http://markmail.org/message/g777vmrachizruef
Sam and Raj made good points too...
Jacques
From: Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com
I think you make a really great point here. JQuery is a utility not a
framework and when it comes to utility it really delivers the goods.
Looking back to Dojo, I
Before or after December 21?
-Adrian
On 6/15/2010 6:52 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
After a 2 second glance it looks interesting enough to bookmark. Based on my
current wish list I should be able to comment further in 2012 :-)
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 16/06/2010,
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
http://markmail.org/message/g777vmrachizruef
Sam and Raj made good points too...
Whoops. Sorry to be redundant. Thanks for the pointer!
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
e...@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
I think you make a really great point here. JQuery is a utility not a
framework and when it comes to utility it really delivers the goods.
Looking back to Dojo, I still believe we need something to counter the
GWT-EXT threat because users continue to demand an application feel
when it comes to
After a 2 second glance it looks interesting enough to bookmark. Based on my
current wish list I should be able to comment further in 2012 :-)
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 16/06/2010, at 1:18 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I think you make a really great point here.
Hey Guys,
From wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaadin
Vaadin utilizes Google Web Toolkit for rendering the resulting web
page. While Google Web Toolkit operates only client-side (i.e. a
browser's JavaScript engine) – which could lead to trust issues – Vaadin
adds server-side validation
Damn, I should have opted for the 3 second glance!
Thanks Sam, good to know.
Regards
Scott
On 16/06/2010, at 2:32 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hey Guys,
From wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaadin
Vaadin utilizes Google Web Toolkit for rendering the resulting web
page. While Google
Vaddin is similar to the Eclipse RAP as both operates on server side
though RAP has a well established API and RAP applications can also work
as Desktop applications (theoretically) without code change and concept
is called single sourcing.
Thanks,
Raj
On 16/06/10 08:02, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Looks like we have a good consensus around Jquery so far.
I must say that the main arugment for Dojo was its serious. It's a real consistent framework with embedded widgets, not only an API.
All those third parties Jquery's widgets (and Prototypes's) are a bit frightening. On the other hand
Good morning guys,
sounds good to me. I will now start implementing a example widget based
onjQuery and provide a patch asap. So erveryone can see how jQuery works.
Have a nice day.
Sascha
2010/6/9 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Looks like we have a good consensus around Jquery
Le 09/06/2010 10:59, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
Good morning guys,
sounds good to me. I will now start implementing a example widget based
onjQuery and provide a patch asap. So erveryone can see how jQuery works.
Have a nice day.
Sascha
2010/6/9 Jacques Le Rouxjacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Hi
Le 09/06/2010 11:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW I opened the dojo1.4 branch but I guess we will drop it and use
rather a jquery branch?
From the different inputs we had on this thread, yes, I think so.. Just
wait for the svn to be repaired !
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
BTW I opened the dojo1.4 branch but I guess we will drop it and use rather a
jquery branch?
Jacques
From: Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr
Le 09/06/2010 10:59, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
Good morning guys,
sounds good to me. I will now start implementing a example widget based
jep another brunch would be great.
Our first steps should not effect the trunk i think;)
Cheers
2010/6/9 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr
Le 09/06/2010 11:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW I opened the dojo1.4 branch but I guess we will drop it and use
rather a jquery
I simply renames dojo1.4 in jquery, it's available
Jacques
From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com
jep another brunch would be great.
Our first steps should not effect the trunk i think;)
Cheers
2010/6/9 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr
Le 09/06/2010
Cool thanks Jacques ... i'will have a look later and provide a first
testing patch.
Cheers
Sascha
2010/6/9 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
I simply renames dojo1.4 in jquery, it's available
Jacques
From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com
jep another
to use. Today, I
have no preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date: Saturday, June
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 7:00 AM
I started using Dojo in Ofbiz long
back and in six months because of issues faced we switched
to using prototype. At that time there were few others in
comunity
because it was pretty easy to use.
Today, I
have no preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Le 08/06/2010 16:12, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
Hey guys,
i started the work to update the Dojo libary to the current version 1.4.
And i have to say that it didn't satisfy me to work on every Dojo based
JaveScript for a little version update. It will coast a lot of time to test
and update all
I'm not a JavaScript expert, so I don't have any strong opinions on the
choice of a library. I have some suggestions, however.
I haven't looked at the JavaScript library integration lately, but I
recall that it started out with creating connector code in
selectall.js. In other words,
My personal opinion is that adding an additional layer of javascript has more
downsides that it does upsides.
- More code to maintain
- Slightly hackish, multi-parameter strings?
- Another API for users to learn
- Abstracting basic method calls is one thing but what about the more complex
object
It would make a number of my developers very happy if we migrated over
to jQuery. Its been described to me that Dojo is heavy and Prototype as
a library for javascript geeks where as jQuery is simpler, more flexible
and faster to use (coding is about 50% quicker than Prototype one
developer has
+1 - I like Prototype, but mostly because we know it well and JQuery was yet
the framework that it is today. You're exactly right that Dojo is heavey and
Prototype is a library for javascript geeks :) JQuery is likely the best
choice on the market right now.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jun 8, 2010,
Comparision article:
http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised
--
Ashish
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tim Ruppert
tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
+1 - I like Prototype, but mostly because we know it well and JQuery was yet
the
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 7:00 AM
I started using Dojo in Ofbiz long
back and in six
because it was pretty easy to use. Today, I
have no preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patelanil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patelanil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patelanil.pa
no preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 7:00 AM
I started
+1
jQuery is simpler, more flexible
and faster to use (coding is about 50% quicker than Prototype one
developer has reported), plus now that its community is really building
the number of plugins and scripts are increasing very fast.
true indeed.
--
Thanks Regards
Atul Vani
Enterprise
Sascha,
We should rather use the dev ML for this thread.
Maybe it's the reason why Anil was reluctant to use Dojo?
Jacques
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
Hey,
so i started upgrading to dojo 1.4.
The good point is ... Dojo 1.4 has many really cool new Features which can
help
Hi Jacques ...
jep it's a lot of work but not impossible :)
A brunch is a good idea to start working on this project. I think the reason
for Antil was, that he isn't use to Dojo. But that shouldn't be a problem
the syntax isn't complicated.
And by the way, if this will work the new Dojo will
I have created a branch
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/dojo1.4
Nothing else for now
Jacques
From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com
Hi Jacques ...
jep it's a lot of work but not impossible :)
A brunch is a good idea to start working on this project. I think
I started using Dojo in Ofbiz long back and in six months because of issues
faced we switched to using prototype. At that time there were few others in
comunity who liked prototype better. But I really don't remember the reasons.
Since then new checkout process was added that uses prototype for
Hi Jacques, cool ...
i implemented the new Tree Widget ... it works fine (and looks nice) :-)
Tomorrow i will prepare some patches for the new brunch.
But for now it's time to prepare the barbecue :-)
So have a nice evening (i hope as sunny as here in germany)
So long Sascha
2010/6/5 Jacques
it was
pretty easy to use. Today, I have no preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date
work - mainly because it was pretty easy to use. Today, I have no
preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa
- mainly because it was pretty easy to use. Today, I have
no preference for either one.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa
Forwarded again :(
This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Forwarding, not sure why
: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
Jacques
- Original Message - From: Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM
wrote:
Forwarded again :(
This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
Jacques
- Original Message - From: Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Forwarding
removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
Jacques
- Original Message - From: Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links
...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
Jacques
- Original Message - From: Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
42 matches
Mail list logo
