the form from the target
and evaluating statements addressing the targetting fields.
Any advice on how to fix, or whether set_multivalues() was not intended for
this use case gratefully received.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
OFBIZ-11274 created to address this with patch attached.
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 20:38, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to make use of the set_multivalues() function in fieldlookup.js
> from a lookup form to be able to populate multiple fields on a form in a
> postal
ntributions evaluated by community
> members
> >>> and when good incorporated into the OFBiz repositories.
> >>>
> >>> A pull request can contain one or more commits (from the contributor
> >>> - or
> >>> in git parlance: the author).
> >>>
> >>> So, when the commit message by the contributor (author) of each of his
> >>> commits is formatted in accordance with the commit-message template
> >>> there
> >>> is nothing that stands in the way to take it to the next step. Which
> >>> is the
> >>> evaluation of the contribution by other community members.
> >>>
> >>> Is my assessment so far correct?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Pierre Smits
> >>>
> >>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
> >>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> >>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> >>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without
> >>> privileges)
> >>> since 2008*
> >>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
> >>>
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
d be to rename those to fit the default settings.
>
> * should we start an initiative to remove the valid errors like we did
> with the FindBugs initiative some time ago?
>
>
> Thanks for your feedback,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
e dependency
injection. But I also wouldn't stand in the way of later conversion to
Mockito if the community wanted it.
In summary, I'm asking the community to accept introduction of a new
mocking library to support a longer term piece of refactoring work.
Committers! Bring me your +1 and lets get these PRs merged :)
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17042669
Thanks,
Dan.
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 13:02, Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> why would you prefer JMockit over Mockito?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 02.03.20 um 11:
Lirzin
wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Daniel Watford writes:
>
> > I don't have a preference between the two mocking libraries, but creating
> > unit tests for MacroFormRenderer necessitates mocking static methods.
> > Mockito doesn't offer static method mocking, but JMockit
as an indicator that a class might benefit
from some architectural refactoring, but at least we'd have some tests in
place to help us ensure behaviour is not broken.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 18:54, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've replaced the original PRs with a few more foc
s
>
> Le 28/02/2020 à 11:24, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hi Jacques,
> >
> > I haven't been able to come up with an explanation for what you're
> seeing,
> > so through I'd post some of my configuration and results to see if we can
> > spot anything odd.
> >
&
Issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11428 raised and PR
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/36 created
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 10:24, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Jacques,
>
> I haven't been able to come up with an explanation for what you're seeing,
> so
to 956.
Dan
--
Daniel Watford
input
file:C:/Program Files/Git/etc/gitconfig core.fscache=true
file:C:/Program Files/Git/etc/gitconfig core.symlinks=false
file:C:/Program Files/Git/etc/gitconfig credential.helper=manager
file:C:/Users/DanielWatford/.gitconfig user.name=Daniel Watford
file:C:/Users/DanielWatford/.gitconfig user.email
to take advantage of more up-to-date
functionality?
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
Hello,
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11415 as a
request to backport functionality introduced to trunk by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11330.
PR created: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/31
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
Hello,
In a current project being built on top of Ofbiz I have a form for editing
details of a freight transport job. Each job has multiple roles performed
by different parties - Shipper, Consignee, Agent, BILL_TO_PARTY, etc.
The client required that the party contact details for each role be
iel,
>
> Thanks for your detailed proposal. I checked your work and it's
> interesting way.
>
> Can you open an issue on https://issues.apache.org/jira, I will commit
> your widget improvement in code base.
>
> Nicolas
> On 23/01/2020 22:03, Daniel Watford wrote:
>
rectory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
--
Daniel Watford
a rendered FTL macro string
The refactoring is probably preferable in the long run, but felt too large
a task for this particular ticket.
What do you think? Can we permit the JMockit tests until some refactoring
is carried out?
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
be committed.
The 4th PR:
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/27
covers the introduction of JMockit needed to test the MacroFormRenderer as
described in my previous email.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 18:32, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Two PRs have bee
OFBIZ-11418
> in at least R18 if nobody is against
> >
> > As I said already, I'm also considering the related OFBIZ-4035 and will
> work on it next week, if nobody beats me on it...
