Re: buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins
Please follow, this is related to http://markmail.org/message/vltmfn6x7wsfpss2 Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 13:18, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : So it seems like we have faulty buildbot scripts again. I feel inclined to rewrite them from scratch. Anyone interested in helping out? On Jan 11, 2018 3:16 PM, wrote: The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/builds/16 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: orcus_ubuntu Build Reason: downstream Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk] 1820862 Blamelist: jleroux BUILD FAILED: failed shell_4 Sincerely, -The Buildbot
Re: buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins
So it seems like we have faulty buildbot scripts again. I feel inclined to rewrite them from scratch. Anyone interested in helping out? On Jan 11, 2018 3:16 PM, wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder > ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins while building . Full details are available at: > https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/builds/16 > > Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ > > Buildslave for this Build: orcus_ubuntu > > Build Reason: downstream > Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk] 1820862 > Blamelist: jleroux > > BUILD FAILED: failed shell_4 > > Sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > > >
Re: svn commit: r1820848 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
Indeed, thanks Michael, fixed Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 12:31, Michael Brohl a écrit : Interesting, ummhh, "log message"... Am 11.01.18 um 10:19 schrieb jler...@apache.org: Author: jleroux Date: Thu Jan 11 09:19:26 2018 New Revision: 1820848 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820848&view=rev Log: Implemented: Improved: Documented: Completed: Reverted: Fixed: (OFBIZ-) Explanation Thanks: Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820848&r1=1820847&r2=1820848&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Thu Jan 11 09:19:26 2018 @@ -19,18 +19,6 @@ under the License. ## What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are - -### Pros -* Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. -* The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. -* The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way - -### Cons -* You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts. -* Despite the "compiler" you sometimes get unexpected result when you don't completely master BuildBot concepts. You must then ask infra for help, either on [HipChat infra room](https://apache.hipchat.com/chat/room/669587) or though the [service desk](https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/create/3) - ## OFBiz and BuildBot [Here is the OFBiz BuildBot script](https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/ofbiz.conf) Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820848&r1=1820847&r2=1820848&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Thu Jan 11 09:19:26 2018 @@ -28,20 +28,6 @@ under the License. --> What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools href="https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are -Pros - -Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. -The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. -The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) - -The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way - -Cons - -You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts. -Despite the "compiler" you sometimes get unexpected result when you don't completely master BuildBot concepts. You must then ask infra for help, either on https://apache.hipchat.com/chat/room/669587";>HipChat infra room or though the href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/create/3";>service desk - OFBiz and BuildBot https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/ofbiz.conf";>Here is the OFBiz BuildBot script You can see the OFBiz builders and their states in the https://ci.apache.org/waterfall";>common Buildbot waterfall view (look for "ofb"). Here are the test results
Re: svn commit: r1820848 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
Interesting, ummhh, "log message"... Am 11.01.18 um 10:19 schrieb jler...@apache.org: Author: jleroux Date: Thu Jan 11 09:19:26 2018 New Revision: 1820848 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820848&view=rev Log: Implemented: Improved: Documented: Completed: Reverted: Fixed: (OFBIZ-) Explanation Thanks: Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820848&r1=1820847&r2=1820848&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Thu Jan 11 09:19:26 2018 @@ -19,18 +19,6 @@ under the License. ## What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are - -### Pros -* Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. -* The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. -* The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way - -### Cons -* You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts. -* Despite the "compiler" you sometimes get unexpected result when you don't completely master BuildBot concepts. You must then ask infra for help, either on [HipChat infra room](https://apache.hipchat.com/chat/room/669587) or though the [service desk](https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/create/3) - ## OFBiz and BuildBot [Here is the OFBiz BuildBot script](https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/ofbiz.conf) Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820848&r1=1820847&r2=1820848&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Thu Jan 11 09:19:26 2018 @@ -28,20 +28,6 @@ under the License. --> What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are -Pros - -Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. -The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. -The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) - -The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way - -Cons - -You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts. -Despite the "compiler" you sometimes get unexpected result when you don't completely master BuildBot concepts. You must then ask infra for help, either on https://apache.hipchat.com/chat/room/669587";>HipChat infra room or though the https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/create/3";>service desk - OFBiz and BuildBot https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/ofbiz.conf";>Here is the OFBiz BuildBot script You can see the OFBiz builders and their states in the https://ci.apache.org/waterfall";>common Buildbot waterfall view (look for "ofb"). Here are the test results smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: svn commit: r1820671 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
Thank you, Jacques. Regards, Michael Am 11.01.18 um 10:19 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: OK OK, done :-D Thanks for your collaboration Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 09:50, Michael Brohl a écrit : I think the (valid) point is that documentation should be written in a neutral form and not from a personal perspective. They should also not express personal opinions by single persons. If we want to express opinions at all, they should be officially decided by the community explicitly. It feels somewhat strange that you want others to correct this instead of doing it yourself. Michael Am 11.01.18 um 09:29 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: As I said, feel free to improve. You can remove this section if you want Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 07:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Why are you putting your opinion and referencing pros and cons of buildbot in a documentation file? Documentation is supposed to be a source for explaining what things are and how they work, not what you think of them! Typing "IMO" in a documentation is really strange to me. On Jan 9, 2018 6:20 PM, wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 New Revision: 1820671 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820671&view=rev Log: Fixes(?) MD syntax for HTML import Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ BuilbBot documentation OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are + ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ under the License. BuilbBot documentation What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. * The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way +IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are +Pros + +Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. +The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. +The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) + +The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way + Cons You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: svn commit: r1820671 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
OK OK, done :-D Thanks for your collaboration Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 09:50, Michael Brohl a écrit : I think the (valid) point is that documentation should be written in a neutral form and not from a personal perspective. They should also not express personal opinions by single persons. If we want to express opinions at all, they should be officially decided by the community explicitly. It feels somewhat strange that you want others to correct this instead of doing it yourself. Michael Am 11.01.18 um 09:29 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: As I said, feel free to improve. You can remove this section if you want Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 07:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Why are you putting your opinion and referencing pros and cons of buildbot in a documentation file? Documentation is supposed to be a source for explaining what things are and how they work, not what you think of them! Typing "IMO" in a documentation is really strange to me. On Jan 9, 2018 6:20 PM, wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 New Revision: 1820671 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820671&view=rev Log: Fixes(?) MD syntax for HTML import Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ BuilbBot documentation OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are + ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ under the License. BuilbBot documentation What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. * The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way +IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are +Pros + +Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. +The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. +The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) + +The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way + Cons You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts.
