Re: NAND Flash supported Board suggestion

Hi all, Thank you for the knowledgeable insights! Regards, Saurav Pal On Sun, 26 May, 2024, 18:03 Alan C. Assis, wrote: > It is at drivers/mtd/dhara.c > > Unfortunately NuttX is full of "hidden features", that is something that I > try to avoid during the code view: >

NAND Flash supported Board suggestion

Hi all, I'm working on creating a file system for NAND Flash for NuttX as part of GSoC '24. I would be thankful of any suggestions that you might have for the type of board that I should use and the NAND flash as well. Thank you in advance. Regards, Saurav Pal

Re: Welcoming Saurav Pal to NuttX GSoC

whenever and wherever possible. Thank you again for selecting me and my proposal. I am aiming to exceed your expectations! Regards, Saurav Pal On Fri, 3 May, 2024, 00:56 Alan C. Assis, wrote: > Hi NuttXers, > > As Lup commented, we have two NuttX proposals accepted to the GSoC 2024. >

Re: Rust in the OS?

*Rust was included in Linux would help On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 10:40 AM Saurav Pal wrote: > Hi, > > I think some of the reasons why Rust was included in Rust would help. > > *Pros*: > - Memory safe if used correctly. > - A central toolchain like cargo (some might

Re: Rust in the OS?

Hi, I think some of the reasons why Rust was included in Rust would help. *Pros*: - Memory safe if used correctly. - A central toolchain like cargo (some might consider it as a con, but it's easy to attract new blood if they don't have to learn an entire new toolchain for a project). - As Linus

Re: littlefs BIOC_FLUSH in NAND flash

of 4096 pages in a 2MB virtual device). PS: I had to use vi to view the logs in nsh in a sane manner, though a tool like less would be godsend in such cases. BR, SP On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 9:23 PM Saurav Pal wrote: > Hi Xiang and Alan, > > Thanks for the info Xiang. > > Alan,

Re: littlefs BIOC_FLUSH in NAND flash

ed: 28 > > #define ENOSPC 28 /* No space left on device */ > > BR, > > Alan > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 9:28 AM Saurav Pal wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been trying to develop a device simulator for the NAND flash (in the > > sim). > >

littlefs BIOC_FLUSH in NAND flash

Hi all, I've been trying to develop a device simulator for the NAND flash (in the sim). A short note on what this does is create a virtual NAND flash (from RAM) and provide a driver, as well as a wrapper around the upper half (which for now, does nothing extra). This helps in creating records of

Re: Device Discovery

MCU needs > multiple daemon. > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:07 PM Saurav Pal wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the clarification. > > > > Also, am I right in thinking it would increase performance if there was a > > single daemon working rather th

Re: Device Discovery

something like a "udev" for NuttX, but there are > > daemons/services used to detect when a SDCard is plugged, when a USB > > device is attached, etc. > > > > We could add something like a lite "udev" for NuttX. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Alan > >

Device Discovery

Hi all, I am not able to understand how NuttX performs device discovery. I am trying to look for something that is similar to "udev". Can someone please help me understand? Thanks in advance. Regards, SP

Re: syncfs() method of fs

Hi Greg, I've added a comment about `syncfs` in the issue you mentioned. Thanks for pointing out the issue list. I'm looking into adding VFS documentation now, and after that I'll look into this. Thanks and Regards, SP On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:03 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > However, I think

Re: syncfs() method of fs

14/2024 8:16 AM, Saurav Pal wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was going through the codebase of different file systems, and I haven't > > yet understood the syncfs() method of mountpt operations. > > > > There aren't any existing filesystems in the codebase that implemen

syncfs() method of fs

Hi all, I was going through the codebase of different file systems, and I haven't yet understood the syncfs() method of mountpt operations. There aren't any existing filesystems in the codebase that implement it, and I couldn't understand what exactly is required from this method (like what it

Re: Detecting FS

system is vfat. > > It seems like you should be able to omit the file system type when > mounting and let the system figure out the file system type, but that > does not appear to be supported. > > On 2/12/2024 2:30 PM, Saurav Pal wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > > > Thanks for

Re: Detecting FS

ke a look at "static const struct fsmap_t g_bdfsmap[]" in the file > nuttx/fs/mount/fs_mount.c > > You will figure-out how the "magic" happens. > > Best Regards, > > Alan > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:20 AM Saurav Pal wrote: > > > Hi all, > &g

Detecting FS

Hi all, I am trying to write some docs for VFS in NuttX, but there's one thing I've been stumbling on for some time. How are the file systems detected from the storage devices? For example, if I have a storage device which has been formatted using VFAT...after (say) power on, how does NuttX

Re: FAT macro

> Some comments explaining what the commit is supposed to do! > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Pal > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Alan > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 5:14 PM Saurav Pal wrote: > &g

Re: FAT macro

t; > #define DIRSEC_BYTENDX(f,i) (((i) & DIRSEC_NDXMASK(fs)) << 5) > > I'm curious to know what this mistake could cause to VFAT on NuttX? > > Why haven't we seen any side effects in products using NuttX with VFAT? > > Best Regards, > > Alan > > On

Re: FAT macro

t; "calls" DIRSEC_BYTENDX. > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 11:55, Saurav Pal wrote: > > > Hi Alan, > > > > Thank you for looking at our code base and planning to add Documentation, > > > that is really important! > > > > > > NuttX has a long hist

Re: FAT macro

Hi Alan, Thank you for looking at our code base and planning to add Documentation, > that is really important! > > NuttX has a long history but our Documentation is still lagging behind, so > your work will be very beneficial for our community. > I'll try my best to contribute some documentation

FAT macro

Hi, I was browsing through the source code of FAT implementation, trying to write some documentation, and I came across this macro . Since I'm new to the codebase, I wanted to know if this (especially DIRSEC_NDXMASK(fs)) is