Re: OFBiz Web Application won't load

2018-06-11 Thread Swapnil Mane
Hi Dev team, Looking into this mail on user list, I think we should change the url '//localhost:8443/accounting' to 'https: //localhost:8443/accounting' at https://ofbiz.apache.org/developers.html - Best Regards, Swapnil M Mane www.hotwax.co On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:39 PM Rajesh Mallah

Re: License issue with iText 4.2.0

2018-06-11 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
There are 18 emails so far in this thread of which 13 are yours. - You mentioned stuff from wikipedia - then you mentioned stuff about licensing - then you switched to birt - then you talked about the author - then you go back to questioning how to render PDFs in BIRT - then you talk about your

Re: License issue with iText 4.2.0

2018-06-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
No, I'm suggesting to drop itext as a whole, not only itextpdf. Is it so difficult to read me :-o ? I 1st spoke about "itext/4.2.0" (not itextpdf at all). Then I suggested to remove "it". <> I believe (it's no clear from Birt side) itext is something we drag from the 1st contribution of

Re: [Discussion] Introduction of Bootstrap and Vue.js

2018-06-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Sorry to be late, but after reading https://alistapart.com/article/cult-of-the-complex I wonder if we should not compare Bootstrap to "CSS Grid Layout" Depending the less possible on frameworks seems a good idea to me, and the "CSS Grid Layout" seems simple enough to be viable

Re: License issue with iText 4.2.0

2018-06-11 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
I'm a bit lost. What are you _exactly_ proposing to do here? Are you suggesting my exclusion syntax above (BTW better remove the version), or are you suggesting something else? On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Le 08/06/2018 à 16:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> >> Are we

Re: License issue with iText 4.2.0

2018-06-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 08/06/2018 à 16:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Are we sure there are no legal issues doing so? It seems OK at https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.lowagie/itext/4.2.0 (MPL) But reading https://developers.itextpdf.com/question/versions-older-than-5 which applies also to 4.2.0 (see bottom

gradle-versions-plugin OOTB?

2018-06-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, I was wondering: some projects use the trunk or I guess more often a release branch as source. Should we not provide them a way to check the branch they use has the last libs versions using gradle-versions-plugin with a documented tasks, or should this stay (a bit buried) in one of our

Re: svn commit: r1833231 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk: framework/widget/dtd/ framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model/ framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/r

2018-06-11 Thread Rishi Solanki
Taher, Gil, Jacques, I've created the Jira ticket for the same: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10432 Will soon have someone to take care, thanks again for your help! Rishi Solanki Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847

Re: svn commit: r1833231 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk: framework/widget/dtd/ framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model/ framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/r

2018-06-11 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Yeah I apologize for making too much noise in this thread, perhaps it would have been better discussed in JIRA. The reason I open these subjects up from time to time is to generally try to unify code. Whenever I see an opportunity to unify the way stuff works around the framework I cannot resist

Re: svn commit: r1833231 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk: framework/widget/dtd/ framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model/ framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/r

2018-06-11 Thread Rishi Solanki
Thanks Taher, Gil, Jacques for you feedback. I'll get back and take your inputs into consideration and all seems acceptable to me. For Taher's point I remember we have use when and read only (display field) checks and ignored tag to make the field non editable and non parameterized. This is only