Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-21 Thread David Sidrane
On 2019/12/20 21:09:18, Gregory Nutt wrote: > [This conversation belongs on the dev list] > > > Which way is the mirrors? > > > > I believe I read somewhere, it's apache --> github. But I could be wrong. > > I recall Duo saying that you can set this up either way. > > > PMC I would

RE: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread David Sidrane
+1 -Original Message- From: Brennan Ashton [mailto:bash...@brennanashton.com] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 8:47 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers) On Fri, Dec 20, 2019, 8:31 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Duo Zhang
For me I do not think a jenkins job will stop others to try other solutions, like buildbot or travis CI or other CI tools. We can both provide our solutions, at least a POC, and then start to argue which one is better. And maybe both ways are fine, or we can find a way to them all in one. For

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
Same answer.  We need to clearly define how the workflow should behave first.  Then we will have a set of requirements that we can use to make trade-offs against the design options. With no requirements in hand, it is just people supporting their favorite tools or implementations they are

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
Thanks for your offer.  We really need to agree to an end-to-end workflow before we invest very much into implementation.  The implementation should not drive the workflow; the workflow requirements should drive the implementation. Unfortunately, the topic is now so poisoned that people don't

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Brennan Ashton
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019, 8:31 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > And I could help setting up the jenkins jobs on the asf infrastructure > against github PRs to test them automatically. The website is > https://builds.apache.org/ . Plan to work with Haitao together next week > on > this. > Could we please

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Duo Zhang
And I could help setting up the jenkins jobs on the asf infrastructure against github PRs to test them automatically. The website is https://builds.apache.org/ . Plan to work with Haitao together next week on this. I saw the very long thread about workflow and seems David was on fire so due to my

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Duo Zhang
The sync is bidirection. See this page: https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ On https://id.apache.org/ , fill your github username and then there will be an invitation sent to you on github to let you join the apache organization on github. And once the MFA status on

Re: Transferring Repositoies (Was Re: Masayuki Ishikawa added to NuttX committers)

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
[This conversation belongs on the dev list] Which way is the mirrors? I believe I read somewhere, it's apache --> github. But I could be wrong. I recall Duo saying that you can set this up either way.