[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4275.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hi Erwan,
sorry for the delay. I submitted the new functionality @rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4256.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
The Patch is in Rev: 1102615
Have a good
parse javascript link wrongly in lookup layer dialog if there's slash '/' in
data
-
Key: OFBIZ-4281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leon updated OFBIZ-4281:
Attachment: fieldlookup.js.patch
parse javascript link wrongly in lookup layer dialog if there's slash '/' in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4281:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
parse javascript link wrongly in lookup layer dialog if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13032942#comment-13032942
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-4281:
Hey Leon can you give me an example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13032976#comment-13032976
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4278:
---
I don't see a reason why it doesn't and the commit
Hi all,
I'm planning on changing the ports for the http and https test
containers. This way, tests can be runned on the Apache jenkins instance
(8080 is already used).
Is there anyone against these ?
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
+1, I can't see any issues changing default OOTB
Jacques
From: Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.biz
Hi all,
I'm planning on changing the ports for the http and https test
containers. This way, tests can be runned on the Apache jenkins instance
(8080 is already used).
Is there
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request
Role Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name
difference, the only other difference is using Role Type instead of
Request Role Type. Reusing Role Type in this way is okay from my
perspective. The
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role
Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name difference, the
only other difference is using Role Type instead of Request Role Type.
Reusing Role
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role
Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name difference, the
only other difference is using Role Type
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request
Role Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role
Type entity in The Data Model
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation
As long as it is just for the test-containers.xml file.
I would be against changing this for the ofbiz-containers.xml file, too many
people are used to it and too much documentation points to it, so changing it
there would require a significant effort to change docs and communicate the
On 5/13/2011 2:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The
On May 13, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 2:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13033421#comment-13033421
]
Leon commented on OFBIZ-4281:
-
hi, Sascha,
here is an example:
in form widget, we defined a
On 5/13/2011 2:33 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 2:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011
20 matches
Mail list logo