[FYI] BuildBot config issue (but not OFBiz-BuilDBot config)
Hi, Here we go again: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15829 Jacques
Re: svn commit: r1820671 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
I think the (valid) point is that documentation should be written in a neutral form and not from a personal perspective. They should also not express personal opinions by single persons. If we want to express opinions at all, they should be officially decided by the community explicitly. It feels somewhat strange that you want others to correct this instead of doing it yourself. Michael Am 11.01.18 um 09:29 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: As I said, feel free to improve. You can remove this section if you want Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 07:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Why are you putting your opinion and referencing pros and cons of buildbot in a documentation file? Documentation is supposed to be a source for explaining what things are and how they work, not what you think of them! Typing "IMO" in a documentation is really strange to me. On Jan 9, 2018 6:20 PM, wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 New Revision: 1820671 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820671&view=rev Log: Fixes(?) MD syntax for HTML import Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ BuilbBot documentation OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are + ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ under the License. BuilbBot documentation What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools href=" https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. * The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way +IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are +Pros + +Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. +The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. +The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) + +The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way + Cons You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: svn commit: r1820671 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
It's not a matter of improving it's a matter of principle. I think you are making an argument in a place not designed for arguments. Arguments happen in the mailing list or in JIRA comments, not documentation, commit logs, or other such references. I hope we agree at least on this principle and if you do agree then may I suggest you remove the sections that are opinion based. On Jan 11, 2018 11:30 AM, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: > As I said, feel free to improve. You can remove this section if you want > > Jacques > > Le 11/01/2018 à 07:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > >> Why are you putting your opinion and referencing pros and cons of buildbot >> in a documentation file? Documentation is supposed to be a source for >> explaining what things are and how they work, not what you think of them! >> Typing "IMO" in a documentation is really strange to me. >> >> On Jan 9, 2018 6:20 PM, wrote: >> >> Author: jleroux >>> Date: Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 >>> New Revision: 1820671 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820671&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Fixes(?) MD syntax for HTML import >>> >>> Modified: >>> ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md >>> ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html >>> >>> Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/ >>> BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff >>> >>> == >>> --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) >>> +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 >>> 2018 >>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ BuilbBot documentation >>> OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its >>> Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the >>> ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). >>> >>> IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are >>> + >>> ### Pros >>> * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't >>> have >>> to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. >>> * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. >>> >>> Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/ >>> BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff >>> >>> == >>> --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) >>> +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 >>> 2018 >>> @@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ under the License. >>> BuilbBot documentation >>> What is BuilbBot and why >>> using it? >>> OFBiz uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot >>> ">BuilbBot >>> as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools >> href=" >>> https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. >>> -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are ### Pros * Compared to a tool like >>> Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write >>> scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well >>> documented, some prefer intuitive UI. * The infra team at the ASF >>> provides >>> a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script >>> (the builders are all common to the ASF) >>> -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in >>> a >>> very efficient way >>> +IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are >>> +Pros >>> + >>> +Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't >>> have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. >>> +The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive >>> UI. >>> +The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents >>> to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the >>> ASF) >>> + >>> +The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help >>> in >>> a very efficient way >>> + >>> Cons >>> >>> You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer >>> UIs >>> to scripts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >
Re: svn commit: r1820671 - in /ofbiz/tools: documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
As I said, feel free to improve. You can remove this section if you want Jacques Le 11/01/2018 à 07:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Why are you putting your opinion and referencing pros and cons of buildbot in a documentation file? Documentation is supposed to be a source for explaining what things are and how they work, not what you think of them! Typing "IMO" in a documentation is really strange to me. On Jan 9, 2018 6:20 PM, wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 New Revision: 1820671 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820671&view=rev Log: Fixes(?) MD syntax for HTML import Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ BuilbBot documentation OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the ASF](https://ci.apache.org/). IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are + ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/ BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff == --- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original) +++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Tue Jan 9 15:20:58 2018 @@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ under the License. BuilbBot documentation What is BuilbBot and why using it? OFBiz uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF. -IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are ### Pros * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. * The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) -* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way +IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are +Pros + +Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some. +The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI. +The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the ASF) + +The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a very efficient way + Cons You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs to scripts.
