Hi Mansour,
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Jacques,
We use RTL.
May be you are right about the the ease of use to find an item, but
the user who has permission to all these functionality is an admin,
and normally, she is comfortable finding any item quickly. The rest of
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4735.
--
User behaviour issue on Lookup.
---
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-1745.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-4366.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-3769.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-2486.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
I am doing some cleanup in Jira versions and I would like to archive the
Screen Widget Redesign version: there are currently 3 tasks there (all
resolved); this change will not affect them (the only effect will be that the
version will disappers from the valid values in the drop down when you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus M. May updated OFBIZ-4738:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-refactor_category_worker.patch
Minor Refactoring in CategoryWorker - use
Hi Jacopo,
I have few questions on the proposed idea for Extras.
-- Since the projects will be hosted as Apache OFBiz Extras and not officially
under ASF, In future does this means these projects should strictly follow the
ASF license? What if user group and/or the code maintainer of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1745.
--
gift card processer error
-
Key: OFBIZ-1745
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2486.
--
Next button/link on Physical Inventory Screen does not work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3769.
--
Entry of invoice in Trail balance after receiving PO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4366.
--
Accessing Ofbiz Entity UtilCache is time consuming
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4734.
--
User behaviour issue on auto-completer.
---
Hi Vikas,
I am sharing my ideas about this new process (they are also based on my reading
of various documents provided by ASF):
On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I have few questions on the proposed idea for Extras.
-- Since the projects will be hosted as
Thanks Jacopo for your quick response. It clears my doubt.
Regards
Vikas
On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Vikas,
I am sharing my ideas about this new process (they are also based on my
reading of various documents provided by ASF):
On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:58 AM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tri Duc Vo updated OFBIZ-4627:
--
Attachment: ProductUiLabels.xml.patch
ProductEntityLabels.xml.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234215#comment-13234215
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4627:
Hi Tri,
Those files looks good. I
Hey Thanks for the reply Arun,
Can you please help with a pivot to work-out which type of rate it is
(list/discounted)?
Also about dimensions, as the SOAP API is being used , I'd to use custom code
to check
Dimensions of RequestedPackage from the RateRequest and I got an NPE on
Hey Scott,
Thanks for your reply, Does that means its the problem with API for
the differences in the rates that I'm seeing?
Regards
Prince
From: Scott. sc...@anglolimited.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:49 PM
Subject: Re:
Where are we going to show the list of addons for OFBiz? Will this only be
limited to ones in Apache Extra's or for the people who prefer to do their
source hosting on say github join in too?
Thanks
Sam
On 21 Mar 2012, at 16:23, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Thanks Jacopo for your quick response. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tri Duc Vo updated OFBIZ-4627:
--
Attachment: ProductUiLabels.xml.patch
ProductEntityLabels.xml.patch
Hey Jacques,
Thanks for your response, I read that already, Its kinda goin that way with
Almost everything
these days , Firstly Amazon and now Fedex and may be other ones to come soon.
Actually rather than buying those, we(The community) should also think of
upgrading the existing solutions.
We will setup a page in the OFBiz website, for sure.
The final decision on the projects that will appear there will be done by the
OFBiz PMC but I guess that initially it will only contain projects in Apache
Extras; there may be exceptions to to this rule, I guess.
Jacopo
On Mar 21, 2012, at
Well I don't know why is it suggested so as in the mail by Paul,
But as I already mentioned :
- Forwarded Message -
From: Prince Sewani princesew...@ymail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: loop code simplification
I prefer to keep the Flat Grey and one other.
Op 20 maart 2012 12:48 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
I) $OFBIZ_HOME/themes/*: move a few of them to Attic and a few of them
to Extras; keep just one (or two)
Jacques proposed to keep Tomahawk
+1 on removal from core (framework), as it doesn't add any value in a
framework. However, having it available as a separate downloadable
application (to be used from hot-deploy or special purpose) would be
beneficiary for newcomers in the development scene.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 20 maart 2012
Well the 'bin' clashing with eclipse default is really a concern
to being with, the learning curve is yet steep, and with to dos of IDE's as of
now,
everyone is pretty much acquainted. Also in-case we change it to 'bin' in the
main folder,
then there'll be an additional set of documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tri Duc Vo updated OFBIZ-4627:
--
Attachment: ProductUiLabels.xml.patch
ProductEntityLabels.xml.patch
+1
Op 21 maart 2012 08:03 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
I am doing some cleanup in Jira versions and I would like to archive the
Screen Widget Redesign version: there are currently 3 tasks there (all
resolved); this change will not affect them (the
+1
Op 20 maart 2012 12:48 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to Attic
Jacques and Olivier proposed to move it to Extras instead just in case
someone will pick up the work and complete it in the future.
