[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4418.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Dimitri.
Your Patch is in Trunk
Sure I am all in favor to use the existing datamodel, this means however
that every communication event will have a workeffort connected to it
because somebody has to handle it? sounds a it bureaucratic?,
then as a result of the creation of the opportunity more emails are sent
from the
Not necessarily every communication event, but if it requires action then a
WorkEffort seems like the logic choice to track the work done.
If you were to send more emails in connection with the opportunity then they
would be linked to the existing WorkEffort.
Ask yourself this, why is there a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4414.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch 11.04
Just curious - how is a SalesOpportunity different from a Request (or
CustRequest in OFBiz)? What does SalesOpportunity model?
-Adrian
On 9/15/2011 7:19 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Not necessarily every communication event, but if it requires action then a
WorkEffort seems like the logic choice to
getOrderStatus service is defined with export=true
Key: OFBIZ-4419
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4419
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dimitri Unruh updated OFBIZ-4419:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4419.patch
getOrderStatus service is defined with export=true
Scott, Sascha,
thank you for your opinion...
I did create a new issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4419
) to close it.
Viele Grüße
Best Regards
Dimitri Unruh
Consultant AEW
Lynx-Consulting GmbH
Johanniskirchplatz 6
33615 Bielefeld
Deutschland
Fon: +49 521 5247-0
Fax: +49 521
I do not agree, i want to list all commevents on an opportunity which
gets now too difficul
Hans
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:19 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
Not necessarily every communication event, but if it requires action then a
WorkEffort seems like the logic choice to track the work done.
It really doesn't seem very difficult to me and coupling SalesOpportunity and
WorkEffort will give you much more flexibility in the future.
Regards
Scott
On 15/09/2011, at 7:00 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I do not agree, i want to list all commevents on an opportunity which
gets now too difficul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4417:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
blockingTestScv Service is set to export=true
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4419:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
getOrderStatus service is defined with export=true
then we have to agree to disagree?
Ok my last question, you are going to block this?'
cannot spend too much time on this...
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 19:08 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
It really doesn't seem very difficult to me and coupling SalesOpportunity and
WorkEffort will give
Ask for comments and then ignore them, well done Hans. If you don't have time
to wait for opinions and have proper discussions then keep your changes local
until you do.
Regards
Scott
On 15/09/2011, at 7:33 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
then we have to agree to disagree?
Ok my last question,
Ok sounds fair, let wait for other comments.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 19:37 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
Ask for comments and then ignore them, well done Hans. If you don't have
time to wait for opinions and have proper discussions then keep your changes
local until you do.
Regards
Scott
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105193#comment-13105193
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4274:
A clear distinction needs to be made between HTTP
even if it is done automatically, all efforts cost time which is what
workeffort is about. This feed back to budgets.
and since this system is about business, tracking cost is very important.
on a coding level I think the Model for SFA is sprawl and could have
been developed with in the frame
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4419.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Dimitri. Your Patch is in Trunk
So, if there are so much different opinions and personal preferences, why
not creating an eclipse code formatter?
We could add it to the project, so that there will be no more discussions
about things like that :) (I think it is important, that every developer
in a project is following some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4417.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Dimitri, your patch is in Trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4399.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Assignee: Adrian Crum
I agree with Adrian, putIfAbsent would
Yes that's what I was suggesting. See my previous message about that (look for Eclipse Java/Code Style/Formatter template based on
default (Java Conventions [built-in]) )
But you need to agree before on what to put in the formatter...
Jacques
Dimitri Unruh wrote:
So, if there are so much
Sorry Jacques,
I missed your last message... :)
Viele Grüße
Best Regards
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: 15.09.2011 13:03
Subject:Re: svn commit: r1170442 -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Attachment: RestXmlRepresentation.pdf
RestXmlRepresentation.pdf is the proposed XML representation.
IO stream objects are not closed
Key: OFBIZ-4420
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4420
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Reporter: Dimitri Unruh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dimitri Unruh updated OFBIZ-4420:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4420.patch
IO stream objects are not closed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4420:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
IO stream objects are not closed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105376#comment-13105376
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-4420:
Jap that looks good, but we should keep
Someone I work with suggested:
I have to point out though that I kind of agree with the way David put it in that the false setting could have a priority, i.e.
it's like in security permissions where deny has precedence over allow, so if you set it in widget.properties to false then you're
sure
Impossible ClassCast
Key: OFBIZ-4421
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4421
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: product
Reporter: Dimitri Unruh
Attachments:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dimitri Unruh updated OFBIZ-4421:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4421.patch
Impossible ClassCast
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dimitri Unruh updated OFBIZ-4422:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4422.patch
Using equals() with different object types
Using equals() with different object types
--
Key: OFBIZ-4422
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4422
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4421:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
Impossible ClassCast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4422:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
Using equals() with different object types
I am going to feel bad if I don't add my 2 cents to this thread :-)
I agree with Jacques that the formatting of boundary comments should be output
specific (i.e no output for CSV etc...) instead of always rendering as html
comments.
As regards the logic to determine if comments should be enabled
Some time ago there was a discussion about coding pattern if not true it
is false.
it was WidgetVerbose which says it had to be true to be verbose.
I don't see changing widget.properties. to enableBoundaryComments
it means those that have production have to become familiar with new.
this goes
very trivial update to filedlookup.js: encodeURI before construct a new href
value for nav-buttons in layered lookup dialog.
Key: OFBIZ-4423
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leon updated OFBIZ-4423:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4423-fieldlookup.patch
very trivial update to filedlookup.js: encodeURI before construct a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4423:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
very trivial update to filedlookup.js: encodeURI before
Background:
Thur. Sept 15, 2011 3:30pm ET downloaded latest trunk zip file. Ran ant
run-install. Ran ./startofbiz.sh. Navigate my browser to:
http://localhost:8080/ecommerce/control/MainBlog?blogContentId=BLOGROOTMADMAX
Click on:
http://localhost:8080/2008-Elections-BLG10007-content
Empty
We will have a look at this Ruth, it is specific from the blog though,
look at the policies at the bottom of the screen, there it works,
Regards,
Hans
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Alternative ofbiz website: http://www.ofbiz.info
http://www.antwebsystems.com : Quality
I wonder if this business case is analogous to Marketing Tasks on
page 293 of Volume 2 of the Data Model book?
Cheers,
Anne.
On 15 September 2011 18:12, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com wrote:
Ok sounds fair, let wait for other comments.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 19:37 +1200, Scott Gray
Hi Hans,
If you're working in the ItemIssuance area, you might want to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4386 . I reckon there's a nasty
bug there, and the Jira issue has a unit test to demonstrate it and a patch.
Since your change is for service products, I doubt there's any
I see Jacques is working on your issue. The changes we made are for the
specific product type only, so i do not expect a conflict here.
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 19:24 -0700, Paul Foxworthy wrote:
Hi Hans,
If you're working in the ItemIssuance area, you might want to look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4423.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Leon your patch is in Trunk @Rev.1171391
very trivial update to
46 matches
Mail list logo
