Re: [nuttx] Apache and BSD license compatibility

I'm sorry about using the wrong address, that was my mistake. Justin, thanks for the quick response about the BSD-licensed code. That sounds workable. When I get close to implementation I'll send an email here (to the right list!) to give an update on how it would work. cheers adam On Thu,

Re: [nuttx] Apache and BSD license compatibility

I just noticed that this conversation was occurring on nu...@googlegroups.com.  Not sure how we got there.  Moving back to dev@nuttx.apache.org where I thought we were all along. There is one big difference. I have spoken (via email) with all of the authors and copyright holders and each has

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Thanks, I'll check it out! -adam On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:40 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > I'm talking about using drivers from the OpenBSD or FreeBSD projects, > > not the driver on Github. :) > > There is a partial port of the OpenBSD IEEE802.11 SoftMAC stack that I > did a long time ago

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

I'm talking about using drivers from the OpenBSD or FreeBSD projects, not the driver on Github. :) There is a partial port of the OpenBSD IEEE802.11 SoftMAC stack that I did a long time ago here too: https://github.com/gregory-nutt/nuttx_ieee80211

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

> The SocketCAN project on a branch is all BSD code and we have been given > the verbal blessing to take the code into the repository. But not clear > support or direction from anyone... only obstacles. > > If you can confirm that, then SocketCAN can come onto master immediately. > That would be

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

I'm talking about using drivers from the OpenBSD or FreeBSD projects, not the driver on Github. :) Okay This page on the Apache website is pretty clear that BSD licensed code may be included in an Apache project. The

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Thanks, I see the SPDX code now. It's GPL. So I'm not psyched about using that. :) I'd rather have something I can borrow from directly. -adam On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:18 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > 54 Mbps would work for me. But I didn't see a LICENSE file or any text > about it in the README

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

I'm talking about using drivers from the OpenBSD or FreeBSD projects, not the driver on Github. :) -adam On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:19 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > This page on the Apache website > is pretty clear > that BSD licensed code

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

This page on the Apache website is pretty clear that BSD licensed code may be included in an Apache project. But, unfortunately, that driver on github is GPL.

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

54 Mbps would work for me. But I didn't see a LICENSE file or any text about it in the README file either in that repo. So I'm assuming this is not a driver that can be used. Or else it needs some work with Microchip to get them to clarify the license. Re: using a BSD driver, I didn't get

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Cool, I'll take it up the Apache folks before I start that project. This page on the Apache website is pretty clear that BSD licensed code may be included in an Apache project. -adam On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:13 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: >

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Re: using a BSD driver, I didn't get what you mean about bringing in 3rd party code– it's BSD licensed, my understanding is that it can be brought in. Is that wrong? You will need to discuss with Justin.  We have talked about this numerous times and still don't have any idea what is

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Greg, 54 Mbps would work for me. But I didn't see a LICENSE file or any text about it in the README file either in that repo. So I'm assuming this is not a driver that can be used. Or else it needs some work with Microchip to get them to clarify the license. Re: using a BSD driver, I didn't get

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:26 PM Adam Feuer wrote: > This module does have a 50Mhz SDIO interface, so if it can use 4 bit mode, > it could work. However, the ATWIL3000 Linux driver on Github > does not appear to have an open > license– all the code is marked

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Hey Greg, That looks like a cool module. The issue for me is that I need high speed Wifi connectivity (20 Mbps+, ideally 50Mbps+) for my upcoming projects. SPI/UART modules like this one usually have much lower throughput. This module does have a 50Mhz SDIO interface, so if it can use 4 bit

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Hey, SAMA5D2 guys, I have been looking at the ATSAMA5D27-WLSOM1 Evaluation Kit.  I am impressed.  It is based on the SAMAD27C and the ATWIL3000 wireless module.  I am tempted to buy one. The ATWIL3000 has an SDIO interface to the Wifi (like the Broadcom chips) and UART interface to the

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Takeyoshi, Hey, in case you are interested, I got the SDMMC driver port working for reading data today. It's quite a mess, and on a private branch. I will try to get it working for writing, clean it up, and push it to this branch in a few days. Thanks so much for your help!! cheers adam On

RE: New Wiki Page

This is super helpful! Thank you Greg! -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 7:07 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: New Wiki Page Why Can't Kernel Threads Have pthreads?

Re: New Wiki Page

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:07 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > Why Can't Kernel Threads Have pthreads? > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=158862687 Thank you! Nathan

New Wiki Page

Why Can't Kernel Threads Have pthreads? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=158862687