I would
Re 1: keep in framework +1
Re 2: remove from upcoming release 12.04 +1, remove from all upcoming
future releases until 3 is finished
Re 3: draft up requirements for content framework replacement +1
Excellent roadmapping ;-)
Regards,
Pierre
Op 20 maart 2012 11:48 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
then this could be in contrast with the ASF infrastructure offered
to the projects. -
??? try: http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ofbiz/
Regards,
Hans
On 03/20/2012 06:48 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to Attic
Jacques and Olivier proposed to
A) removal of framework/guiapp out of framework: +1
B) move specialpurpose/pos to 'Extras' +1
I am not in favour of moving ProjectMgr out of specialpurpose to 'Extras'
as the majority of my customers use this. However, if it goes to 'Extras' I
would like to assist in maintaining it.
Regards,
On all: +1
Regards,
Pierre
Op 20 maart 2012 12:48 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
C) $OFBIZ_HOME/debian: move to Attic
D) the seleniumxml code in framework/testtools: move to Attic
E) specialpurpose/workflow: move to Attic
F)
+ 1 on move of majority of apps in specialpurpose to 'Extras', excluding
projectmgr as it displays how to use OFBiz in a different industry than
ecommerce/webshop. Is it not so that OFBiz is versatile. ProjectMgr does
deliver some of that versatility.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 20 maart 2012 12:47
+1. This is an example of bloat. Keeping ill-maintained static documents in
OFBiz (the suite) that are also available through the OFBiz website is not
adding value.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 20 maart 2012 12:48 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
O)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234277#comment-13234277
]
Paul Foxworthy commented on OFBIZ-4627:
---
Hello Tri,
Thank you very much for your
The idea behind this that documents in wiki are not according the
version..(only the latest)
This directory has it for the related version AND can be in different
languages and formats: html, pdf
do judge before you understand..
Regards,
Hans
On 03/21/2012 06:01 PM, Pierre Smits
Currently, rptdesign is used in specialpurpose applications like ebaystore
and scrum, but also in core applications (accounting, order and product).
We have to provide reports in our applications, as it would be difficult to
maintain the concept of completeness of functionality without them.
Infra wouldn't be happy if we host the website in that demo instance; websites
potentially have a lot of visits and that server is not intended for the load;
this is similar to Confluence based pages: we will no more be allowed to use
direct links to them from the website.
Jacopo
On Mar 21,
Jacques,
inline:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Hi Mansour,
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Jacques,
We use RTL.
May be you are right about the the ease of use to find an item, but
the user who has permission to
I would recommend keeping partymgr and assetmaint.
I am not sure if accounting depends on assetmain.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
+ 1 on move of majority of apps in specialpurpose to 'Extras', excluding
projectmgr as it displays how to use OFBiz
(I also copied the user list because users are heavily impacted here.
Users please read the development forum at http://www.ofbiz.info)
Hi Everybody interested in the future of ofbiz,
-
*i am very concerned with the current route which
List rate means direct rates based on weight and dimensions of items and
Account rates which based on discount provided on account. You can verify it
from value of filed 'RateRequestTypes' in your rate request.
You need some customization around it to get dimensions of package and
products.
Hans,
The problem is that it's completly outdated and nobody is able/want to maintain
it
Just compare with http://ofbiz.apache.org/ which follows ASF rules with for
instance a TM on Logo, etc.
Jacques
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
then this could be in contrast with
Prince, It’s my understanding that FedEx is/has retired the Ship Manager API
and the Ship Manager Direct solutions that are integrated into OFBiz and
will require anyone using them to migrate to FedEx Web Services. I think
that was what Jacques was trying to say originally. If you are making
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Jacques,
inline:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Hi Mansour,
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Jacques,
We use RTL.
May be you are right about the the ease of use to find
partymgr is in application will not move, you meant ProjectMgr right?
Jacques
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
I would recommend keeping partymgr and assetmaint.
I am not sure if accounting depends on assetmain.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Pierre Smits
Jacques,
sure at the time is was up-to-date and this was a proposal how we can
use ofbiz for the website, however because of the strict apache rules it
was not used...but can still be a template for any local ofbiz website.
It remains weak: being an 'ofbiz' provider but not using it
And there are parts in framework
Jacques
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
The idea behind this that documents in wiki are not according the
version..(only the latest)
This directory has it for the related version AND can be in different
languages and formats: html, pdf
do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234366#comment-13234366
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4627:
Thanks Paul,
Much appreciated :) !
