twax.co/>*
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:07 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi Suraj,
This is due to OFBIZ-11621, OFBIZ-11627, OFBIZ-11637 and OFBIZ-11624
which are all conversion of CRUD simple services to entity-auto
Notably checkStatusCustRequest servi
issues.
TIA
Jacques
Le 05/05/2020 à 11:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I fixed 2 cases with (but not related to) OFBIZ-11620
Remains the 3 custrequesttests and testCreateTimeEntry failures in both
framework only and framework+plugins integration tests.
Not sure when they appeared as things
Hi,
I fixed 2 cases with (but not related to) OFBIZ-11620
Remains the 3 custrequesttests and testCreateTimeEntry failures in both
framework only and framework+plugins integration tests.
Not sure when they appeared as things got blurred.
Jacques
Le 04/05/2020 à 19:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf947_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler scheduler named 'onTrunkFrameworkCommit'
triggered this build
Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] 649614507bab6ff955e243a5858c1353150dfd42
Blamelist: Jacques Le Roux
BUILD FAILED
Le 04/05/2020 à 15:16, James Yong a écrit :
Hi all,
I saw some recent PR from https://github.com/apache/ofbiz
Suggest to add a notice to indicate the repository is old and for user to use
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework instead.
Regards,
James
+1
Jacques
Hi James,
I trust a Jira fits
Thanks
Jacques
Le 04/05/2020 à 14:54, James Yong a écrit :
Hi all,
Current Gradle version used in OFBiz trunk is 5.0.
Propose to update to Gradle 6.3 which is the current stable version.
Gradle 6.3 requires groovy 2.5.10., but Groovy version used in OFBiz
Hi,
As I wrote in OFBIZ-11269 at https://s.apache.org/pf2ty, please consider:
We should change in the "Committer Access" section of
source-repositories.tpl.php
When you first connect you will be prompted to accept the SSL certificate. Verify the certificate is for svn.apache.org. After
and it seems
there is no duplicate seca rule.
There are no duplicate seca warning on ./gradlew loadAll or on ./gradlew
ofbiz
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
ofbiz.apache.org
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi,
With OFBIZ-9826 we have introduced a "Duplicate Se
Hi,
With OFBIZ-9826 we have introduced a "Duplicate Service ECA" warning.
I see a lot of them in log when running integration test[1].
Is it not time to take care of removing those duplicates, or is it a side
effect due to tests?
Thanks
[1]
Le 30/04/2020 à 14:08, Werner Brasch a écrit :
Hallo
I have set the column jdbcPassword In the entity TenantDataSource to
encrypt="true" and it seems to work. It is possible to work on the new tenant.
But I don't know how the Security works, is the jdbcPassword now save, how does
it works?
Hi Vemula,
Your message has been moderated, else it would not have reach this Mailing List.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on the
Severity:
Important
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz 17.12.01
Description:
Apache OFBiz is vulnerable to Host header injection by accepting arbitrary hosts
Mitigation:
Upgrade to 17.12.03 or manually apply the commit at OFBIZ-11583
Credit:
Pradeep
Felicitations Rishi!
Jacques
Le 28/04/2020 à 17:46, Swapnil M Mane a écrit :
Many congratulations Rishi, welcome on board!
- Best regards,
Swapnil M Mane,
ofbiz.apache.org
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:53 PM Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
The OFBiz PMC has invited
version we are
not sending these fields.
Tests will pass for sure, as they are not mandatory to send.
--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
Senior Technical Consultant
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:52 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi Suraj,
If you mean that there i
Hi Ravi,
I agree with Michael,
Most of "that" you should go to Wiki Attic. By "that" I mean not only the pages you spotted Ravi. Should remain in wiki only what can't get to .adoc
files.
Worse than no documentation is a documentation that is not maintained. That's confusing as hell! So we
ache OFBiz 16.11.07" is the latest release of OFBiz and it is probably
going to be the last one in the 16.11 series"
So I think we are good and you can proceed.
