Re: [DOC] Re-starting our OFBiz Documentation Effort

Thanks, Sharan for bringing this thread back to life :-) After a long break in this, I am also now available for this effort. - Best Regards, Swapnil M Mane On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:55 PM Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > If there are any volunteers that need mentoring at this moment I might > be able

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Hi , I strongly feel we should. For me, multi-tenency is the key feature in supporting more number of organisations with a single instance of Java/tomcat. Think of running 20 under-utilized OFBiz instances each *locking* up say 1GB ram versus 1 multi-tenant OFBiz instance allocated with a copio

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Hi Jacques, Honestly I was shocked by this email, I'm working on deploying OFBiz in Kubernetes, are you monitoring me? In 2010, Kubernetes was quite new and not good enough, now it's the standard on cloud deploy management, and we can support it. Before doing that, we have to answer some commo

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

+1 Taher for checking the dependencies of OFBiz users on tenant feature. As both the options create multiple numbers of databases. Before deprecating/removing multi-tenancy, we should check all the pros and cons of the Multi-instance option as an alternate in OFBiz. We will not want to add another

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Le 29/08/2018 à 12:05, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : If some project decides to drop multi-tenancy I don't think we should be influenced or automatically follow suit. So naming who-did-what might not important for this discussion and we need to bake our own bread. I was not influenced by David's dec

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Before we deprecate this feature (if ever) we should provide a well designed, fully tested and established alternative as well as a migration path and good documentation. I propose to do any work on this in another branch to prevent any distraction in trunk until this change is fully establish

Re: OFBIZ-10307: Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed in authentication

I'll soon provide an AsciiDoc for that. I have to think about its location, any ideas? Jacques Le 29/08/2018 à 12:06, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : I couldn't find the testing mechanism and the JIRA is filled with too much information. Sharing a simple testing mechanism would help On Wed, Aug 29,

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Yes you are right, I'll start a discussion on user ML. I already know that Pierre Smits uses it for his own projects, and indeed we know there are more people using it. This said it should not prevent us to deprecate it and users to continue to use it based on R17 branch. They could then swit

Re: [Proposal] Enhance the controller logic to accommodate HTTP methods and prepare for REST

+1 to move forward. Julien. Le 09/08/2018 à 17:31, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Hello Everyone, We want to make this formal with proper community consensus and I will try to keep this short. In [1] Mathieu Lirzin is providing some (in my opinion) good work on converting the Control Servlet logi

Re: OFBIZ-10307: Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed in authentication

I couldn't find the testing mechanism and the JIRA is filled with too much information. Sharing a simple testing mechanism would help On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:33 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi Taher, > > Before creating the last patch, I have reviewed the code a last time again, > it's total

Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Multi-tenancy complicates things, and the code could be made simpler by removing it in many areas of the system. So technically, I'm for that. However, the issue here is whether enough people depend on it. I saw multiple questions in the mailing list in the past about multi-tenancy in the past, so

Re: Policy on commit

oOps, I missed to finish a sentence... amended inline... Le 27/08/2018 à 10:15, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Michael, All, First, thank you Michael for your effort in trying to clarify what to discuss in dev ML (this has already been , when to revert a commit, and I'll add relations with Jira

Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?

Hi, The multi-tenants feature in OFBiz only allows a dozens or maybe even few hundreds tenants, after it begin to be a lot of DBs! I faced that with a startup which wanted to handle thousands, if not millions (actually they failed), of tenants, obviously OFBiz can't do that. I don't break any

Re: OFBIZ-10307: Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed in authentication

Hi Taher, Before creating the last patch, I have reviewed the code a last time again,  it's totally OK now. Did you test from https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/FindCatalog with the provided test patch? I'll now provide a simple and concise AsciiDoc documentation. Maybe with a graph, but

Re: [Proposal] Enhance the controller logic to accommodate HTTP methods and prepare for REST

Hi Shi, Verified the fix by Mathieu on the local machine, the system is working fine now. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Nigam HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > Thank you for summarizing. I agree with thi