most cases couldn’t you use EL ${now()} in the record path statement and it would get evaluated before the record path? On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:42 PM Mike Thomsen wrote: > I tried to creating a simple now() timestamp function and got

Creating no argument record path functions

2019-07-26 Thread Mike Thomsen
I tried to creating a simple now() timestamp function and got this: org.apache.nifi.record.path.exception.RecordPathException: org.antlr.runtime.tree.RewriteEmptyStreamException: rule optionalArgument at org.apache.nifi.record.path.RecordPath.compile(RecordPath.java:105) at

Re: svn commit: r35033 - /dev/nifi/nifi-fds/nifi-fds-0.2.0/ /release/nifi/nifi-fds/nifi-fds-0.2.0/

2019-07-26 Thread Zaminah Williams
Please send the instructions to be removed from this alias. Zaminah D Williams Onyx Consulting Services, LLC President/CEO (410) 814-7651 (o) (301) 467-6680 (c) From: scottyas...@apache.org Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 4:22:04 PM To: comm...@nifi.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Flow Design System 0.2.0

2019-07-26 Thread Scott Aslan
Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to announce that including my +1 (binding) vote the 0.2.0 release of Apache NiFi Flow Design System passes with 4 +1 (binding) votes 4 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 0 votes 0 -1 votes Thanks to all who helped make this release possible. Here is the

Re: UI Features

2019-07-26 Thread Rob Moran
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Raymond. Some of the items you call out have tickets already or there may be similar/related ones. I will plan to go through each and reply back with my findings. Thanks again! On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:46 AM ski n wrote: > I was creating a flow and I noticed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Flow Design System 0.2.0 (RC2)

2019-07-26 Thread Rob Moran
+1 Release this package as nifi-fds-0.2.0 Thanks for putting this together, Scott! On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:10 PM Joe Witt wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Full clean build following readme and testapp check out. L looks good. > Sigs/Commit checks out. > > I would recommend ditching the sha1 entry.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Flow Design System 0.2.0 (RC2)

2019-07-26 Thread Joe Witt
+1 (binding) Full clean build following readme and testapp check out. L looks good. Sigs/Commit checks out. I would recommend ditching the sha1 entry. 256 and 512 are good. Thanks On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:33 PM Marc Parisi wrote: > +1 (binding). I built and tested according to the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Flow Design System 0.2.0 (RC2)

2019-07-26 Thread Marc Parisi
+1 (binding). I built and tested according to the release helper guide. Demo app, hashes, readmes, and notices all look good. Thanks Scott! On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:09 AM Matt Gilman wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-fds-0.2.0 > > Ran through release helper. Checked out demo

UI Features

2019-07-26 Thread ski n
I was creating a flow and I noticed some things of the GUI that were missing. Don’t know if there already plans/tickets for these items, but I would like your opinion first. If you think it’s a good idea and there is no ticket yet than I will create one: 1) It’s already possible to align