That is the policy.
Regards
Scott
On 14/09/2011, at 10:58 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
> Hm your right should it Be reverted?
>
> Am 14.09.2011 um 12:49 schrieb Adrian Crum
> :
>
>> This isn't a bug fix - it is an enhancement.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> On 9/14/2011 11:38 AM, sascharodek...@apache.
Sorry I'm a bit lost, is the latest proposal something like this:
if (widget.properties.enableBoundaryComments == null) {
// widget.properties not set, only show where specified as true
if (context.enableBoundaryComments != null) return
context.enableBoundaryComments;
return false;
12/09/2011, at 10:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> I had also a doubt, but has the process hangs if you don't put them I thought
> it was better to have them there
>
> Jacques
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Any opinions on whether that file should be considered seed data?
Any opinions on whether that file should be considered seed data? I have my
doubts...
Regards
Scott
On 11/09/2011, at 1:09 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Sat Sep 10 13:09:51 2011
> New Revision: 1167510
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1167510&view=rev
> Log:
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz
>
> -David
>
>
> On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>
>> As a side note, if anything seems in the least bit strange to me the first
>> thing I ALWAYS do is to check the revision history for the code in questi
e SVN
Regards
Scott
On 12/09/2011, at 11:14 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Thanks for noticing that Scott. Actually, the change in the trunk is not a
> good one either - for the same reason.
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 9/11/2011 11:50 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi Jacques,
>&
Hi Jacques (and everyone else who does this),
Please avoid littering the freemarker templates with redundant ?if_exists and !
defaults. A quick look at the groovy script makes it pretty clear that
taskCost.task will always be available (since it is the basis for the
preparation) and obviously
Hi Jacques,
Please keep in mind that GenericDelegator methods that return a list do not
actually ever return a null value and in a large number of cases it is both
more efficient and better coding style to just use list.isEmpty(). The only
situation where you need to check for null is if the d
Hi Jacques,
This is not a good backport, changing the service definition could break
deployments that have come to depend on the firstName and lastName being
optional. It's also worth noting that they were made optional intentionally:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?diff_format=l&view=revision&re
On 31/08/2011, at 8:02 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> It's strange actually, I thought I had silently fixed this a few months ago.
> The precedence should be: context -> web.xml -> widget.properties
>
> Jacques, have you tried using the screencsv view handler for the csv proble
It's strange actually, I thought I had silently fixed this a few months ago.
The precedence should be: context -> web.xml -> widget.properties
Jacques, have you tried using the screencsv view handler for the csv problem?
Regards
Scott
On 31/08/2011, at 6:34 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
> There
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 17:38 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Why do you keep commenting out the ant target in build.xml? Removing it
>> prevents compilation on git based checkouts, I already put it back in after
>> you chan
Hi Hans,
Why do you keep commenting out the ant target in build.xml? Removing it
prevents compilation on git based checkouts, I already put it back in after you
changed it last week.
Regards
Scott
On 24/08/2011, at 3:25 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Wed Aug 24 03:25
What does everyone think about moving the ton of demo data living in ecommerce
out to the components where the entities are defined?
My main motivation for asking about this is for testing to ensure that we can
run all the framework and application tests even when all special purpose
components
git doesn't create empty folders, either manually create the folder or remove
the reference to it.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 19/08/2011, at 6:00 AM, Ganath Rathnayake wrote:
> Hi all,
> I get a clone from the [1] and try to build it and got the following error.
>
On 27/07/2011, at 7:50 AM, er...@apache.org wrote:
> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/config/OrderUiLabels.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/config/OrderUiLabels.xml?rev=1151221&r1=1151220&r2=1151221&view=diff
> ==
On 24/07/2011, at 6:56 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> While working on converting a midrange legacy system to OFBiz, I've come up
> with more thoughts on this...
>
> On 3/20/2011 3:33 AM, David E Jones wrote:
>> - Get rid of optional ProductFeature concept (conf/etc products much better
>> model)
>
Hans
>
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 22:32 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanation Hans, what if we put the improvement inside the
>> transform code itself? That way no one would ever have to worry about
>> making a similar ftl change anywhere else.
>>
>
problem when the http switches to https, then
> the 'foreign' hard coded http is not switching.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 20:19 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> This seems a little messy, what are you trying to achieve that th
Hi Hans,
This seems a little messy, what are you trying to achieve that the transform
cannot?
