done?
3) Should the existing pages with content from
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Role-Oriented+Task+Instructions+for+Users
be retained as a starting point for cleaning this up.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
s
It was already there.
Ron
On 17/02/2015 9:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have committed at r1660392
Jacques
Le 12/02/2015 21:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Yes, but why not Petabyte?
Jacques
Le 12/02/2015 19:39, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Patch suggestion for your consideration
Index
On 17/02/2015 3:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 16/02/2015 23:36, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Wow!
I would love to see the test plan for the order module!
What is the best guess as to the coverage of the current test suites
for OFBiz (percent of functions tested)?
We where near to have those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14324241#comment-14324241
]
Ron Wheeler commented on OFBIZ-6059:
Patch attached
> UOM missing 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler updated OFBIZ-6059:
---
Attachment: UnitData.xml.patch
> UOM missing 2 entr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler closed OFBIZ-6021.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Confusing but that is the way it works!
> Part Demo Data is unnecessar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler closed OFBIZ-6029.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Extension is held elsewhere
> Telecom Number is missing the extens
occasional community discussion.
Ron
On 16/02/2015 5:51 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
I suggest to do one jira at a time.
Op maandag 16 februari 2015 heeft Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> het volgende geschreven:
On 2/16/2015 2:36 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Wow!
I would love
:
Here is an example: applications/order/testdef/data/QuoteTestData.xml
Jacques
Le 16/02/2015 19:57, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Is there any test data for the system?
The demo data (that I have found) does not contain most of the fields
available for each entity type.
I have been looking for
Manufacturing.
Is there a place where developers get the data to run acceptance tests?
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ot;DATA_MEASURE"/>
uomId="DATA_KB" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
uomId="DATA_MB" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@
conversionFactor="1024"/>
conversionFactor="1024"/>
conversionF
tools.
I am not sure where this small section should fit in the overall design
of the Wiki.
Under the discussions about project management and organization and in
the wiki management section.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype
ot;
Maybe we should think otherwise and remove all things in the wiki
which might not been ALWAYS maintained.
From this conversation I begin to wonder if it's not the right
solution. Keep the documentation as simple as possible!
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee.
e list is similar in that most foreign addresses are the database server.
Does anyone know where I can find the code that opens them and more
importantly what effect closing them might have on OFbiz functionality?
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.c
going to be a meeting to kick off the process?
Ron
On 11/02/2015 5:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 11/02/2015 21:14, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
On 11/02/2015 1:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 09/02/2015 15:10, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
On 09/02/2015 5:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 06/02/2015
On 11/02/2015 1:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 09/02/2015 15:10, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
On 09/02/2015 5:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 06/02/2015 17:27, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I would like to see more releases with smaller deltas so that the
trunk can be a bit more open to work where
On 09/02/2015 5:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 06/02/2015 17:27, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
On 06/02/2015 10:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 05/02/2015 15:41, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Releases are stable.
Things that are not released are mutable.
The use of unconventional conventions should be
On 06/02/2015 10:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 05/02/2015 15:41, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Releases are stable.
Things that are not released are mutable.
The use of unconventional conventions should be stopped as soon as
possible.
+1! Thanks Ron, I'd hope that people express more
ue.
I thought that I was supporting your plan but you comment has me a bit
baffled.
Ron
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 2/5/2015 6:41 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Releases are stable.
Things that are not released are mutable.
The use of unconventional conventions shou
ww.orrtiz.com <http://www.orrtiz.com/>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ron Wheeler
<mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com>> wrote:
I think that they are showing search results as the user types and
the ERP does not care what field you are entering.
If you start typing in the
1. OFBIZ-6059 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059>
UnitData.xml
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
were left out when PB was added.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler updated OFBIZ-6059:
---
Description:
<
were left out when PB was added.
was:
were left out when PB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler updated OFBIZ-6059:
---
Summary: UOM missing 2 entries (was: RB UOM missing 2 entries)
> UOM missing 2 entr
Ron Wheeler created OFBIZ-6059:
--
Summary: RB UOM missing 2 entries
Key: OFBIZ-6059
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
.12 branch, which is pretty new and still needs to
undergo to the stabilization process: in this way it will be easier
to maintain it (by backporting the fixes) in the future years.
