[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4798.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch 11.04
Jacques,
what a mess... I think we need to be more accurate here.
The tests are failing since your commit 1311214 with the new test port numbers;
I didn't follow the details and so I don't know exactly your reasoning behind
this change and most of all why it was urgent.
However, the changes
Actually, I am reviewing the changes I did and I may be able to commit them and
fix the tests.
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Jacques,
what a mess... I think we need to be more accurate here.
The tests are failing since your commit 1311214 with the new test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251404#comment-13251404
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-4783:
-
We should ask ourselves why we do want the java
I have committed my changes in rev. 1324614.
Now the tests should all pass.
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Actually, I am reviewing the changes I did and I may be able to commit them
and fix the tests.
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacques, all,
First of all: you are right. If there weren't a need for solution you
wouldn't go that way.
But as it happens, within the consortium of the project there are partners
who have implemented ESB's (and for the sake of the argument let's pretend
that in the European market space
Thanks, I have asked infra about Buildbot again this morning, begins to be
long...
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
I have committed my changes in rev. 1324614.
Now the tests should all pass.
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
When running following:
sudo ./ant run-test-suite -Dtest.component=service
-Dtest.suiteName=servicetests
I get:
/Users/s0001/Documents/workspace/ofbiz-trunk/build.xml:954: test.suiteName
is a required parameter: -Dtest.suiteName=testsuitename
and it fails
Test ran fine yesterday
ooops... let me check quickly and I will let you know
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
When running following:
sudo ./ant run-test-suite -Dtest.component=service
-Dtest.suiteName=servicetests
I get:
Pierre, my fault, I have now fixed it.
Thanks,
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
ooops... let me check quickly and I will let you know
Jacopo
On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
When running following:
sudo ./ant run-test-suite
With ant run load-demo run-tests
I have now only those failed on XP
facilitytestsinventory-tests.testGetInventoryAvailableByFacilityFailureAssertion failed: [quantityOnHandTotal=507] equals 509 as
BigDecimal
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Assertion failed:
[quantityOnHandTotal=507]
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release Apache OFBiz
10.04 (aka 10.04.01).
The release files can be downloaded from here:
Success here now
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
With ant run load-demo run-tests
I have now only those failed on XP
facilitytestsinventory-tests.testGetInventoryAvailableByFacilityFailureAssertion failed: [quantityOnHandTotal=507] equals 509 as
BigDecimal
+1
--
Ashish
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will
+1
Op 11 april 2012 13:18 schreef Ashish Vijaywargiya
vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com het volgende:
+1
--
Ashish
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
+1
Thanks Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the
All seems OK here +1
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04 branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major
release number: 10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4793:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
unify admin port and key setting: single point of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251494#comment-13251494
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4793:
Hi Francis,
It looks good to me
All,
+1
Regards,
Ankit Jain
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number:
Hi all,
On my Mac every individual test suite executes fine. This is also true for
my CI. But in my CI environment the testsuites for service and webapp
continue to fail due to defined ports already being used by other
production systems.
Aslo, running ant run-tests on my Mac fails.
Regards,
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Aslo, running ant run-tests on my Mac fails.
Pierre,
could you please confirm that you are running the tests on a clean system:
./ant clean-all load-data run-tests
?
I tested in my Mac a few minutes ago and it was successful.
Jacopo
Hi Adrian,
Is there a JIRA for this issue?
Regards,
Pierre
Op 11 april 2012 12:28 schreef adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com het
volgende:
I prefer to connect OFBiz to ESB via REST.
Manufacturing works okay. I found a bug in the BOM that causes an out of
memory error with large
Jacopo,
I made the same mistake as Jacques did, namely not doing the full cycle.
After I did that it sailed perfectly.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 11 april 2012 14:35 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Aslo,
+1
--
Chandan Khandelwal
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number:
Ok, thanks for confirming.
By the way, all the data updated by the tests should be rolled back after the
tests are completed, and so in theory it should be possible to execute
run-tests multiple times... I will try to investigate this but it is a
separate issue.
I think we can now conclude that
Hi all,
Although not fatal regarding testing, JCR calling (for lack of a better
word) triggers an error. See below:
[java] 23271 [main] INFO org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl -
Starting repository...
