Hi all,
I think it is the right time to create a new release branch out of the
trunk.
According to our naming conventions the release will be named
"release16.09".
Any objections or concerns? If not, I will create the branch later
today/tomorrow.
After that we will start, in a separate thread,
+1
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> That's great news ! +1
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
> On 07/09/16 12:06, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think it is the right time to create a new release branch out of the
>> trunk.
>>
>> According to our
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 7:57 AM, jler...@apache.org
> wrote:
>
>> ...
>> IMO we can delete the cmssite component jars they are only used in
>> extensions of Dockbook and AFAIK
Yes I see no problems with that. I just need to add directions for users
before. I'll then remove the jars... very soon...
Jacques
Le 07/09/2016 à 13:09, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Jacques, any news from notsoserial?
If not, I think we can proceed by (temporarily) removing the jars until
Jacques, any news from notsoserial?
If not, I think we can proceed by (temporarily) removing the jars until
they will publish the jar.
Regards,
Jacopo
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Yes that's what I proposed also, I will try that
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> ...
>
2. So I created a private static final String: private static final String
> getResourceRegex = "ServiceUtil\\.getResource\\(\\)"
>But this did not work. I got
>
>2016-09-07 08:27:32,489
OK no problems with me, I'll change that. I must say I did no like the property
either.
Jacques
Le 07/09/2016 à 09:56, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
...
2. So I created a private static final String:
BTW, when we initially spoke about "that" with Michael (before this thread while working on the monthly blog post) I thought that an easier way to
generate the detailed Jira issues notes would be to use Jira itself.
Unfortunately if this works well for releases, you can't filter dates on the
That's great news ! +1
Thanks
Sharan
On 07/09/16 12:06, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I think it is the right time to create a new release branch out of the
trunk.
According to our naming conventions the release will be named
"release16.09".
Any objections or concerns? If not, I will
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Le 20/08/2016 à 08:28, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 7:57 AM, jler...@apache.org
>> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>> ebaystore component we need to put in Attic?
>>>
>>>
I think we can proceed in the following way:
1) remove the jar and the dependent Gradle code and move on with the
release branches and release publication workflow
2) continue the discussion about what, where, how we want to document about
nososerial (e.g. a message in our download page would be
Hi Jacques,
First of all the ofbizSecure task is gone instead everything calls the
correct jvm arguments by default to fetch notsoserial.
The work to remove notsoserial is almost nothing. You just to remove a few
jvm args and that's it. Even if you don't remove the jvm args nothing
happens
Thank you Jacques and Taher.
So it seems we can move on and temporarily remove the jar.
Jacopo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
> Hi Jacques,
>
> First of all the ofbizSecure task is gone instead everything calls the
> correct jvm arguments
Huho, I was too fast on this. Currently the Gradle "ofbizSecure" tasks depends
on the notsoserial-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
So this would need more work and w/o answers from them I suspect they will not
publish the jar.
Now it's a serious security but not OOTB. So I see 2 possibilities.
1. Ask the
OK, since we have no issues OOTB that can be done.
But IMO documenting the whole thing in our nososerial readme.txt is not enough.
We need to make that more prominent. Not sure how yet...
Jacques
Le 07/09/2016 à 20:09, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Scratch that, actually only the -D arguments
+1 Jacopo!
Thanks,
Michael
Am 07.09.16 um 12:06 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
Hi all,
I think it is the right time to create a new release branch out of the
trunk.
According to our naming conventions the release will be named
"release16.09".
Any objections or concerns? If not, I will create
Thanks!
We still use last_price in supplier_product as default price. The new
entities only using for special cases and we need setting up some trigger
before order to save time. About screens, i'll take options for end user
choosing, inside price will be calculate automatic and not change logical
Hi Jacopo ,
I think using Agreement is ok with my case. But in small business, the
agreement sometime not enough flexibility, transaction between the seller
and the buyer only base on invoice and payment. The agreements only
contains some rules basically. I will try. Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016
Scratch that, actually only the -D arguments are ignored, we must remove
the -javaagent argument because it's not a classpath argument and would
crash the VM
But for consistency's sake, let's remove them all for now. So simply we
apply:
Index: build.gradle
OK Cool, if the JVM arguments are simply ignored, then I will proceed with an
addition in the readme and remove the jar, simple
Jacques
Le 07/09/2016 à 17:16, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Thank you Jacques and Taher.
So it seems we can move on and temporarily remove the jar.
Jacopo
On
I decided using minimumOrderQuantity to check and apply price for
order_item. Thanks all!
Cheers!
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM, thang nguyen
wrote:
> Hi Jacopo ,
> I think using Agreement is ok with my case. But in small business, the
> agreement sometime not
Le 06/09/2016 à 19:03, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:38 PM, wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Tue Sep 6 16:38:14 2016
New Revision: 1759457
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1759457=rev
Log:
...
* Moreover the string can't be in the
22 matches
Mail list logo