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwhe
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6036
By and large there are more possibilities in this area, cf
http://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org/example/control/FormWidgetExamples
Jacques
Le 04/02/2015 23:43, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 04/02/2015 16:02, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
http://post.technologyevaluation.com/t
The countryGeoId seems to be the ISO-3166-1 3 character code.
Is this true?
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
parsed another time to get the 3 pieces that OFBiz wants.
rel-entity-name="ContactMech">
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Softw
ications that can be downloaded.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
This was posted in the DITA users forum.
Sounds like a pretty nice setup for managing software documentation and
marketing materials..
I use DITA and topic-based authoring for manuals and for analysis
reports for clients.
It does help a lot.
The difficulty of using topic-based authoring in t
Ron Wheeler created OFBIZ-6029:
--
Summary: Telecom Number is missing the extension
Key: OFBIZ-6029
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6029
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
ian Crum wrote:
Ron,
It would have been less typing to make the changes on your local copy
and then submit a patch.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/20/2015 12:34 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
I see a couple of grammar errors and some small quibbles about wording.
"it
rc/test/java/org/ofbiz/product/
What do you think?
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ry-layout.html
More specifically I would like to switch from, for example:
script/org/ofbiz/product/
src/org/ofbiz/product/
src/org/ofbiz/product/test/
to:
src/main/java/org/ofbiz/product/
src/main/minilang/org/ofbiz/product/
src/main/groovy/...
src/test/java/org/ofbiz/product/
What do you
ory-layout.html
More specifically I would like to switch from, for example:
script/org/ofbiz/product/
src/org/ofbiz/product/
src/org/ofbiz/product/test/
to:
src/main/java/org/ofbiz/product/
src/main/minilang/org/ofbiz/product/
src/main/groovy/...
src/test/java/org/ofbiz/product/
What do you thi
Ron Wheeler created OFBIZ-6021:
--
Summary: Part Demo Data is unnecessarily confusing
Key: OFBIZ-6021
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6021
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
position.
+
+Usage
+
+
+
+Navigate the HR Organization to view departments,
positions and
+people
+
+
+
+Add or remove a department
+
+
+
+Add a person
+
+
+
+Quickly open the profile of any item in the tree
+
+
+
+If the item is a position you can add a person to
fulfill the
+position
+
+
+
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
/test/java/org/ofbiz/product/
What do you think?
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14282960#comment-14282960
]
Ron Wheeler commented on OFBIZ-6015:
Topic-based writing seems like a good wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14282598#comment-14282598
]
Ron Wheeler commented on OFBIZ-4941:
Separate the documentation into a sub-pro
d down with patches at this time.
{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
x27;s available
and kind of included with Confluence at the ASF.
But since Graphviz is open source and use the "Eclipse Public License
- v 1.0" I see no problems using it, instead of Gliffy
Jacques
Le 16/01/2015 15:54, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/
On 15/01/2015 6:23 PM, Youssef Khaye wrote:
Please see inline
Le 15/01/2015 23:21, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I my research about data loading and the data model, I have come
across may interesting things.
There are also some questions that I have not been able to answer.
1) In entitymodel.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14280480#comment-14280480
]
Ron Wheeler commented on OFBIZ-4941:
http://www.slideshare.net/wapxana/documenta
would be harder to create and
maintain as relationship are added and removed from the application.
I have added a child page called "Drawing Source" with the source for
the image and instructions about how to regenerate the drawing.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software
="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2000-01-01
00:00:00.000"/>
Is there some place where the uses of these types are documented?
Where loaded in the seed data?
If I change this to contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAY_LOCATION"will this
cause problems for code.
Ron
--
Ron Wheele
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
have to download another one or some other
tools/integrations from the download page of eclipse?
thanks
Davide
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
, I'm not in my home ;) ) but I
see countryGeoId and countyGeoId .
I miss a trivial information ?
Nicolas
Le 13/01/2015 22:11, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
PostalAddress has
defined twice.
eProvince" rel-entity-name="Geo">
rel-entity-name="Geo">
rel-entity-name="Geo">
rel-entity-name="GeoPoint">
rel-entity-name="PartyIdentificationType">
rel-entity-name="Party">
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Apache+OFBiz+Project+Overview
could be eliminated since it only contains a link to the ofbiz.apache.org.
Might be worth keeping to stop other from creating a new one but the
comments should be deleted if it is kept.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
/display/OFBADMIN/Press+Releases
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
This looks like a page that should be deleted.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ou want to move it to
before you do the move, you can use the "Recently Viewed" link (on the
left hand side) which should show a list of pages.
