Re: End-of-year Clean-up

Hi Nathan On Thursday, January 2, 2020, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:27 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis > wrote: > >> HI Nathan, >> >> On 1/1/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:14 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis < acas...@gmail.com >> > >> > wrote: >> >> On 1/1/20,

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:27 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > HI Nathan, > > On 1/1/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:14 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis > > > wrote: > >> On 1/1/20, Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> > * Brennan has done the Confluence pages, investigated Jira, create

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

HI Nathan, On 1/1/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:14 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis > wrote: >> On 1/1/20, Gregory Nutt wrote: >> > * Brennan has done the Confluence pages, investigated Jira, create >> > the >> > initial workflow page >> > * Nathan have been staying

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:14 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > On 1/1/20, Gregory Nutt wrote: > > * Brennan has done the Confluence pages, investigated Jira, create the > > initial workflow page > > * Nathan have been staying busy with the workflow > > * Abdelatif has been working a

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

I want to help reviewing the patches and be guided by you to do it well. Thanks, Alan! Imagine if we all tried to dispose on one PR per day.  That would be eleven PRs per day, 77 PRs per week, week could keep up with things without stressing anyone. Of course, it will be even easier

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

Sorry, I misunderstand that you suggest this will be the new workflow. Okay.  No problem.  Although I did feel like I was being attacked from all sides for just trying to make to progress. All discussion of the new workflow is happening here:

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

Hi, > I don't appreciate a lot of advice and criticism from people who contribute > nothing to this process. > I would try to assume good intent from the people who responded here. You want people to contribute and grow the community, Thanks, Justin

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

Sorry, I misunderstand that you suggest this will be the new workflow. I agree that before the new process is ready, your process should continue as before since you have most experience and insight how the whole thing work together. But the committer is growing and most of us don't have that

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

That list just documents how I have handled the me-only workflow in the past.  It is not the workflow that is being defined by Nathan and Brennan. I don't appreciate a lot of advice and criticism from people who contribute nothing to this process.  If everyone thinks I can going continue

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 5:09 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > Would it make sense, then, to begin a transition period now? That is, > > start a gradual move from the current state where Greg is reviewing > > and merging all changes, toward the direction where other committers > > are

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:50 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > Actually, I think I recommended (through implication) that we should not > use the 'dev' branch, but rather a custom, per-PR branch. A single dev > branch does not work for the reasons I mention above. The worst is that > many people are

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

On 12/31/19, Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> The workflow will be improved in the future, but any interim workflow >> will be the same flawed workflow that was used in the Bitbucket >> repositories.. with some tweaks for working together better. >> > I think that the only objective is a short term one:

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

Hi Greg and Nathan, On 12/31/19, Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> Would it make sense, then, to begin a transition period now? That is, >> start a gradual move from the current state where Greg is reviewing >> and merging all changes, toward the direction where other committers >> are reviewing/merging

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

Would it make sense, then, to begin a transition period now? That is, start a gradual move from the current state where Greg is reviewing and merging all changes, toward the direction where other committers are reviewing/merging changes. Perhaps, for the next couple of weeks, Greg could

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 3:01 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > That was actually necessary. We don't want to build a huge backlog. > > I still have some fears about what is going to happen after the > holidays. My experience is that things pick up slowly after the New > Year.So we have another week

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

That was actually necessary. We don't want to build a huge backlog. I still have some fears about what is going to happen after the holidays.  My experience is that things pick up slowly after the New Year.    So we have another week or so until go back to their normal rates. Even then,

Re: End-of-year Clean-up

That was actually necessary. We don't want to build a huge backlog. On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 1:32 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > I propose that I merge all PRs under the "old workflow" so that we can > start the New Year with a clean slate. Let me know if anyone is opposed. > >

End-of-year Clean-up

I propose that I merge all PRs under the "old workflow" so that we can start the New Year with a clean slate.  Let me know if anyone is opposed.