Jacopo
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:20 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Thanks Jacopo,
Bu
Hi Suraj,
If you mean that there is no explanation but "Tests pass", as it's Svn we can
still amend it, what would you suggest?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 27/04/2020 à 08:47, Suraj Khurana a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
I think we missed the note, comments field during conversion in this commit.
Is it
r 26, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi,
I think we should clearly/officially states that R16 is no longer
supported.
How did we do that the last time, Jacopo?
If nobody is against I'll then remove the references to R16 in Jira
Thanks
Jacques
+1
just wonder about the REST and GraphQL part. GirishI know you have some
knowledge about that. What do you think?
Jacques
Le 26/04/2020 à 17:29, Girish Vasmatkar a écrit :
Hi Ritesh -
This is certainly going to be a great initiative. +1
Best,
Girish
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 8:49 PM
Hi,
I think we should clearly/officially states that R16 is no longer supported.
How did we do that the last time, Jacopo?
If nobody is against I'll then remove the references to R16 in Jira
Thanks
Jacques
, not much changes to be done after this information from Rishi.
Thanks everyone.
--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
SENIOR TECHNICAL CONSULTANT
mobile: +91 9669750002
email: suraj.khur...@hotwax.co
*www.hotwax.co <http://www.hotwax.co/>*
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:22 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jac
Hi All,
Please follow rather the similar user thread
Swapnil M Mane created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20189 for
the demos issue
Jacques
Le 25/04/2020 à 11:57, Dikpal Kanungo a écrit :
Yes, not able to access demo instances.
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/
Le 24/04/2020 à 13:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 21/04/2020 à 16:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
-On which word processing software (WORD, EXCEL) is it possible to export data to the CRM?
Forgot to answer this one, this should help
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Export
Le 21/04/2020 à 16:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
-On which word processing software (WORD, EXCEL) is it possible to export data to the CRM?
Forgot to answer this one, this should help
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Export+to+Excel
Jacques
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:39 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi,
It was mate, actually there was a missing word in my saying, I meant:
I agree about changing only non idempotent classes in a 1st approach.
That's obviously _NOT_ service and events, but c
The OFBiz PMC has invited Swapnil M Mane to become member of the committee and
we are glad to announce that he has accepted the nomination.
On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Le 22/04/2020 à 19:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I have still to read the articles an understand the Lombok project and
how we could possibly use it
I'm thinking about https://projectlombok.org/setup/gradle but I have no
ideas yet to what it e
Le 22/04/2020 à 19:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I have still to read the articles an understand the Lombok project and how we
could possibly use it
I'm thinking about https://projectlombok.org/setup/gradle but I have no ideas
yet to what it entails, someone knows?
Jacques
Hi,
I agree about changing only non idempotent classes in a 1st approach.
That's obviously service and events, but could be also few helper and worker
classes.
We need to check the later and decide one by one. And if they are not idempotent then they should not be called helper or worker. Or
Sorry I missed Girish 1st name in subject :/
Le 22/04/2020 à 11:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
The OFBiz PMC has invited Girish to become a new committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Girish is part of the community for near 2 years and has proposed several smart
The OFBiz PMC has invited Girish to become a new committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Girish is part of the community for near 2 years and has proposed several smart
propositions notably related to security and GraphQL, but not only.
Please join me in welcoming and
The OFBiz PMC has invited James Young to become member of the committee and we
are glad to announce that he has accepted the nomination.
On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
Le 21/04/2020 à 16:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Also have a look at
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/example/control/ExampleOsmGeoLocationPointSet1
Forgot credential: admin/ofbiz
Hi Paul,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on the ML.
The wider the audience the better the answers
+1, works for me on Windows 7
verify-ofbiz-release.sh OK
init-gradle-wrapper OK
Both UIs (back and front ends) OK
Integration tests OK (no errors at all after a second test, had in 1st)
Jacques
Le 21/04/2020 à 10:35, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
+1
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
Hi Taher,
I did not understand the points as options but as a sequence of actions, Jacopo?