6) Once you've selected the new parent page, click 'Move' again
If you have any problems or need any other help then please le
these potential children.
At the end, I hope to have the whole story about handling external data
in one place with an introduction.
I have to start reading code and sample data to verify the information
in these pages and to understand what it should say.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact
#x27;ll be looking on next.
Thanks
Sharan
On 13/01/2015 10:35, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I agree we should move it to the Wiki
Jacopo
On Jan 12, 2015, at 8:19 PM, Ron Wheeler
wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Demo+and+Test+Setup+Guide
Why is this in OFB
ller request was typically the ajax one to "FindPartyName" which was used as
part of the party lookup field in that form. The net result, was that on success it would render the PartyName instead
of replaying the EditPartyRelationships. Changed form "view-last" to "view&q
<
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
I guess David decided to put it there to avoid this document to be
modified by non committers
From my POV it could be moved to the open wiki indeed
Before I will update the links...
Jacques
Le 12/01/2015 20:19, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.or
12/01/2015 3:19 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I guess David decided to put it there to avoid this document to be
modified by non committers
From my POV it could be moved to the open wiki indeed
Before I will update the links...
Jacques
Le 12/01/2015 20:19, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Demo+and+Test+Setup+Guide
Why is this in OFBIZ Project Administration Workspace.
Should it not go in the OFBiz (Open For Business) Project Open Wiki ?
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
Thanks Adrian.
On 10/01/2015 3:07 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Those pages are in the last category - they are interesting ideas that
never happened but are worth keeping on-line.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/10/2015 12:03 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
If someone who
er refer to them than this now deprecated
workspace.
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 22:53, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I think we can remove this page
Jacques
Le 26/11/2014 15:12, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Open+Standards+for+OFBiz
This page appears
:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Documentation-tools-documentation-tp4659862p4660987.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
Roux wrote:
So you prefer R13.01 w/ only the ecommerce component in
specialpurpose, why?
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 20:32, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I would say "no" if that is the only question being asked.
We can have the discussion about how to support individual modules
later if you want t
omponents
back in R13.07 or not?"
It's not planning something new here, just cleaning our mess!
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 17:28, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
This is the kind of discussion that I am hoping to avoid with option 4.
Let the community decide and show their choice by a willingness t
work of the committers
(backporting) but we are still discussing this and they may stay or go away;
most of all, they will probably not be part of any release.
Jacopo
Jacques
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
not rely only on Jira, at least it's a start.
Jacques
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ialpurpose components (exclude them all apart
from ecommerce as we did in 13.07, include some of them selectively etc...) I
would temporarily include them all, and when we will have a clear plan of
action we will adjust the branch accordingly.
Any objections?
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
Presiden
anyone
who wants to create a Graphviz image for the wiki.)
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
iew this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Discussion-Project-Vision-Direction-and-Roadmap-tp4659591p4659611.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwh
On 28/11/2014 10:14 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Yeah I understood that. Deleting simply means it won't be available
in future releases. It wouldn't suddenly disappear out of
pre-existing releases.
Got it.
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ron Wheeler
<mailto:rwhe
ource users make
these types of decisions on a regular basis.
Your statement is generally are correct but in this context, it related
to the suggestion about (#5) deleting Asset Management from OFBiz.
Regards
Scott
On 29 Nov 2014 14:51, "Ron Wheeler" wrote:
Don't forget to get
ded back to the ASF repo.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/28/2014 4:01 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
The components not supported as part of the core and framework would not
leave Apache.
They become separate sub-projects under OFBiz so that they stay in the
commun
occur and to
support anyone who wants to try to start a sub-project that makes sense.
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Ron Wheeler <
rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote:
On 28/11/2014 5:49 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Ron, we get that you really like the idea of sub-pr
fort to achieve a good result.
There is nothing to stop anyone from doing a private fork but I don't
think that this is a good long-term plan and does nothing to build the
OFBiz community or reduce the workload on the current team.
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Ron Wheeler
at requires MORE
resources. So the suggestion was made to spin them off to separate projects
where they can stand or fall on their own. The sub-project idea (as far as
I can tell) is dead.
What part of that aren't you understanding?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
interest in being a "chair of a sub-PMC."
Who would you be willing to have as leader and chief architect?