Thanks
Scott
On 24/07/2011, at 3:37 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Sun Jul 24 03:37:20 2011
> New Revision: 1150271
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1150271&view=rev
On 20/07/2011, at 2:48 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 2:40 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 20/07/2011, at 12:31 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/19/2011 1:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>>>> On 20/07/2011, at 12:03 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>&g
On 20/07/2011, at 12:31 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 1:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 20/07/2011, at 12:03 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/19/2011 2:07 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
>>>> On 19/07/2011, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>
>
On 20/07/2011, at 12:03 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 2:07 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 19/07/2011, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Scott.
>>>
>>> On 7/19/2011 12:45 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
>>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>
On 19/07/2011, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Thanks Scott.
>
> On 7/19/2011 12:45 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> Why not replace it with a ProductFeatureContent entity
>> (PK=productFeatureId:contentId:fromDate), that would follow the pattern
Hi Adrian,
Why not replace it with a ProductFeatureContent entity
(PK=productFeatureId:contentId:fromDate), that would follow the pattern
commonly used throughout OFBiz.
Regarding your example, it would seem more appropriate to link your images
directly to the product, I don't see the justific
On 14/07/2011, at 8:12 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 05:50 AM, Ajay Lashkari wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> when we start the ofbiz,
>> it loads framework->applications->specialpurpose and then hot-deploy.
>> so please tell me that if there is a way to change the loading order of
>> there releva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064944#comment-13064944
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4270:
---
Yes I read those posts and that's why I d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13063562#comment-13063562
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4337:
---
A better approach would probably be something
Hi Prince,
This type of thing isn't too difficult to figure out on your own by looking at
the svn history for the jar:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/lib/xpp3_min-1.1.4c.jar?view=log
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 11/07/2011, at 4:50 PM, Prin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13061947#comment-13061947
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4270:
---
Correction, I meant "Why not go ahead...&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13061942#comment-13061942
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4270:
---
With not go ahead with a supporting entity
Just as an FYI, if you use a dataResourceTypeId of URL_RESOURCE then you can
use component style locations that won't break when moved:
component://scrum/data/helpdata/HELP_SCRUM.xml
Regards
Scott
On 8/07/2011, at 2:43 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Fri Jul 8 02:43:11
3. impact modification on exist code
> 4. create service data migration
> 5. update screen
>
> Nicolas
>
> Le 06/07/2011 00:58, Scott Gray a écrit :
>> I'm sure there is an open jira issue around somewhere that is relevant to
>> this discussion.
>>
>&
I'm sure there is an open jira issue around somewhere that is relevant to this
discussion.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 6/07/2011, at 3:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> I would like to hear why the EmailTemplateSetting was emplemented.
> I am also concerned that the curre
to make a request available to all apps shouldn't have to involve
adding that request to every app.
Thanks
Scott
On 29/06/2011, at 2:59 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> please check revision: 1140919 where i removed the
> hardcoded /content/control
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On W
Hi Hans,
I'm not sure I understand, what was preventing it from being used in all
components?
Thanks
Scott
On 29/06/2011, at 1:20 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Wed Jun 29 01:20:24 2011
> New Revision: 1140933
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140933&view=rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056942#comment-13056942
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4270:
---
Hi Paul,
Fair call on the Assocs, obviously
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056746#comment-13056746
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4270:
---
Question, why are we tracking Geo's and G
It was some openjdk compilation issue, I don't remember the details, people
kept complaining so I changed the code. Doesn't really worry me either way, I
just recognized the code so sent you an FYI.
Regards
Scott
On 27/06/2011, at 9:36 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 06/26/2011 04
Bit of back and forth regarding == vs. equals:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=810438
Regards
Scott
On 27/06/2011, at 6:10 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: doogie
> Date: Sun Jun 26 18:10:10 2011
> New Revision: 1139876
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=113987
gards
Scott
On 27/06/2011, at 8:22 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> I tested 9.04 it did not compile, I did not apply. Then I tested 10.04, it
> compiled, I thought it should be done. Same for R11.04
>
> Jacques
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> This wasn't a bug in 10.04, I
This wasn't a bug in 10.04, I really don't like the idea of back porting any
"fixes" without first verifying that it actually needs to be done.
Regards
Scott
On 26/06/2011, at 10:33 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Sun Jun 26 10:33:25 2011
> New Revision: 1139755
>
> URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4306.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Pierre, fixed in r1139521
> Error in disp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4306:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> Error in display of date-time fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4307.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Hi Mirko, thanks for your contribution but I'm afraid there is alre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4314.