Jacques
Le 20/04/2020 à 14:04, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
I would recommend options 2/3. There is no need for a vote, just a release with
a note about 17.12.0 and archive it
On Monday, April 20, 2020
BTW, I'm disappointed that montastic.com did not send an alert. I even tried
when it was done from their UI, to no avail :/
I thought it was working OK since we received number of alerts when old was R13
and not stable.
Jacques
Le 20/04/2020 à 10:22, Christian Geisert a écrit :
Uh, that's
+1
Thanks Deepak, crossed that yesterday evening too. It was just published then:
https://plugins.gradle.org/plugin/at.bxm.svntools
Jacques
Le 20/04/2020 à 09:36, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
+1 sounds good to me.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
ofbiz.apache.org
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:58
Hi,
With OFBIZ-11598 I have refactored to avoid to have the size hardcoded in
several places.
I see no reasons to use the default size (10KB) when we have now machines with
GBs and need at least 1GB for OFBiz to run.
If it's OK for everyone to increase the size to 1MB I'll do in a week.
Hi Vinay,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on the ML.
The wider the audience the better the answers
Hi Swapnil,
It seems Infra missed tools in INFRA-20007?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 14/04/2020 à 14:21, GitBox a écrit :
swapnilmmane merged pull request #3: Documented: Updated instance details in
README file
URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/pull/3
+1, works for me
verify-ofbiz-release.sh OK
Both UIs (back and front ends) OK
Integration tests OK. I have just the same 4 failures I got recently with R17: 3 productPrice-tests and
category-tests.testGetProductCategoryAndLimitedMembers fails. That's is only Windows, works on Buildbot.
Le 01/04/2020 à 14:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 01/04/2020 à 10:21, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
@Jacopo: also the final READMEs in 17.12.01 is adapted to the gradlew
download thing, should the R17 not be so?
IMO we should update R17 as well as all the relevant branches (including
trunk
hides it. So I'll create another
Jira for that.
And last but not least I have created: OFBIZ-11585 "Update security.adoc with few
words about our CSRF defense strategy"
Jacques
Le 04/04/2020 à 21:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi James,
The backports in R18 and R17 went well but for
Hi James,
The backports in R18 and R17 went well but for RequestHandler.java
We will need to do the merge by hand. I'll begin and let you know
Later...
Jacques
Le 04/04/2020 à 19:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi James, All,
Done, the CSRF defense is in trunk and I'll backport it ASAP
.
Regards,
James
On 2020/04/04 13:10:18, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi James,
1. I like the idea. Maybe we could create the class but let the
implementation (with explanations) for those who really need it?
2. I did not mean there was a correlation between csrf-token check and auth
check. My
, we can implement another ICsrfDefenseStrategy
class or modify the existing CsrfDefenseStrategy class.
Regards,
James
On 2020/03/27 18:16:58, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi All,
Before I create a PR as a last opportunity to allow reviews and tests, I'd like
to ask 2 last questions:
1. should we not
lot of
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access this resource.
in GitBox, once Daniel (Gruno) told me it was "normal". So we are dependent on
GitHub if we don't have a local clone at hand :/
Regards,
Michael
Am 01.04.20 um 10:33 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi Michael,
Yes
Le 01/04/2020 à 10:21, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
@Jacopo: also the final READMEs in 17.12.01 is adapted to the gradlew
download thing, should the R17 not be so?
IMO we should update R17 as well as all the relevant branches (including
trunk) AND remove the wrapper binaries from all of them.
Jacques
Le 01/04/2020 à 10:23, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Just look at your backport commit fad06400e26c9b557b90c88dda5914b89794347b and
answer yourself ;-)
Michael
Am 01.04.20 um 10:17 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi All,
Is there a reason why we have README.md AND README.adoc in R17?
@Jacopo: also
Hi All,
Is there a reason why we have README.md AND README.adoc in R17?
@Jacopo: also the final READMEs in 17.12.01 is adapted to the gradlew download
thing, should the R17 not be so?
