Re: different approach to remote UI

2009-02-04 Thread David E Jones
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: ...and GWT is Apache licensed ! That does make is easier to include... but isn't really a reason to use it... ;) 2009/2/4 Bruno Busco Well... ...to have something similar to this in the OFBiz UI : http://opensourcestrategies.com/images/o

svinfo on demo server

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700, following Bruno's ideas, I propose a patch to show the release number in footer. Could it be used on demo server ? It's just a matter of running "ant svninfo" (svninfo target) during the daily setup. Any reviews, comments appreciated Thanks

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1700) To show Current Revision number of OFBiz on its home site that will facilate in testing and comparing things with a local copy of OFBiz

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-1700: --- Attachment: svninfo.patch patch with : (run "ant svninfo" to show your version) > To show Cu

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1700) To show Current Revision number of OFBiz on its home site that will facilate in testing and comparing things with a local copy of OFBiz

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670555#action_12670555 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1700: I think, it's always better to keep commen

Re: different approach to remote UI

2009-02-04 Thread Bruno Busco
...and GWT is Apache licensed ! 2009/2/4 Bruno Busco > Well... > ...to have something similar to this in the OFBiz UI : > http://opensourcestrategies.com/images/opentaps_gwt_demo.htm > > 2009/2/4 David E Jones > > >> What for? >> >> -David >> >> >> >> On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Bruno Busco wro

Re: different approach to remote UI

2009-02-04 Thread Bruno Busco
Well... ...to have something similar to this in the OFBiz UI : http://opensourcestrategies.com/images/opentaps_gwt_demo.htm 2009/2/4 David E Jones > > What for? > > -David > > > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: > > It seems opentaps is going to use GWT. >> Shouldn't we consider

Re: different approach to remote UI

2009-02-04 Thread David E Jones
What for? -David On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: It seems opentaps is going to use GWT. Shouldn't we consider using it? -Bruno 2009/2/2 Jeroen van der Wal Dear Harmeet, Your GWT approach sounds promising. Could you share more details with us on how you did it and perhaps

Re: [jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1700) To show Current Revision number of OFBiz on its home site that will facilate in testing and comparing things with a local copy of OFBiz

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Yes this seems wiser/simpler indeed. The "unknown" generation should not be only in "ant build"' I guess, at least "ant run-install" as well and surely more (I use mostly these 2) Jacques From: "Bruno Busco" Yes, this is a good point. I agree but I then suggest to have the svninfo.ftl not co

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-2112) Minipol in eCommerce

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2112. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: David E. Jones (was: Jacques Le Roux) Fixed in 740515 > Min

Re: different approach to remote UI

2009-02-04 Thread Bruno Busco
It seems opentaps is going to use GWT. Shouldn't we consider using it? -Bruno 2009/2/2 Jeroen van der Wal > Dear Harmeet, > > Your GWT approach sounds promising. Could you share more details with > us on how you did it and perhaps supply some code? > > Thanks, > -Jeroen > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 200

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread David E Jones
Do we want to move in a direction where every base application has dynamic links like these? IMO the answer is no. In the MyPortal application it would make sense to do this, but in the Example app because of what it is meant for we should just use a static menu widget and not have a dyna

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-2167) Create account on checkout

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2167. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fixed in r740815 > Create account on checkou

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-2167) Create account on checkout

2009-02-04 Thread Josh Murphy (JIRA)
Create account on checkout -- Key: OFBIZ-2167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2167 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk Environment:

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+ 1 (good idea!) Jacques From: "Adrian Crum" One of the things that would be worth looking into is using the tree widget for menus. It already has the code for converting DB values to links and of course it supports a nested structure. -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Bruno, Hans, thanks

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-2161) Extending the capability of configurable product in OFBiz with Freature tree generation technique

2009-02-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-2161: --- Attachment: Pizza tree 2 issues.jpg Hi Amit, Thanks for all your explanations and help, I a

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Adrian Crum
One of the things that would be worth looking into is using the tree widget for menus. It already has the code for converting DB values to links and of course it supports a nested structure. -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Bruno, Hans, thanks for the info and insight... well I see two diffe

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-2161) Extending the capability of configurable product in OFBiz with Freature tree generation technique

2009-02-04 Thread Amit Sharma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670348#action_12670348 ] Amit Sharma commented on OFBIZ-2161: Hello Jacques, Let me describe more on steps. St

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Bruno Busco
I agree, this will let the Example application to be a demonstration for both the menu widget based AppBar and the dynamic portal pages. -Bruno 2009/2/4 Jacopo Cappellato > Bruno, Hans, > > thanks for the info and insight... well I see two different interesting > items in this: > > a) enhancing

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Bruno, Hans, thanks for the info and insight... well I see two different interesting items in this: a) enhancing the Menu Widget to support dynamically retrieved menu items (as you propose) b) having the Example application document the most common best practices What I am suggesting is

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Hans Bakker
Hi Jacopo. I completely agree with you and perhaps you can help here? The thing we can do in ftl and not in a menu is the processing of a list of buttons. If there could be a iterate function in a menu (similar to a <#list in ftl) to list the buttons from a list, then sure we can use a menu again

Re: Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Bruno Busco
Hi Jacopo, I agree with you, the Example (and all application) should follow the common pattern to implement the AppBarMenu (with menu widget). The reason the example component has been reverted to use a .ftl AppBar was to have a dynamic AppBar. Actually the menu-items that are displayed in the Exa

Menus in the Example application

2009-02-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, due to recent work on the Portal now the Example application is rendering the top menu using an ftl template and not as a Menu widget definition (as it was previously, if I am not wrong). Is there a reason for the switch (sorry but I still don't know much about the Portal framework)