+1 to remove that code and if needed other "optional" features, proceed
with the cleanup/refactoring and then re-evaluate the introduction of them
on a case-by-case after the cleanup is done.
Not because I think that the code is ugly but only to simplify the
refactoring effort.
Jacopo
On Thu, May
Hi Pierre,
yes, I have created the "framework/webtools" component in Jira a few
seconds ago.
Jacopo
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Pierre Smits
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we have a WebTools component in JIRA, so that we can separate the
> issues regarding that application from the rest of the
Same for me: I have submitted it the same day it was published :-)
Jacopo
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:03 PM, gil portenseigne <
gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote:
> Forgot to say i had it done :)
>
> Thanks Sharan !
>
> Gil
>
> On 24/05/2016 14:41, Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Thanks Mridul.
>
> For th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15297747#comment-15297747
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6783:
--
I have tested your last patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15295416#comment-15295416
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-7079:
--
One use case could be that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15295412#comment-15295412
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-7079:
--
Sounds good to me
> Extend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15294801#comment-15294801
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-7079:
--
I agree with Pierre about the
:-)
Thank you Jacques.
Jacopo
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> With 3 positive committers I decided to go, done for R14.12 r1744733
>
> R13.07 will need more work...
>
>
>
> Le 20/05/2016 à 14:12, Jacopo C
It sounds like a good idea to me too. And I agree with Jacques that we
should strive to maintain the same version in all the active release
branches 13.07, 14.12, 15.12.
Jacopo
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Deepak Dixit <
deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> No Jacques there is not specif
I second this approach as a general rule, if applied carefully and wisely
(as it is in this specific case).
By removing incomplete code, the person working on the refactoring will
have a simplified system to work with in the refactoring; the removed code
will always be available in the history of t
+1
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> +1
>
> Although it has gone into the trunk as an improvement, I see this as a
> little hole in functionality that needs fixing, so I would also support
> backporting it to 14.12 so that it will be included in our next release.
>
> Thanks
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15264131#comment-15264131
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6783:
--
Hi Taher,
I am not sure about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15263954#comment-15263954
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6783:
--
Looks good.
> Refactor sta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15251659#comment-15251659
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6808:
--
[~swapnilmmane] thanks for the p
12:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Le 10/04/2016 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>
>> Hi Jacopo, inline...
>>
>> Le 21/03/2016 15:10, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> Jacques, thanks for raising this point that I
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache
OFBiz 12.04.06".
Apache OFBiz™ is an open source product for the automation of enterprise
processes that includes framework components and business applications.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
"Apache OFBiz 12.04.06" is a bug fi
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache
OFBiz 13.07.03".
Apache OFBiz™ is an open source product for the automation of enterprise
processes that includes framework components and business applications.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
"Apache OFBiz 13.07.03" is a bug fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6226:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 12.04.06)
> Webpos F4-F11 label misma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6576:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 13.07.03)
> Pricing error in Variant Products when setup w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-6226.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Webpos F4-F11 label misma
The vote is now closed and successful with the following result:
* 13 positive votes ("+1") of which 6 binding votes
* one "+0" vote
Thanks and congratulations.
Jacopo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
The vote is now closed and successful with the following result:
* 12 positive votes ("+1") of which 5 binding votes
* one "+0" vote
Thanks and congratulations.
Jacopo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
+1
Jacopo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
> release13.07 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 13.07.03", will
> supersede all the p
+1
Jacopo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
> release12.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.06" will
> supersede all the p
I agree with Jacques
Jacopo
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi Dev,
>
> I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file
> altogether. It seems useless in trunk now
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apach
This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
release13.07 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 13.07.03", will
supersede all the previous releases from the same branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
*
This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
release12.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.06" will
supersede all the previous releases from the same branch and it will be the
last release of the 12.06 series.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https:/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15210350#comment-15210350
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5985:
--
This is indeed an interes
but with notsoserial protection
> activated)
>
> Ah, sorry wrote ant-secure target below :)
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 21/03/2016 15:18, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> how did you get that log? (how did you start OFBiz)
>>
>> Thanks,
&g
which need to be
> deactivated (trying to minimise the changes) with of course the RMI test
> services which would fail else.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 18/03/2016 17:28, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> than
for that. So now the
>> Upcoming Branch is one which is not yet created or is 15.12.01 unreleased
>> version a duplicate?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 20/03/2016 12:29, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>> I ha
Hi Jacques,
I have added it because it is required as a "Fix for" version for patches
that are backported to the 15.12 release.