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 25/02/2020 à 15:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> >
,
> > >
> > > please have a look at the solutions provided in
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10407.
> > >
> > > The main questions for the mailing list:
> > >
> > > 1. do we want to add and maintain Docker files in our codebase?
> > >
> > > 2. if yes, which version should we use?
> > >
> > > 3. if yes, additionally: would it be a good idea to place OFBiz Docker
> > > images on docker hub and maintain them?
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Michael Brohl
> > >
> > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Daniel Watford
on this.
>
> [1]: https://qaplug.com/
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Suraj Khurana
> Senior Technical Consultant
>
--
Daniel Watford
Hi again - I forgot the links!
[1] - https://projectlombok.org/features/experimental/UtilityClass
[2] - https://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1216151=4
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 17:38, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Suraj,
>
> If the class author's intention was to create a util
/01/building-apache-ofbiz-docker-images/
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 15:28, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Sorry for coming back to this so late, but I thought I'd share how I have
> my project setup for docker and pushing to a test environment in case its
> of any use to you.
>> Just my 2 cents.
> >>
> >> -1 for using Lombok plugin in OFBiz.
> >>
> >> I had some not good experiences with this plugin in Apereo CAS 5.3.x.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 发送自 Windows 10 版邮件<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink
à 09:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > We did not make an official vote yet. As it's an important matter, I'll
> start a vote in order to decide if we should, or not, use Lombok inside
> > OFBiz OOTB.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jac
] - https://projectlombok.org/
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 15:53, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'd encourage tool use to help us produce software wherever possible,
> particularly those which are common in the java ecosystem and have a low
> barrier to entry. In my opinion Lombok i
>>> Le 23/05/2020 à 17:29, Suraj Khurana a écrit :
> >>>> Hello Devs,
> >>>>
> >>>> Recently we are facing some checkstyle issues and one cause of it is
> >>>> LineLength property.
> >>>> Currently we have set it to 120, I think we should make it to 150
> >>> instead.
> >>>> It is pretty visible in 13/14 font sizes as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please share your thoughts on this.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Suraj Khurana
> >>>> Senior Technical Consultant
> >>>>
>
--
Daniel Watford
;
> >
> > I certainly support running each of the parameter sets as an individual
> test, i.e. test counters go up per set executed.
> > I will try both suggestions, the one you suggested and the one from the
> link above.
> >
> > Warm regards
> >
> >
>
t ServiceUtil.isFailure(result)
> }
> }
> }
>
>
>
> This hint certainly has to do with the implementation I need to do for
> such test cases using annotations to mark the class as @Parameterized,
> define the @Parameters and then mark the @Test that uses the parameters.
>
> Before I dive too much into web search:
> - has anyone attempted this for OFBiz unit Testing? (And hence the reason
> why no implementation is avail)
>
> Thanks for a hint :)
> Warm regards
>
>
> Carsten
>
>
>
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
> > > through the changes and test at your end and let me know your thoughts.
> > >
> > > I am planning to do some refactoring and then raise initial PR for the
> > > plug-in if the changes look good to everyone.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Girish
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:54 PM Carsten Schinzer <
> > > cars...@dcs-verkaufssysteme.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Girish,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to clarify :)
> > > > What caught me on the OpenAPI integration is the snippet quoted below
> > and
> > > > I realize I should have read it in context. Actually then it is
> aligned
> > > > with my view.
> > > >
> > > > Warm regards
> > > >
> > > > Carsten
> > > >
> > > > >>>>> Initial implementation does not contain OpenApi integration
> yet.
> > > And
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Daniel Watford
.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 08:38, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone else check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11954
> ?
>
> TIA
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
I will soon add an API endpoint to issue JWTs and will update README
> accordingly. I hope that answers your question.
>
> Best Regards,
> Girish
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:21 PM Daniel Watford wrote:
>
> > Hi Girish,
> >
> >
broken by the
WidgetWorker changes.
If the HTML Render package is no longer in use can we remove it?
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
] - https://plugins.gradle.org/plugin/io.freefair.lombok
[4] - https://projectlombok.org/setup/gradle
[5] - https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/6317-lombok/
[6] - https://projectlombok.org/setup/overview
--
Daniel Watford
dvantages are?
