[discussion] With plugins, is hot-deploy necessary?

This discussion is in reference to... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9244 http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/plugin-and-hotdeploy-td4702922.html Now that plugins has been implemented, would hot-deploy be necessary? As I've mentions in OFBIZ-9244, I think keeping hot-deploy would be

Re: port mapping 8080 to 8443 is broken

Okay so it seems this issue was introduced by your work based on what I read in jira. I don't think you should apply code changes that cause regressions like this one. On Mar 3, 2017 4:40 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: > Le 02/03/2017 à 17:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit

Re: Should be keep the multitenant feature even if broken?

All good points Michael. Replacing is neither short term nor easy as many places in the code base depend on this feature, not to mention the need for community approval too. I just mentioned this as an alternative solution from a technical standpoint. So our best bet is to fix the issue mentioned

Re: Should be keep the multitenant feature even if broken?

Hi Taher, I don't think that this is a valid short-term approach. As far as I know, there are users and also service providers relying on the multi-tenant feature and we should have a mid- to long-term roadmap for a migration to other solutions. It would be really helpful to have some

Re: Should be keep the multitenant feature even if broken?

Thanks Taher, IMO if we do that we should document clearly how to do it, before dropping and cleaning the multi-tenancy feature. Of course solving the 2 issues reported in OFBIZ-9230 (checkRhsType and getSystemPropertyValue) should be tried before. I'll not create Jiras for that before we get

Re: port mapping 8080 to 8443 is broken

Le 02/03/2017 à 17:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 02/03/2017 à 15:52, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : I'm not sure who committed what, but now the automatic redirection from 8080 to 8443 ssl is broken. Jacques is this related to your work on port offset stuff? This is only with localhost, right?

Re: Should be keep the multitenant feature even if broken?

In my opinion, the multi-tenancy feature can be reasonably replaced with non-java databases like mysql and postgres combined with docker. Both instances share the same code base but with two different runtime volumes and two databases. This would actually reduce the complexity of the code base,

Re: About https://github.com/apache/ofbiz

:) Le 03/03/2017 à 10:48, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Ah you did , cool! I guess I reopened an old tab due to my crazy, but working, FF config :D Jacques

Re: About https://github.com/apache/ofbiz

Ah you did , cool! I guess I reopened an old tab due to my crazy, but working, FF config :D Jacques Le 03/03/2017 à 10:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Yes, thanks Nicolas, They actually (@Pono on Hipchat infra at least) know it already. It would be good if you pushed them a bit at

Re: About https://github.com/apache/ofbiz

Yes, thanks Nicolas, They actually (@Pono on Hipchat infra at least) know it already. It would be good if you pushed them a bit at INFRA-13557 :) Jacques Le 03/03/2017 à 10:30, Nicolas Malin a écrit : Thnaks Jacques, I complete your issue because the I found the repository

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk-framework

Le 03/03/2017 à 09:01, build...@apache.org a écrit : The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/5 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for

Re: About https://github.com/apache/ofbiz

Thnaks Jacques, I complete your issue because the I found the repository git://git.apache.org/ofbiz-framework.git but unusable. Now we need to wait the infra to understand why the Git is break :| Nicolas Le 21/02/2017 à 16:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : OK, again :/ I closed INFRA-13497

buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk-framework

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/5 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: forced: by