Le 22/03/2012 22:26, J. Eckard a écrit :
Do we really want to keep IDE-specific support files in the repository (and
keep them updated by hand in perpetuity)? I ask because it seems like a fragile
(and tedious) process… for instance, I don't use eclipse and I have no idea if
or how this
I put Aptana (better free js Eclipse.plugin editor I found) and explained at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Coding+Conventions
So it's also at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=7766052
So we could get rid of it, yes
Other
It would be interesting to put all configuration file on tools :
* tools/ide/eclipse
* tools/ide/netbeans
and load configuration by ant ?
Nicolas
Le 23/03/2012 07:49, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I put Aptana (better free js Eclipse.plugin editor I found) and
explained at
Keep it simple. Just keep the files for 1 or 2 IDEs and 1 or 2 VCSs and be
done with it.
I do think we should get rid of Aptana.
Regards
Scott
On 23/03/2012, at 8:40 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
It would be interesting to put all configuration file on tools :
* tools/ide/eclipse
*
If those files were not there when I first used OFBiz, I would not
have known how to set up Eclipse. I agree with Scott - let the Eclipse
users worry about them.
-Adrian
Quoting Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com:
The flip side of the argument would be that everyone who is using
Do we really want to keep IDE-specific support files in the repository (and
keep them updated by hand in perpetuity)? I ask because it seems like a fragile
(and tedious) process… for instance, I don't use eclipse and I have no idea if
or how this change will affect an existing eclipse project.
The flip side of the argument would be that everyone who is using eclipse would
then have to maintain it themselves, not sure that would be more efficient for
the community.
Personally I don't really mind cleaning it up myself when I see an error, takes
a few minutes at most. And I think
This needs some thoughts, but it's too late for me, my brain can't cope, ok
trying, nothing guaranteed...
As we are trying to slim down OFBiz, my 1st answer would be yes
On the other hand I appreciate to not have to build anew .classpath each time I
work on a new project
Could not the same
+1, this is also the conclusion I came out (with a slow brain)
Jacques
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
The flip side of the argument would be that everyone who is using eclipse would
then have to maintain it themselves, not sure that
would be more efficient for the community.
I have mixed feelings about this:
1) it is not nice to see the IDE specific files in the OFBiz home: .project,
.classpath (for Eclipse) and ofbiz.aptana.js.format.xml (for Aptana)
** off topic question: why do we have the .hgignore file? (ignore file for
Mercurial?)
2) in the same time the
10 matches
Mail list logo
