Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Thanks Paul, Gil, If it was not a so big move, we could even rename all remove into delete, but forget it ;) Jacques Le 24/08/2017 à 09:08, gil portenseigne a écrit : Hi Paul, You are right, deleteWorkEffortAndRelated will suit perfectly :) Thanks for your feedback Gil On 24/08/2017

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hi Paul, You are right, deleteWorkEffortAndRelated will suit perfectly :) Thanks for your feedback Gil On 24/08/2017 05:38, Paul Foxworthy wrote: Hi Gil, Jacques counted 157 services with names starting with "remove" and 538 starting with "delete" . OFBiz is inconsistent here, but "delete"

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hi Gil, Jacques counted 157 services with names starting with "remove" and 538 starting with "delete" . OFBiz is inconsistent here, but "delete" is more commonly used. Why make it any worse by adding another "remove"? Thanks Paul Foxworthy On 14 August 2017 at 23:50, gil portenseigne

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Thanks Gil, Inline Le 14/08/2017 à 15:50, gil portenseigne a écrit : Hi Jacques, In my opinion when I read deleteWorkEffort i'm expecting an entity-auto service, that will remove my workEffort entry from database. +1 In this case it's removing the workEffort and all related entity, so i

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hi Jacques, In my opinion when I read deleteWorkEffort i'm expecting an entity-auto service, that will remove my workEffort entry from database. In this case it's removing the workEffort and all related entity, so i propose to rename the service to removeWorkEffortAndRelated. This service

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Also for beginners we have this advice in FAQ... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-obsolete Jacques Le 11/08/2017 à 17:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Nicolas, All, Nicolas: are you speaking about

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hi Nicolas, All, Nicolas: are you speaking about deleteProductionRunRoutingTask (OFBIZ-9568), deleteWorkEffort (OFBIZ-9185) or both ? I think you answered only about deleteWorkEffort and then I agree. I was also reluctant to remove it. But then we need to define what would be it's minimal

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hello Jacques, It's a good example why I explained that delete is interesting in some cases. We implemented a process with template workeffort where an operator create a production run from the templating and delete some task that is not needed before start. In this context, I have no

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hello Jacques, Just for easy reference >>Please give your opinion on OFBIZ-9568 before I continue on OFBIZ-9185 Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On

Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hi, Please give your opinion on OFBIZ-9568 before I continue on OFBIZ-9185 Thanks Jacques