Jacopo
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who added the 15.12.01 unreleased version in Jira and why?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15201657#comment-15201657
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6940:
--
This is a useful feature for exa
Improved the documentation in rev. 1735441
Jacopo
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> +1, thanks Scott for the idea and explanation!
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 17/03/2016 10:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15201195#comment-15201195
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6940:
--
Hi Vishal,
you have upload
async calls but we do lose the feature that the caller is immediately
> notified that the job they've executed isn't valid.
>
> The other option is to improve the documentation for these events so devs
> aren't taken by surprise.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
&g
Hi Jacques,
thanks for working at this.
However I think that there is a simpler/better way to disable the component
by default; by using the following patch:
Index: framework/start/src/org/ofbiz/base/start/start.properties
===
--- fr
Le 09/03/2016 11:08, Julien NICOLAS a écrit :
>
>> +1
>>
>> There is a lot of tweet with @apacheOfibz and it could be interesting to
>> have it as main news.
>>
>> Le 09/03/2016 10:45, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> Proposal:
>>> in t
Proposal:
in the main page of the ofbiz web site, move the "Tweets" section from the
right bar to the main section of the page, before the "News" section; then
rename the "News" section into "Announcements" or similar.
Goal:
give more visibility to our tweets because it is a more dynamic section
w
Gregory is a software security expert that has been "silently" helping the
OFBiz project for years by testing and assessing the security aspects of
our system and submitting valuable and precise reports and helping the PMC
to resolve them.
On behalf of the PMC, welcome onboard Gregory.
at code in runAsync! BTW I'm not objecting to your proposal,
>>> merely commenting on the oddness of having that piece of code in there in
>>> the first place.
>>>
>>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Jacopo Cappella
ice
> eventually triggers all ECAs, why did anyone go through the effort of
> putting that code in runAsync! BTW I'm not objecting to your proposal,
> merely commenting on the oddness of having that piece of code in there in
> the first place.
>
> Taher Alkhateeb
>
> On
trying to find where the logic described above is happening, am I in
> the right place at ServiceDispatcher on the runAsync method right next to
> the checking of pre-auth ECA rules?
>
> Taher Alkhateeb
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappell
Hi all,
I am sharing here the result of an analysis that Nameet Jain and I did to
figure out why, under some circumstances the same seca service was executed
twice.
The problem is that, when a service is executed as "async" the secas
attached to the "auth" and "in-validate" events are executed tw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15156735#comment-15156735
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6808:
--
The behavior reported in this ti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15154200#comment-15154200
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6907:
--
Same here! :-)
Hi Hans,
this commit has broken the accounting report (trial balance etc...); see
for example:
https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org/accounting/control/IncomeStatement?organizationPartyId=Company
Could you please look into it?
Thank you
Jacopo
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:45 AM, wrote:
> Author:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-5522:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-hyderabad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-5522:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-pune/)
> Introd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-5522:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-bangalore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-5522:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-chennai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15142708#comment-15142708
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6568:
--
Improved the code at revis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-6568.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Update Groovy to 2.4.5 vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15142515#comment-15142515
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6568:
--
I am still working on a slig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6568:
-
Fix Version/s: 15.12.01
> Update Groovy to 2.4.5 vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6568:
-
Summary: Update Groovy to 2.4.5 version (was: Updates Groovy to 2.4.4
version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15141011#comment-15141011
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6568:
--
I have upgraded the trunk and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6568:
-
Affects Version/s: Release Branch 15.12
> Updates Groovy to 2.4.4 vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-6568:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato (was: Jacques Le Roux)
> Updates Groovy to 2.
I love the idea of dedicating the whole 14.12 series to Adrian.
Jacopo
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Sharan-F wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> Looking at our tentative release schedule we have said that this month we
> would look at releasing 14.12.01. It has been maturing for over a year so
> are we
;
>>>
>>> Key: OFBIZ-6760
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760
>>> Project: OFBiz
>>> Issue Type: Impr
A) -1
B) +0
C) +1 (if you mean src/main/groovy and src/main/groovyScripts
Jacopo
PS: I also like the "Obi-Wan Kenobi" proposal!