Ron
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/28/2014 4:12 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Can someone on the PMC or a current committer find out what has to be
done to
14 4:12 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Can someone on the PMC or a current committer find out what has to be
done to set up an Apacahe sub-project in terms of administration (might
be nothing) and fixing the SCM access so that committers to the
sub-project are not required to be committers to the core and
rious
versions of OFBiz will be decided by the Asset Maintenance community.
If the spin-off is a success, then all is good. If it fails, then the
Asset Maintenance component is added back to the ASF repo.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/28/2014 4:01 PM, Ron Wheeler
Le 28/11/2014 17:01, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
The components not supported as part of the core and framework would
not leave Apache.
They become separate sub-projects under OFBiz so that they stay in
the community but are released and supported separately so that there
is more transparency abo
t a problem. Can we discuss with the board in case,
instead of
hiding behind unknown numbers?
Jacques
Ron
On 13/11/2014 3:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 13/11/2014 20:03, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Does this solve ASF's issue about having users access the main
servers?
I don't t
release with a
full warranty.
Ron
On 28/11/2014 10:30 AM, gil portenseigne wrote:
First I might be a bit confuse in this email, sorry for that, quite
ideas came up while writing it, some organization missing.
Le 28/11/2014 14:31, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
What is the downside if the non-core
If we do decide to use DITA, you may find that that posts on my web site
might give some ideas about editing and SCM for DITA using Eclipse.
http://blog.artifact-software.com/tech/?tag=dita
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype
trunk
also. I'd now tend to avoid differences between trunk and branch
releases, at the functionality or other levels.
I agree that the same settings should be maintained in the trunk
and in the release branches.
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-
from a release or vice versa.
For the point 2 we need to clarify if it could applies to trunk
also. I'd now tend to avoid differences between trunk and branch
releases, at the functionality or other levels.
I agree that the same settings should be maintained in the trunk
and in the relea
amount of Mb's with the size of the zip file.
That
difference is what is saved on storage and transfer cost of trunk
code.
Now multiply that with the number of branches you had in mind.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 13 nov. 2014 om 22:32 heeft Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts
he point 2 we need to clarify if it could applies to trunk also. I'd now
tend to avoid differences between trunk and branch releases, at the
functionality or other levels.
I agree that the same settings should be maintained in the trunk and in the
release branches.
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheel
)
the content will be validated we will re-add them.
Jacopo
On Nov 27, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and remove
any references to it.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/OFBiz+End+User+Docs+Home
It
before i bought )
Can everybody tell me where i do wrong and how to fix it
Thanks
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
current form.
It hurts the image of the project to have it linked from the front page
of the documentation as our"User Documentation".
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ndex
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index>)
Some seems to be technical docs.
I am not sure how much is useful for understanding current technical
state but perhaps some of the more knowledgeable members could sort some
of this out.
open up to options like
the one of having a component where the data model is defined and
where core services are defined (for setups where only the framework
and data model are required).
+1
Jacques
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact
p file. That
difference is what is saved on storage and transfer cost of trunk code.
Now multiply that with the number of branches you had in mind.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 13 nov. 2014 om 22:32 heeft Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> het volgende geschreven:
Le 13/11
I don't know anything but I will help wherever ignorance is some sort of
advantage to the process.
Ron
On 14/11/2014 9:13 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
You'll be the first?
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 14 nov. 2014 om 14:26 heeft Ron Wheeler het
volgende geschreven:
Can we start by
hes you had in mind.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 13 nov. 2014 om 22:32 heeft Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> het volgende geschreven:
Le 13/11/2014 21:25, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Is it Apache's concern that while people may be free to choose, ASF
server capa
7arts.com> het volgende geschreven:
Le 13/11/2014 21:25, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Is it Apache's concern that while people may be free to choose, ASF
server capacity is not free nor unlimited?
I doubt that OFBiz really puts a big load on the ASF
infrastructure but
users are not suppose
Roux
het volgende geschreven:
Le 13/11/2014 21:25, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Is it Apache's concern that while people may be free to choose, ASF server
capacity is not free nor unlimited?
I doubt that OFBiz really puts a big load on the ASF infrastructure but users
are not supposed to be d
rrors.
That may be the practical side of Apache's urging to get the releases
following their guidelines.
Ron
On 13/11/2014 3:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 13/11/2014 20:03, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Does this solve ASF's issue about having users access the main servers?
I don&#x
201 - 300 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