[java] 23277 [main] INFO
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.fs.local.LocalFileSystem -
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:44 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release Apache
+1
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release Apache
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Sorry, It may be out of context but should we add a note on the release page
just to clarify 10.04 - 10.04.01 ?
Yes, we will add a mention about this.
Thanks
Jacopo
Wonderful, thanks Jacopo
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Sorry, It may be out of context but should we add a note on the release page
just to clarify 10.04 - 10.04.01 ?
Yes, we will add a mention about
Hi all,
the following are housekeeping tasks that could be part of the SlimDown
roadmap we could do (help from the community would be highly appreciated)
related to the big number of jar files bundled with OFBiz:
* making sure all jar files are marked as binary
* making sure they are listed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251731#comment-13251731
]
Francis ANDRE commented on OFBIZ-4793:
--
Jacques
This is already the case:
Hi Jacopo,
How about using Apache Ivy more to manage dependencies. That way OFBiz
should reduce in size dramatically and the modifications of the licence and
notice file are trimmed down considerably.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 11 april 2012 18:49 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251826#comment-13251826
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4793 at 4/11/12 6:39 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251826#comment-13251826
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4793:
Francis,
Yes I know, but I mean instead
Hi Erwan,
I tried ant sonar (after doing a clean-all and load-demo) against my mySQL
where the repository of sonar resides and I got following:
/Users/s0001/Documents/workspace/ofbiz-trunk/build.xml:1060:
org.picocontainer.PicoLifecycleException: PicoLifecycleException: method
'public final
Le 11/04/2012 20:49, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
I tried ant sonar (after doing a clean-all and load-demo) against my mySQL
where the repository of sonar resides and I got following:
/Users/s0001/Documents/workspace/ofbiz-trunk/build.xml:1060:
org.picocontainer.PicoLifecycleException:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251902#comment-13251902
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4793 at 4/11/12 8:35 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4793.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Francis,
Your patch is in at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251905#comment-13251905
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4793:
Missed config.java in r1324989, added at
The problem with this approach: it does not work if you don't have an Internet
connection: blocking
-1
Jacques
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
Hi Jacopo,
How about using Apache Ivy more to manage dependencies. That way OFBiz
should reduce in size dramatically and the modifications
Hi Erwan,
I am a bit confused here. I have sonar running on a separate VM, with my db
on yet another VM. I have sonar running and according to what I see in
sonar.properties it looks ok.
Do you intend to say that I need an additional sonar.properties file in my
OFBiz download?
Regards,
Pierre
If you don't have an internet connection, you wouldn't be able to download
OFBiz.
Op 11 april 2012 22:44 schreef Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
het volgende:
The problem with this approach: it does not work if you don't have an
Internet connection: blocking
-1
Jacques
Le 11/04/2012 22:50, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
I am a bit confused here. I have sonar running on a separate VM, with my
db on yet another VM. I have sonar running and according to what I see
in sonar.properties it looks ok.
Do you intend to say that I need an additional sonar.properties
There are situations where you are able to download and then deploy where you don't have a connection. If then things change it can
turn in a nightmare
Also there are situations where, etc... Think about it, not only your way...
It's ok for secondary libs, and most often used for those we can't
Tomorrow a little tweak will be necessary on trunk demo, I will do...
Jacques
From: jler...@apache.org
Author: jleroux
Date: Wed Apr 11 20:32:35 2012
New Revision: 1324989
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1324989view=rev
Log:
A patch from Francis ANDRE unify admin port and key setting:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burns updated OFBIZ-4797:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4797 eCommerce Draft.patch
Need a second pair of eyes.
This patch follows the
Add Support for Dependent Country State Drop Downs to SFA New Postal Address
-
Key: OFBIZ-4801
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4801
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burns updated OFBIZ-4801:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4801 SFA.patch
Add Support for Dependent Country State Drop Downs to SFA New
Pierre,
I agree with Jacques on this point. ESB could be a difficult solution to
install and to maintain with different third system. I think the SOAP
and XML-RPC, that we already installed for our customers is a good way
to do.
For the other question, we have customers experiences on
51 matches
Mail list logo