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Nicolas Malin
wrote:
> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open th
es Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> What makes you think "messages go to the standard output instead of the
> logging framework" ?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 20/01/2016 08:58, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> I think there is also a problem in the w
I think there is also a problem in the way Tomcat is setup to use log4j:
messages goes to the standard output instead of the logging framework; it
may be due to a missing jar when the last upgrade of Tomcat was implemented
in OFBiz.
Jacopo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Deepak Dixit <
deepak.di
Hi Jacques,
I don't know from where the "tru" and "trun" versions come from :-)
A few minutes ago I went into the admin pages of the project and I was able
to delete them, it should be fixed now.
As regards the released versions... we could actually just keep the latest
visible in Jira for every
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15101374#comment-15101374
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6802:
--
I like the idea of having a gl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6802:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: trun)
Trunk
> be able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6802:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: tru)
> be able to set accounting company in the header, rem
This is terrible news.
Adrian and I finally met in person for the first time the last year during
ApacheCon @ Austin, after mostly a decade of collaboration for the OFBiz
project, as committers and PMC members.
It is really sad to realize that we will never meet again.
Jacopo
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016
Jacques
>
> Le 29/12/2015 18:19, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> Should we create a 15.12 branch before the end of the year?
>> I don't have a strong opinion but it may be nice to create since:
>> 1) the 12.04 is approaching the end of life and we usually kee
Should we create a 15.12 branch before the end of the year?
I don't have a strong opinion but it may be nice to create since:
1) the 12.04 is approaching the end of life and we usually keep 3 live
branches
2) several changes have been introduced since the last (14.12) branch
3) it is nice to avoid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-6760.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in rev. 1720413
Community's feedback is welcome!
&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-6772.
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in rev. 1720312
> Add ability to specify compari
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-6773.
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in rev. 1720312
> Add ability to specify categories/produ
Jacopo Cappellato created OFBIZ-6773:
Summary: Add ability to specify categories/products to filter the
order sub-total amount eligible for a discount.
Key: OFBIZ-6773
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
Jacopo Cappellato created OFBIZ-6772:
Summary: Add ability to specify comparison operators for
promotions with conditions on quantity
Key: OFBIZ-6772
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6772
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-6760:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Move all entity definitions from the applicati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15058482#comment-15058482
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6766:
--
For your information:
h
There are indeed some data model inconsistencies in this area.
After reviewing the commit (817605) that introduced the field productWeight
I think that the following applies:
"weight" should be used to specify the "shipping weight" of the product
"productWeight" should be used to specify the actual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15052396#comment-15052396
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6763:
--
The (naive) mechanism curre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15052299#comment-15052299
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6763:
--
Thanks for your work [~mpowacht]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15050637#comment-15050637
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6760:
--
I have been running my l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15050293#comment-15050293
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6760:
--
Here is the branch where you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15048810#comment-15048810
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6760:
--
It is not a big change, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15048731#comment-15048731
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6760:
--
Hi [~jacques.le.roux], I ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-6730.
> Return shipment created for non-physical prod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-6729.
> Return invoice not generated for service (non-physical) prod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6729:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12)
(was: Trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-6728.
> Getting error when returning service (non-physical) prod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-6728:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12)
(was: Trunk
gt; --
>
> Taher Alkhateeb
>
> > On Nov 19, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was actually thinking to Birt as an example of this behavior: but in
> the
> > future we may add other special purpose appl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-6730:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Return shipment created for non-physical prod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-6728:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Getting error when returning service (non-physi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-6729:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Return invoice not generated for service (
d be more surgical...
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 19/11/2015 09:46, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> I agree with Taher when he says that we should strive to move small steps
>> in the direction of having a lean lightweight framework with pluggable
>> components.
>>
I agree with Taher when he says that we should strive to move small steps
in the direction of having a lean lightweight framework with pluggable
components.
But I think that Nicolas' proposal is actually one of these steps.
The fact that currently some of our specialized components are overriding
t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15011140#comment-15011140
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6728:
--
Yes, I agree, and the use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15008572#comment-15008572
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6728:
--
Just to provide some context a
Hi Nicolas,
I like your proposal.
Jacopo
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Nicolas Malin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With some latest great discussion about keep or not keep specialpurpose
> components on branch, I some inconvenience come from that a specialpurpose
> can be overload the definition (ser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14966841#comment-14966841
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-2328:
--
Hi Jacques,
we can close this
701 - 800 of 6139 matches
Mail list logo