Hans,
The OFBiz project can hardly be regarded as an OFBiz Provider. Look at the
list of Providers on the site. Then look at the source of their websites
and have a feel for how many (besides your company) use OFBiz as a WCM.
There are several solutions in the field providing for website
Please no longer use dev ML for that and refer to this thread rather
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/new-FedEx-Web-Services-Integration-Module-for-OFBiz-tt4487002.html
Jacques
--
View this message in context:
Hey Scott,
I truly agree to what you said and I understood pretty well what Jacques was
pointing to and I appreciate it, that's a wise advice.
They're yet to retire the API, not much time though, What I'm wondering about
is the
cause that's creating the difference in rates when you're
As of now, anyone can disable components, and enable them as an extra
commercial plugins. An if they are downloaded separately, it doesn't
add to their commercial value. I am not sure if I missing something
here.
For example, at this point, anyone can disable Birt component, and say
Hey, I can
Hey Arun,
Thanks for your wonderful reply that captures all the customization stuff
needed and
also matches my plan that I had in mah mind go ahead with.
It'll certainly need customizations to match-up with the ideal implementation,
But all that made me post was the cause due which despite
Hi Jacques,
Surely, I got the pivots I was looking for.
Thanks a lot for your guidance. :)
Regards
Prince
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Default package size
Jacques,
Yes. You are right. I meant projectmgr. :)
I believe assetmaint and projectmgr are used more than others and good
to keep them where they are.
Thank you.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
partymgr is in application will not move,
They are more generic sure, I wonder for the pos...
Jacques
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Jacques,
Yes. You are right. I meant projectmgr. :)
I believe assetmaint and projectmgr are used more than others and good
to keep them where they are.
Thank you.
On Wed, Mar 21,
Description: Goals of this enhancement are :
- simplification of portlet development by use of portlet Templates
(PortletType), so most of the time, it's sufficient to define a form to have a
portlet
- default value of formName, menuName, ScreenName, ScriptName, Title, ... (name
and location)
Portlet Widget
--
Key: OFBIZ-4742
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4742
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Olivier Heintz
People are really worried on the idea of moving certain components from Ofbiz
trunk to Ofbiz Extras. Why is it so?
Moving a component from Ofbiz trunk to Ofbiz Extras does not mean that the
component is not good and so we are throwing it out. Instead idea is to allow
components to grow by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234389#comment-13234389
]
Olivier Heintz commented on OFBIZ-4742:
---
Technical choices :
- add some fields in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Heintz updated OFBIZ-4742:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-4742.patch
first release :
I leave the addon comment, because :
- it's
Anil,
I agree with you.
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits specialpurpose.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
People are really
icon-purpose : same concept as uiLabel but for icons, a property file to
address icons by a logical name
-
Key: OFBIZ-4743
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Heintz updated OFBIZ-4743:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-4743.patch
icon-purpose : same concept as uiLabel but for icons, a
ProductStoreCartAwareEvents: wrong check for website in setSessionProductStore
--
Key: OFBIZ-4744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4744
Project: OFBiz
portlet-example : example portalPage with portlet using new functionality
(portletType and showPortlet)
---
Key: OFBIZ-4745
URL:
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits specialpurpose.
Why do you think a component will be used more if its in specialpurpose
section, instead of Extras.
Personally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-4744:
-
Attachment:
OFBIZ-4744_ProductStoreCartAwareEvents_wrong_check_for_website.patch
The patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Heintz updated OFBIZ-4745:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-4745.patch
to be usable, it's necessary to have installed Jira-4688,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Heintz updated OFBIZ-4746:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-4746.patch
portlet-help : help file on development using portlet
portlet-help : help file on development using portlet
-
Key: OFBIZ-4746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4746
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Heintz updated OFBIZ-4742:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-portletWidget_iconsPurpose_Example_Help.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234427#comment-13234427
]
Olivier Heintz commented on OFBIZ-4745:
---
I have use example and example help, to
Anil,
I did not mean that putting a component under specialpurposes will
make it used more by developers.
I meant because it will be used more than other component, let's not move it.
From Jacopo's first email about the Lose Weight :
Legenda for what I propose for each piece of code:
* Attic:
I do not see any issues if the existing projects that are slated to be moved to
Extras adhere to the ASF 2.0 license but as I see it further I don't see any
issues either if the license of any project is changed in future. I think it
would be good for the project overall and while its not
+1
Le 21/03/2012 11:38, Pierre Smits a écrit :
+1
Op 21 maart 2012 08:03 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
I am doing some cleanup in Jira versions and I would like to archive the
Screen Widget Redesign version: there are currently 3 tasks there (all
Le 21/03/2012 11:45, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Re 1: keep in framework +1
Re 2: remove from upcoming release 12.04 +1, remove from all upcoming
future releases until 3 is finished
plugin could really be the solution, because most of contribution coming
from customer project, and it's easier for a
Le 20/03/2012 10:15, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Thanks to all of you for the great discussion and feedback: I really appreciate
all the time and great ideas you have shared.