>
> Is it worth the introduction of an additional framework, more complex
> IDE configuration, an additional Gradle plugin and more memory
> consumption and why?
>
> Thanks for clarification,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 28.
t; If the HTML Render package is no longer in use can we remove it?
> > I think it's a good question you asked, it needs more attention.
> > It could be used by (old) custom projects. We can't be dragged down by
> > them eternally...
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Jacqu
and parameter values.
Please excuse the long message :) and please let me know if you have any
comments or concerns about the approach I have taken.
Thanks,
Dan.
[1] - https://github.com/danwatford/ofbiz-framework/tree/OFBIZ-11900-WIP
--
Daniel Watford
2020 at 20:45, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'ved added a PR for OFBIZ-12081 where I add a gradle runtime dependency
> to download a specific database driver. Currently I have only added a
> driver for Postgres, but it should be simple to nominate drivers for other
> D
/buildmaster/master1/projects/ofbiz.conf)
and requires authentication.
How do I get read access to the svn server? Or is there another location
where the buildbot configuration is stored that I can already access?
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
ver no
> > consensus yet.
> > I'm starting this thread after discussions on Slack with Jacques Le
> > Roux, Daniel Watford and Michael Brohl.
> >
> > The the aim to establish some goals / objectives regarding Docker and
> > OFBiz.
> >
> > Please add yo
using the docker image build above, including the PR changes.
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 at 10:24, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Some areas which could be improved on:
>
> - Building an image requires all gradle dependencies to be downloaded.
>
> Since the docker image is built in isolation, it
specifications which couple a docker image with a
particular DBMS, all running in their own containers.
Please let me know if there are any concerns with pre-configuring builds in
this way.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This was initially an Infra resources and indeed only committers have
> access .
>
> I can put a current copy in a Jira if you like?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 30/11/2020 à 11:08, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
&g
Stan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There has been some discussion regarding Docker and OFBiz, however no
> consensus yet.
> I'm starting this thread after discussions on Slack with Jacques Le
> Roux, Daniel Watford and Michael Brohl.
>
> The the aim to establish some goals / obj
ensing permits).
I wonder if the dev community sees any value in the gradle build approach
compared to manually creating Dockerfiles either directly in the
ofbiz-framework sources or held in another repository.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
the
developer to have various images built which address different PRs.
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 22:10, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following on from the various docker discussions I wanted to mention an
> approach of building a docker image based on the current development
>
; >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 1:32 PM Pritam Kute <
> pritam.k...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Emad,
> >>
> >> I have tried those changes and can confirm that those are working as
> >> expected.
Jan 2021 at 10:04, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:57 PM Daniel Watford wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> > But when should we remove the unused HTML renderers? Is it okay to remove
> > them from trunk at the same time as marking them deprecated in release
nt
> *HotWax Systems*
> *Enterprise open source experts*
> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:23 PM Daniel Watford wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I spent some more time trying to see if I could get IntelliJ to handle
> > gr
, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Pawan,
>
> I had to carry out one more step to get your solution to work for me.
>
> I'm running IntelliJ Ultimate 2020.3.1.
>
> I find that I get asked to configure a Groovy SDK for the first
> groovyScript file that I open in the IDE for any
lasspath when running gradle there is
> something in place:
>
> // Libraries downloaded manually
> implementation fileTree(dir: file("${rootDir}/lib"), include:
> '**/*.jar')
>
>
>
> --
> Eugen Stan
> +40720 898 747 / netdava.com
>
--
Daniel Watford
process for each new release branch created
>
> What do you people think?
>
> What about not removing in trunk before creating R21 as I believe most
> deprecations are old if not very old ones?
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 14/01/2021 à 14:57, Daniel Watford a écrit :
&g
the unused HTML renderers? Is it okay to remove
them from trunk at the same time as marking them deprecated in release 18?
This would ensure they are removed from whichever release is planned to
follow 18.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Daniel Watford
ote:
> Hi,
>
> Please see my reply inline:
>
> On 14.01.2021 16:21, Daniel Watford wrote:
> > Hi Eugen,
> >
> > I like the approach of a config directory which can be used to override
> > configuration files already compiled into a distribution
> (dist
(in the PR).