-
Resolution: Incomplete
Closing due to lack of response from reporter.
> I have couple of issues w.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054836#comment-13054836
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4318:
---
A 404 error where? The issue description make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4323.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Javier, should be fixed in r1139504. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4323:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> NullpointerException when decorator content is proces
Back porting without testing is still something we think is okay?
Regards
Scott
On 20/06/2011, at 9:27 AM, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch9 while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051678#comment-13051678
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4314:
---
This is likely a data issue, please confirm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4316.
-
Resolution: Invalid
The label widget currently doesn't support disabling encoding, it isn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4317:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> javascript Update button does not work in content, forum message.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4317.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks BJ, I unexpectedly fixed this by removing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051652#comment-13051652
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4318:
---
What problems does this cause? It coul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4297.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Stéphane, fixed in r1134990
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4297:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> updateProductAverageCostOnReceiveInventory doesn't work when QOH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4312.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Sam, fixed in r1134649. The top button worked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4312:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> Go Back button does not take you where expec
Hi Ashish,
According to the service definition in webtools that service does correctly
specify a timestamp type for that attribute. Are you sure that the parameter's
type is entering the service as a String? If so, there would be a framework
level bug causing that to happen because it shouldn
On 9/06/2011, at 12:21 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 08/06/2011 14:04, Scott Gray a écrit :
>> Hi Erwan,
>>
>> Ignore this paragraph since I wrote it will you were making the changes that
>> solved the problem:
>> I agree with Jacopo, I really think the be
doubt it will be enough to resolve this concern about the ASF licensing
> policy.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>
>> Le 08/06/2011 10:07, Scott Gray a écrit :
>>> I'm still not comfortable with the run-tests build t
Hi Erwan,
I'm no ant expert but since run-tests already depends on build I'm not sure
that your new target needs to as well (build might be run twice).
Regards
Scott
On 8/06/2011, at 11:52 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: erwan
> Date: Wed Jun 8 11:52:13 2011
> New Revision: 1133357
>
>
I'm still not comfortable with the run-tests build target automatically
downloading a GPL dependency, I don't think that should've been added without
some sort of indication that it's inline with ASF licensing policies.
Regards
Scott
On 8/06/2011, at 7:50 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Hi Sasc
So from what I can tell the ttl works fine on the testExpire test case but the
call to useAllMemory() doesn't successfully cause the cache to be cleared. I'm
guessing it works fine locally because our systems are slower that the test
server and the other startup threads running cause the ttl to
What do we gain by adding the complications of more progressive enhancement to
the OFBiz UI? Are there some "must have" features that we're missing out on?
I'm not asking because I'm against it, I'm asking because I don't know.
I will be against it if we add complications for only minor gains
Use the simple-map-processor for validation:
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 24/05/2011, at 7:05 AM, risali...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I agree with you but when I did it (probably one year ago) I see
Thanks Hans, much appreciated.
Regards
Scott
On 23/05/2011, at 8:34 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> Hi Scott, setting the default values as input parameters to the service
> is indeed a better solution. We will change it.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 20:06 +1
Hi Hans,
I'm not sure if this is the best approach because it changes the behavior of
all conversions when you are really only intending to round currency
conversions. The default has essentially been changed from no rounding unless
specified to always rounding to 2 decimal places unless a dif
Hi Marco,
We have the conversion framework for converting Strings to BigDecimals so there
is no need to implement a new method for it:
BigDecimal bigDecimal = (BigDecimal) ObjectType.simpleTypeConvert(object,
"BigDecimal", null, locale);
Regards
Scott
On 23/05/2011, at 1:11 AM, mrisal...@apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032976#comment-13032976
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4278:
---
I don't see a reason why it doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4241.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Scott Gray
This appears to be an opentaps specific issue, the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-4273.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Sam, fixed in r1101373.
Word of caution though, that screen was implemented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4273:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> Unable to create virtual products from varia
would satisfy the immediate need, and it could be
> modified or built out further in the future. What do you think?