There seems to be a general agreement (with exceptions) about the following
points:
* the size of OFBiz should be
Le 20/03/2012 15:31, adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com a écrit :
I like the idea of keeping reporting tools separate from OFBiz. In my
experience, IT departments are already using a reporting tool for
other applications and they would prefer to integrate that tool with
OFBiz, instead of
+1 birt to extra
and there will also a jasperReport in extras
Le 20/03/2012 15:34, Mansour Al Akeel a écrit :
+1 birt to Extra.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM,adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
I like the idea of keeping reporting tools separate from OFBiz. In my
experience, IT
Le 20/03/2012 15:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
A) move framework/guiapp out of the framework; after all these years
no code made advantage of it being part of the framework and it is
only used by the specialpurpose/pos component (which
Le 21/03/2012 11:50, Pierre Smits a écrit :
A) removal of framework/guiapp out of framework: +1
B) move specialpurpose/pos to 'Extras' +1
I am not in favour of moving ProjectMgr out of specialpurpose to 'Extras' as
the majority of my customers use this. However, if it goes to 'Extras' I would
Hi Olivier,
I would love to exchange thoughts regarding migration to portlets.
Regards,
Pierre
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 mrt. 2012, at 17:26, Olivier Heintz holivier.lis...@nereide.biz wrote:
Le 21/03/2012 11:50, Pierre Smits a écrit :
A) removal of framework/guiapp out of framework: +1
On Mar 21, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
+1 for ProjectMgr as a Apache-OFBiz plug-in, not out of Apache-OFBiz
ps: most of our(the company I'm working for) future contribution will be
complete Projectmgr migration to portlet ;-)
Just to avoid any confusion:
* with this +1 you are
As a next step, after all these threads about the slim down will settle down,
we should probably, as a community, start to prepare the plan of action, aka
roadmap (we could use Jira for it): add there all the actionable tasks coming
out of this discussions; then, in these mailing lists we
Le 21/03/2012 16:16, Anil Patel a écrit :
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits specialpurpose.
Why do you think a component will be used more if its in specialpurpose
Le 21/03/2012 17:40, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Mar 21, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
+1 for ProjectMgr as a Apache-OFBiz plug-in, not out of Apache-OFBiz
ps: most of our(the company I'm working for) future contribution will be
complete Projectmgr migration to portlet ;-)
Just
discussion on OFBiz Plugin Management, status and propositions should
be on the corresponding thread
Le 20/03/2012 16:59, Mansour Al Akeel a écrit :
Ant+Ivy would fit easier with the structure of ofbiz components.
If we want to move to maven, then a modification to
Le 20/03/2012 23:44, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Everyone has different preference about how would the basic component
skeleton looks like (ie, with ajax, without, exta functionality
).
Even if a basic example included with ofbiz distribution,
Le 21/03/2012 15:03, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Jacques,
sure at the time is was up-to-date and this was a proposal how we can
use ofbiz for the website, however because of the strict apache rules
it was not used...but can still be a template for any local ofbiz
website.
It remains weak:
From: Olivier Heintz holivier.lis...@nereide.biz
Le 20/03/2012 15:31, adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com a écrit :
I like the idea of keeping reporting tools separate from OFBiz. In my experience, IT departments are already using a reporting
tool for other applications and they would prefer to
From: Olivier Heintz holivier.lis...@nereide.biz
Le 21/03/2012 11:45, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Re 1: keep in framework +1
Re 2: remove from upcoming release 12.04 +1, remove from all upcoming
future releases until 3 is finished
plugin could really be the solution, because most of contribution
From: Olivier Heintz holivier.lis...@nereide.biz
Le 20/03/2012 15:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
A) move framework/guiapp out of the framework; after all these years no code
made advantage of it being part of the framework
and it is
Hi Anil,
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits specialpurpose.
Why do you think a component will be used more if its in
From: Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com
Anil,
I did not mean that putting a component under specialpurposes will
make it used more by developers.
I meant because it will be used more than other component, let's not move it.
From Jacopo's first email about the Lose Weight :
Legenda for
Le 21/03/2012 14:00, Hans Bakker a écrit :
(I also copied the user list because users are heavily impacted here.
Users please read the development forum at http://www.ofbiz.info)
Hi Everybody interested in the future of ofbiz,
-
*i am
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