Thanks
Jacques
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11269
HTH
Jacques
Le 31/03/2020 à 18:02, Pierre Smits a écrit :
There is a ticket.
Op di 31 mrt. 2020 17:50 schreef Michael Brohl :
Hi everyone,
is someone working on an update of the repository information at
haven't gone into too much detail, so my understanding on this is
limited. However, from what I understood, same-site has the ability to
become an all-in-one solution for CSRF attacks provided browsers honour it.
Best,
Girish
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.l
continue to work on the remaining 195 cases where auth="false"...
HTH
Jacques
Le 27/03/2020 à 19:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi All,
Before I create a PR as a last opportunity to allow reviews and tests, I'd like
to ask 2 last questions:
1. should we not use a JWT rather than a (pseudo)
Hi All,
Before I create a PR as a last opportunity to allow reviews and tests, I'd like
to ask 2 last questions:
1. should we not use a JWT rather than a (pseudo) random value for the CSRF
token, this for timeout reason? Don't get me wrong I'm sure that the
random values generated by
were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push:
new 11c0ce6 Improved: no functional change
11c0ce6 is described below
commit 11c0ce6d55b9ffc0124354bae8f5d9746bf5681e
Author: Jacques Le Roux
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 24 18:31:54 2020 +0100
Improved: no functional change
Adds /uploads/ i
Le 20/03/2020 à 08:44, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
If we do so, I have a question. With NoCsrfDefenseStrategy we have the possibility to bypass the CSRF defense. It's convenient for development,
because else, in this mode, the CSRF defense is quite intrusive. *
I propose to use it also in demo
instance are mentioned in Jira comment at
https://s.apache.org/o95vx
Please have a look and let me know your kind feedback.
Thank you so much Jacques Le Roux for your inputs and guidance in this.
- Best regards,
Swapnil M Mane,
ofbiz.apache.org
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 9:29 PM Swapnil M Mane wrote
situation, a lot of people will have more urgent problems to solve at the moment.
Thanks,
Michael
Am 20.03.20 um 08:44 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi,
I initially said I'd wait a month, it will be 24 days next Monday and I don't
expect much more activity now.
So, if nobody disagree, this weekend
not in development mode. Please verify it's OK with you before we
apply the plan above.
Here I want to thank James for his good work again
Jacques
Le 15/03/2020 à 19:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi All,
If you are interested to test, manually or with the tool of you choice, you can
do so at https
Forget it,
Was in the context of Qualys
Le 18/03/2020 à 08:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I got this weirs error somehow and I don't clearly remember when and where. So
I don't want to create a Jira.
Just asking if someone ever got the same or has an idea about it, else please
neglect
Hi,
I got this weirs error somehow and I don't clearly remember when and where. So
I don't want to create a Jira.
Just asking if someone ever got the same or has an idea about it, else please
neglect
Note: maybe it was in the context of using a penetration tool. Like sending an abnormally
ailto:jler...@apache.org>> wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jleroux pushed a commit to branch trunk
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz-plugins.git
commit 9f87efe7ba035febcb5aa4f827a62de3316ecbab
Author:
Oops, right indeed, I did not think about the anon checkout flow in ecommerce.
I think I'll duplicate and make one only false in ecommerce
Jacques
Le 16/03/2020 à 09:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Deepak,
Yes, I wondered about that too, but in which case/s do you think
escribed below
commit e72e1348c13f892cfbd3ffdb78f536c4e4aa6b68
Author: Jacques Le Roux mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>>
AuthorDate: Sat Mar 14 08:49:54 2020 +0100
Improved: "auth" should be true for all the request url used for
Application
component
it :)
Enjoy
Jacques
Le 09/03/2020 à 17:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Girish,
I just had a look with Zap. As a note: Zap reports missing CSRF tokens in forms when there are actually present in the URL. This is explained by
the point 3 of OFBIZ-11306 description (Freemarker handling).
Jacques
Hi,
Someone will handle it?
