Reviving the OFBiz community day

Hello team, We are having a great community, I would like to thank everyone for their participation. In year 2017, we start celebrating the OFBiz community days [1]. The contribution during community days played very significant role in improvement of framework. Should we start this celebration

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

A bit out of subject, just to complete the discussion because nobody spoke about. The entities are defined with no-auto-stamp="false" by default so it's possible to change this default. Of course 'createdByUserLogin' and 'lastModifiedByUserLogin' fields are not concerned, it was just to

Re: Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Enable entity timestamp fields

Thanks Guys, Makes sense to me Jacques Le 24/04/2019 à 08:36, Deepak Dixit a écrit : On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:58 AM Nicolas Malin wrote: Hello, On 24/04/2019 08:01, Deepak Dixit wrote: I think it's removed while converting find generic ftl to form widget at OFBIZ-9217 Yes it's me :)

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

I am not able to find the thread, But I remember we had already a discussion regarding the same topic. Kind Regards, Deepak Dixit On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:37 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > I have not time to elaborate in-depth right now, but just a quick food > for thought: > > Having these

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

Michael, Thank you for details, all makes sense. Best Regards, -- *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P 452010 Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

I have not time to elaborate in-depth right now, but just a quick food for thought: Having these fields in every entity *by default* allows detailed tracking of users which might be unwanted. I know that this is a sensible topic in companies and affects privacy protection. I am not sure how

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

Thanks Michael, So we should keep those *TxStamp fields. But what about the second suggestion about having the 'createdByUserLogin' and 'lastModifiedByUserLogin' fields added to the internal fields set? Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

These fields are not the same, they can differ. The TX fields mark the transaction timestamp while the non TX fields mark the "real" update time. You can see it when you watch closely in the database. All changes made within an transaction have the same tx timestamp. Regards, Michael Brohl

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

Dear Pierre, I'm not aware of history of this duplicate entries. I agree with you on removing duplicate fields. Also agree with adding created user and updated user fields as default. Few points for open discussion for community; - There are many entities already have user fields, so do we need

Re: Adding Apache License link in main navigation (footer) of OFBiz site

Sure Deepak, thank you for the comment. - Best Regards, Swapnil M Mane, ofbiz.apache.org On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:49 AM Deepak Dixit wrote: > Hi Swapnil, > > I think we should use the following link as licenses > https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > Kind Regards, > Deepak Dixit

[PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

Hi All, Currently our functions inject following internal fields into the model of each entity: - createdStamp - createdTxStamp - lastUpdatedStamp - lastUpdatedTxStamp All of the fields above are of the field type definition 'date-time', giving for java: java.sql.Timestamp, and for

Re: Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Enable entity timestamp fields

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:58 AM Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hello, > > On 24/04/2019 08:01, Deepak Dixit wrote: > > I think it's removed while converting find generic ftl to form widget > > at OFBIZ-9217 > Yes it's me :) > >>> Was it intentional? If yes what was the reason? > Yes and not, when I

Re: Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Enable entity timestamp fields

Hello, On 24/04/2019 08:01, Deepak Dixit wrote: I think it's removed while converting find generic ftl to form widget at OFBIZ-9217 Yes it's me :) Was it intentional? If yes what was the reason? Yes and not, when I converted it to widget screen I did a choice slim code, increase

Re: Adding Apache License link in main navigation (footer) of OFBiz site

Hi Swapnil, I think we should use the following link as licenses https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Kind Regards, Deepak Dixit On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:52 AM Swapnil M Mane wrote: > Hello team, > > Whimsy site check [1] showing the fail result in 'License' check type for > OFBiz

Re: Day name and Month Name

Hi Deepak, Thanks, I found the solution while working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10947 Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator

Re: Day name and Month Name

Hi Pierre, You can use SimpleDateFormat or DateFormatSymbols class to achieve your requirements Kind Regards, On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 4:52 PM Pierre Smits wrote: > HI all, > > Are there functions in ofbiz to get: > >1. the name of the Day given a particular date? And equally to get the >

Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Enable entity timestamp fields

I think it's removed while converting find generic ftl to form widget at OFBIZ-9217 >>Was it intentional? If yes what was the reason? I think it's not intentional, form widget auto-fields-entity exclude the stamp filed, that's why it's not rendering on webtools find generic page. Kind Regards,