[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971570#action_12971570
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4059:
--
They are working for me. Can you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971576#action_12971576
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4059:
Hi Jacopo,
Yes it's because I just update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4059.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Paul,
It's fixed. I finally gave up
Why is this needed for this particular form?
Isn't this automatically managed by the from widget?
-Bruno
2010/12/15 hans...@apache.org
Author: hansbak
Date: Wed Dec 15 08:15:49 2010
New Revision: 1049451
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049451view=rev
Log:
preserve viewindex and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4043:
---
Attachment: screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg
Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo
As far as i can see it is currently not
if you are on page 2 and press a update/delete button, the system will
show page one again
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:51 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote:
Why is this needed for this particular form?
Isn't this automatically managed by the
OK, now I better see what you mean.
Thank you,
Bruno
2010/12/15 Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
As far as i can see it is currently not
if you are on page 2 and press a update/delete button, the system will
show page one again
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:51
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-4057:
--
Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES
Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with
I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in
applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a
framework-only demo installation. Is that intentional? If yes, how does
one log into a framework-only demo installation?
-Adrian
Oops, I meant the admin user login demo data is loaded in
applications/securityext.
On 12/15/2010 8:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in
applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a
framework-only demo installation. Is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971725#action_12971725
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4057:
---
Hi Chirag,
could you include your
I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm
trying to get a framework-only installation to run.
There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components.
Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The
online help system uses the
I agree that if you successfully load demo data (ant run-install) in a
framework only setup, the demo admin user should be there as well.
Jacopo
On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Oops, I meant the admin user login demo data is loaded in
applications/securityext.
On
Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found
-
Key: OFBIZ-4060
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects
first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level.
Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed.
when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user.
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
On Dec 15, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying
to get a framework-only installation to run.
There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing
dependencies on the party component should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4060:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: OFBIZ-3814
Bug In Jquery Integration - js
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971770#action_12971770
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4060:
It should be normally handled by this
To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to
run by themselves - without the components found in the applications
folder. Some of the framework components have UIs.
I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a
framework, so I don't want to
I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own
frame work as I did.
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com
I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply
moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of
dependencies to deal with.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
To clarify, I'm
At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework
are the content entities and their CRUD services.
-Adrian
On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply
moving it to the framework would probably
I'm guessing you'd also need ContentWorker and DataResourceWorker.
Regards
Scott
On 16/12/2010, at 8:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are
the content entities and their CRUD services.
-Adrian
On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott
I agree. It possible to split content to framework component and keep
functionnal on application but I think this operation It's not easy and
I haven't suggest how do this.
Nicolas
Le 15/12/2010 20:15, Adrian Crum a écrit :
At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971842#action_12971842
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4043:
---
Jacques,
I just upgraded the Derby
the pattern of having the entities and services specific to a component
will be broken. so a test file in each folder about were the entities
and services are should be included.
you can take the webapp/content/docbooks and put in common since it is
standalone engine for created docbooks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971849#action_12971849
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4043:
---
since the local host work on my machine and the
I agree this is the way to go. Certain parts of certain application components
should have been in the framework from the beginning, but certainly not all of
them. Splitting out those specific parts and putting them in framework
components as needed is the way to go.
-David
On Dec 15, 2010,
Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally)
independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only
question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general
approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application
Hi,
Can I check I understand what's going on in lines 394 and onward in the
getTaxAdjustments method in TaxAuthorityServices.java?
You can choose a price based on any criteria, and that price is passed in
the itemPrice parameter to the getTaxAdjustments method. This method looks
at the default
That's pretty much correct. A product can certainly have some prices with tax
included and some without.
Keep in mind though that there are possible configurations that will result in
invalid (or undesired) numbers coming out the other end, such as a price in a
certain currency without tax
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971990#action_12971990
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4043:
Thanks Erwan,
You upgraded only the trunk
32 matches
Mail list logo