Jacques
Le 06/03/2020 à 10:34, Swapnil M Mane a écrit :
Hello team,
Current we have three demo instances [1] for OFBiz.
-- Current Stable Release 16.11 - Demo
https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr/control/main
-- Developer Trunk - Demo
Le 14/03/2020 à 10:00, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Thank you Jacques,
it looks good now apart from one detail; see inline:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:29 AM wrote:
[...]
- Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
+ Copyright 2001-2008 The Apache Software Foundation
Since this section
lus+GIT+VS+JIRA+plus+GIT, read
carefully, check, dicuss and ask questions to get to a good information base for an important decision to make.
Thanks everyone,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 12.03.20 um 17:28 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
You are all invited to review, discuss in
o ask contributors to manually
squash their commits before committing the lot again (always in a new PR?)
and ask Infra to also remove this option. Opinions?
Jacques
Le 13/03/2020 à 14:48, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi All,
This is done, you may check with an open GH PR
We will now ask Infra to ad
Hi All,
This is done, you may check with an open GH PR
We will now ask Infra to add GH Issues[1]. It needs again a PMC agreement.
[1]
https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/creating-an-issue
Jacques
Le 10/03/2020 à 11:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
The infra team
Le 13/03/2020 à 11:40, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:33 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
[...]
I have asked at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19950 if we
could have GH issues.
Yes, I saw your comment but I am wondering if t
Le 13/03/2020 à 11:29, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:20 PM Pierre Smits
wrote:
[...]
As for PMC Members claiming that the Github services (repositories etc.)
are not *official* ASF tools, I suggest these persons stop this kind of FUD
(and maybe check back with the
, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 12/03/2020 à 13:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 12/03/2020 à 12:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
As I see no Jira references in "Release Distribution Policy&qu
Le 12/03/2020 à 13:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 12/03/2020 à 12:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
As I see no Jira references in "Release Distribution Policy" I guess it's
not an issue
Le 12/03/2020 à 12:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
As I see no Jira references in "Release Distribution Policy" I guess it's
not an issue to no longer use Jira to manage versions and rele
Le 12/03/2020 à 11:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 12/03/2020 à 10:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Pro:
1. More devs know GH than Jira and it has been created for them (when using
Git). They like it, we need them.
2. Simple things are easy to directly push with the PR commit button (w
Le 12/03/2020 à 10:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Pro:
1. More devs know GH than Jira and it has been created for them (when using
Git). They like it, we need them.
2. Simple things are easy to directly push with the PR commit button (w/
forced rebase and merge). For large or complicate
Le 12/03/2020 à 11:40, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:32 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
[...]
6. GH has intrinsically tools to version and release (it's a dev tool not
a reporting tool). Please Jacopo confirm since you are the r
Le 12/03/2020 à 10:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
It then offers the same possibilities than Jira (which adapted)
It then offers the same possibilities than Jira (which adapted during its
evolution)
Jacques
Le 12/03/2020 à 09:53, Samuel Trégouët a écrit :
Hi Michael,
To justify the need of making a change, to me the question is quite the
opposite: what does GitHub offer which Jira does not in the domain of
contributing/ project management/ issue tracking?
Jira review process is awfull!
I tried
Le 12/03/2020 à 09:12, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
I will just pick out one topic here, see inline:
Am 12.03.20 um 08:32 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
The most important question to answer is: what does Jira offers that GH does not?
To justify the need of making a change, to me
Le 11/03/2020 à 16:29, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Jacques Le Roux writes:
Le 11/03/2020 à 12:33, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
This said you certainly saw this thread started by Pierre Smits:
https://markmail.org/message/so7ljoqxzuq7jplz and the related wiki
document
https://cwiki.apache.org
another story :).
Le 11/03/2020 à 17:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 11/03/2020 à 17:08, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Mathieu,
inline...
Inline too...
Am 11.03.20 um 16:29 schrieb Mathieu Lirzin:
- Adopt Github Pull Request (PR) as the unique channel for code contribution
-1
I don't see
Le 11/03/2020 à 17:08, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Mathieu,
inline...