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 5/6/2011 7:43 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> My first feeling in response to modifying the service definition with REST
>> related eleme
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 5, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Hi Adrian
My limited understanding is that RESTful URLs should point to a data resource
rather than service logic resources. The verbs (HTTP request method) are used
to indicate the type of operation (CRUD) to be performed on the noun (data
object). So you'd have something like a URL that poin
On 3/05/2011, at 2:26 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> On 5/2/11 9:23 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 3/05/2011, at 12:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>> List:
>>> Why is it that David is allowed to advertise continuously about his latest
>>> pet project - t
well and
that discontent is possibly (probably?) what drove him to create Moqui rather
than being criticism for marketing purposes.
> But he's toned that down now, so I think a discussion about using it in the
> OFBiz project is appropriate.
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 5/2/2011 6:
On 3/05/2011, at 12:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> List:
> Why is it that David is allowed to advertise continuously about his latest
> pet project - that has nothing to do with OFBiz - on this mailing list and
> others, such as myself can't even mention a resource dedicated entirely to
> OFBiz,
> some cases it's not enough, especially when we don't get a good consensus,
> and then gradually everybody let the things roll
>
> Jacques
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> I don't know much about Moqui, but the biggest motivator I have right now
>> fo
I don't know much about Moqui, but the biggest motivator I have right now for
it is that it would remove control of the framework from this community. I'd
much rather use a framework that has one good architect controlling everything
than use something where poorly thought out code can be dumpe
Why?
Regards
Scott
On 1/05/2011, at 6:43 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While browsing into HTTPClient files I found this bloc just under the ASL2
> license header
>
> * This software consists of voluntary contributions made by many
> * individuals on behalf of the Apache Software Found
I agree with Adrian, the style element alone already gives more that enough
control to theme designers.
Every web developer has (or should have) at least a basic understanding of css
and every time we step away from such a standard (like with additional
attributes in the widgets) we make OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13022030#comment-13022030
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3562:
---
Nevermind, just saw the commit
> Tomahaw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13022028#comment-13022028
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3562:
---
Did you backport the changes to 10.04 Jac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-3562:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> Tomahawk theme makes some webtools entity data unreada
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/security-permission-td154203.html#a154208
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 12/04/2011, at 10:38 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> Hi,
> in the
> https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/EditSecurityGroupPermissionsscreen,
> using the Add Permissi
I'm still not in favor of cobertura being downloaded automatically due to it's
license, even less so if the build actually requires it to be downloaded.
Personally, I won't be voting +1 on any releases until it's removed or someone
verifies with legal that it's okay.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Medi
Why are we even bothering to demo 9.04 if there is a newer version available?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 17/03/2011, at 3:52 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Crhis,
>
> Yes, sounds good to me
>
> Jacques
>
> Christian Geisert wrote:
>> Hi,
>> currently we have 'd
Not sure that would be very feasible since the goal (I thought) was to have
framework level content support available to all applications... Or are you
talking jackrabbit vs. jcr?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 11/03/2011, at 12:55 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On a side
Sorry forgot to say thanks to Arun Patidar for the review and patch.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 4/03/2011, at 12:11 AM, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
> Date: Thu Mar 3 11:11:20 2011
> New Revision: 1076585
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998300#comment-12998300
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4197:
---
It could be an issue with the category tree w
There is an unimplemented tag in ofbiz-component.xsd that I've
been meaning to add support for which would solve this problem. It's not a
trivial implementation though because at the moment components are loaded as
they are located while this feature would require them all to be located first
<http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>
>
> Scott Gray sent the following on 2/17/2011 1:52 AM:
>> But you're typically only using one payment processor per store right? So
>> the
e have this setting at a higher level, however still it
> needs an override at a lower level too.
>
> I am sorry, but this is all I can say and do not have more time to spend
> on this.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 22:52 +1300, Scott Gra
with the payment processor while others do not have this feature.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
> On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 22:11 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Isn't that more of an order related setting rather than anything the payment
>> gateway
Hi Hans,
Isn't that more of an order related setting rather than anything the payment
gateway needs to worry about? Surely we already have processes for this sort
of thing?
Also, we're going to end up with a hell of a mess if we keep putting payment
processor specific code in the order logic.
hanks Scott.
>
> Maybe another option could be that of adding a "condition" attribute to the
> pre-processor element (like path="sub").
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:40 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>
>> I regularly run into a situation where I need a
to the correct set of
> requests in Java. In other words, scoping each preprocessor to a set of
> requests. From what I recall, the preprocessor element overwrites any
> included preprocessor elements.
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 2/15/2011 9:57 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> That c
601 - 700 of 2973 matches
Mail list logo
