Thanks, Sharan for bringing this thread back to life :-)
After a long break in this, I am also now available for this effort.
- Best Regards,
Swapnil M Mane
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:55 PM Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
> If there are any volunteers that need mentoring at this moment I might
> be able
Hi ,
I strongly feel we should.
For me, multi-tenency is the key feature in supporting more number of
organisations
with a single instance of Java/tomcat. Think of running 20 under-utilized
OFBiz instances
each *locking* up say 1GB ram versus 1 multi-tenant OFBiz instance
allocated with a
copio
Hi Jacques,
Honestly I was shocked by this email, I'm working on deploying OFBiz in
Kubernetes, are you monitoring me?
In 2010, Kubernetes was quite new and not good enough, now it's the standard on
cloud deploy management, and we can support it.
Before doing that, we have to answer some commo
+1 Taher for checking the dependencies of OFBiz users on tenant feature.
As both the options create multiple numbers of databases. Before
deprecating/removing multi-tenancy, we should check all the pros and cons
of the Multi-instance option as an alternate in OFBiz.
We will not want to add another
Le 29/08/2018 à 12:05, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
If some project decides to drop multi-tenancy I don't
think we should be influenced or automatically follow suit. So naming
who-did-what might not important for this discussion and we need to
bake our own bread.
I was not influenced by David's dec
Before we deprecate this feature (if ever) we should provide a well
designed, fully tested and established alternative as well as a
migration path and good documentation.
I propose to do any work on this in another branch to prevent any
distraction in trunk until this change is fully establish
I'll soon provide an AsciiDoc for that. I have to think about its location, any
ideas?
Jacques
Le 29/08/2018 à 12:06, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
I couldn't find the testing mechanism and the JIRA is filled with too
much information. Sharing a simple testing mechanism would help
On Wed, Aug 29,
Yes you are right, I'll start a discussion on user ML.
I already know that Pierre Smits uses it for his own projects, and indeed we
know there are more people using it.
This said it should not prevent us to deprecate it and users to continue to use
it based on R17 branch.
They could then swit
+1 to move forward.
Julien.
Le 09/08/2018 à 17:31, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Hello Everyone,
We want to make this formal with proper community consensus and I will
try to keep this short.
In [1] Mathieu Lirzin is providing some (in my opinion) good work on
converting the Control Servlet logi
I couldn't find the testing mechanism and the JIRA is filled with too
much information. Sharing a simple testing mechanism would help
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:33 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
>
> Hi Taher,
>
> Before creating the last patch, I have reviewed the code a last time again,
> it's total
Multi-tenancy complicates things, and the code could be made simpler
by removing it in many areas of the system. So technically, I'm for
that.
However, the issue here is whether enough people depend on it. I saw
multiple questions in the mailing list in the past about multi-tenancy
in the past, so
oOps, I missed to finish a sentence... amended inline...
Le 27/08/2018 à 10:15, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael, All,
First, thank you Michael for your effort in trying to clarify what to discuss in dev ML (this has already been , when to revert a commit, and I'll
add relations with Jira
Hi,
The multi-tenants feature in OFBiz only allows a dozens or maybe even few
hundreds tenants, after it begin to be a lot of DBs!
I faced that with a startup which wanted to handle thousands, if not millions
(actually they failed), of tenants, obviously OFBiz can't do that.
I don't break any
Hi Taher,
Before creating the last patch, I have reviewed the code a last time again, it's totally OK now. Did you test from
https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/FindCatalog with the provided test patch?
I'll now provide a simple and concise AsciiDoc documentation. Maybe with a
graph, but
Hi Shi,
Verified the fix by Mathieu on the local machine, the system is working
fine now.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Nigam
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi Taher,
>
> Thank you for summarizing. I agree with thi
15 matches
Mail list logo