Inline too...
Am 11.03.20 um 16:29 schrieb Mathieu Lirzin:
- Adopt Github Pull Request (PR) as the unique channel for code contribution
-1
I don't see a reason why we should not allow patches also. It will make it
into the habit of
linearizing history, meaning always rebasing and clean history before
merging into trunk.
I guess the GH merge button option "Rebase and merge" is what we are looking to
enforce with the request to Infra, right?
--
Jacques Le Roux
400E Chemin de la Mouline
34560 Poussan
04 67 5
Le 11/03/2020 à 12:33, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
This said you certainly saw this thread started by Pierre Smits:
https://markmail.org/message/so7ljoqxzuq7jplz and the related wiki
document
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributing+via+Git+and+Github
AIUI this page is
Le 11/03/2020 à 11:46, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
Here is a first answer on the specific point of the commit notification
issue.
Jacques Le Roux writes:
I noticed that sometimes strange things happen when you use a
PR. Consider this recent email for instance:
https
Hi Michael,
To be totally honest, this time it's not an intrinsic Buidbot issue, it just
could not grab a resource ;)
This does not excuse the cases where it fails on integration tests when they pass locally. With machines working almost 100% all time it's not a
surprise though.
Jacques
Le
The infra team requires a PMC decision for this change, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19950
Jacques
Le 10/03/2020 à 10:57, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 09/03/2020 à 17:58, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello,
The history of OFBiz trunk with the adoption of the Pull Request
Le 09/03/2020 à 17:58, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello,
The history of OFBiz trunk with the adoption of the Pull Request based
contribution process is getting less and less readable. Here is a
snippet of `git log --oneline --graph` demonstrating that:
--8<---cut
know how it goes with ZAP.
Best,
Girish
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 3:30 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi All,
This is my 1st weekly reminder :)
As you may know CSRF attacks are very bad. TL;DR: They are hard to provoke
but once you are able to create one, mostly using social engineering
uld explain why all
the commits from PR31 were merged as well.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 13:32, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Done, please check I did not miss anything. I was a bit confused because
when I merged PR31 it seem PR37 was automatically merged too.
If all is OK I'll conti
Hi Daniel,
Done, please check I did not miss anything. I was a bit confused because when I
merged PR31 it seem PR37 was automatically merged too.
If all is OK I'll continue on OFBIZ-4035
Thanks
Jacques
Le 06/03/2020 à 18:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel, All,
At https
Hi Swapnil,
Exactly my thoughts, +1
Jacques
Le 06/03/2020 à 10:34, Swapnil M Mane a écrit :
Hello team,
Current we have three demo instances [1] for OFBiz.
-- Current Stable Release 16.11 - Demo
https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr/control/main
-- Developer Trunk - Demo
Thanks Ravi,
This is a demo configuration problem (not an issue locally).
Please create a Jira for that, here is the related log on trunk demo:
2020-03-07 10:43:01,506 |27.0.0.1-8009-exec-1 |SolrProductSearch |E| Connect to localhost:8443 [localhost/127.0.0.1] failed: Connection
Le 07/03/2020 à 10:42, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 7:31 PM Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi Gil,
If that other function ( createATPRequirementsForOrder service) has been in
play since 2007, we can, i would say safely, assume that the
createRequirementFromItemATP function/service
mber*
Apache Incubator<https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
Apache Steve<https://steve.apache.org>, committer
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:28 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
For those interested, it's maybe easier to test to simply apply the last
patches (fram
Hi Daniel, All,
At https://markmail.org/message/ahu6kz7dihcyp45z you asked
"How do committers decide which features to backport to 18.12?"
I (roughly) answered
"The rule is normally we only backport bug fixes, obviously to avoid regression. But if nobody disagree for simple new
Le 05/03/2020 à 14:26, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Kelvin it's the nickname for Elvis ?
Ah(?), OK
Jacques
1001 - 1100 of 24454 matches
Mail list logo