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 15:21, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi Daniel, James,
>
> Did we not recently discuss about splitting entityengine.xml and could not
> get a consensus? (I searched but did not find it)
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 14/01/2021 à
.
--
Daniel Watford
)
Then open invoice id 8010 (
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/invoiceOverview?invoiceId=8010)
and click the PDF button to generate an invoice.
Please let me know if you run into any problems or have any concerns about
using data-uris in this way.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
bizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/builds/1945
> >
> > Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
> >
> > Buildslave for this Build: asf945_ubuntu
> >
> > Build Reason: downstream
> > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk]
> 3795727ea2a61e686c1d09cfaa792914bd4f8730
&g
iel to become a new committer and we are
> > > pleased to announce that he has accepted the nomination.
> > >
> > > Welcome onboard Daniel!
> > >
> > > Jacopo
> > >
> >
>
--
Daniel Watford
olas
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11810
>
> On 28/07/2020 19:49, Daniel Watford wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > OFBIZ-11900 covers the work-in-progress effort to refactor
> > MacroFormRenderer by extracting code which builds strings to be
opriate container log file
> [...]
> SEVERE: Context [/marketing] startup failed due to previous errors
> [...]
> SEVERE: Context [/exampleext] startup failed due to previous errors
> [...]
> SEVERE: Context [/rest] startup failed due to previous errors
>
> Etc.
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
Please ignore me, Jaques!
For some reason, where you wrote 'backport', I read 'revert'! I incorrectly
thought you were proposing to revert OFBIZ-11960.
Sorry for any confusion caused.
Dan.
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 18:20, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Jacques,
>
> As far as I can tell
che.org
> because of a bug I reported at INFRA-22418 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22418>.
>
> If nobody objects I'll backport the work done for OFBIZ-11960 because it
> will secure our js libs usage
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
>
> > Le 31/08/2021 à 11:32, Gavin McDonald a écrit :
> >> I have created a Jira ticket where we can liaise on the migration which
> I
> >> would like to do ASAP.
> >
--
Daniel Watford
is managed in an
external User Directory and Jira is not able to update your password."
Can anyone tell me which system I need to access in order to reset my
password for https://issues.apache.org/jira?
I can still access Whimsy if that is of any use.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
ngsource.com.sun.syndication-1.0.0.pom'.
41
<https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/runs/3124562322?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:41>
> PKIX path building failed:
sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find
valid certification path to requested target
42
<https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/runs/3124562322?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:42>
--
Daniel Watford
elcome on board!
>
--
Daniel Watford
"employmentApp"/>
> > @@ -254,7 +251,8 @@ under the License.
> >
> >widget-style="smallSubmit">
> >
> > - paginate-target="FindJobInterview" odd-row-style="alternate-row"
> header-row-style="header-row-2" default-table-style="basic-table hover-bar">
> > + paginate-target="FindJobInterview"
> > +odd-row-style="alternate-row" header-row-style="header-row-2"
> default-table-style="basic-table hover-bar">
> >
> >
> >result-map-list="listIt">
> > @@ -289,7 +287,7 @@ under the License.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > +
> >target="updateJobInterview">
> >
> >value-field="JobInterview"/>
> > @@ -345,7 +343,7 @@ under the License.
> >target-form-name="LookupJobRequisition"/>
> >widget-style="smallSubmit">
> >
> > - odd-row-style="alternate-row" header-row-style="header-row-2"
> default-table-style="basic-table hover-bar">
> > + odd-row-style="alternate-row" header-row-style="header-row-2"
> default-table-style="basic-table hover-bar">
> >
> >
> >result-map-list="listIt">
> > @@ -363,7 +361,7 @@ under the License.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > +
> >description="${firstName} ${lastName}">
> >target-type="inter-app" description="${approverPartyId}"
> link-style="buttontext">
> >from-field="approverPartyId"/>
> > @@ -378,7 +376,7 @@ under the License.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > +
> >target="updateApprovalStatus" default-map-name="employmentApp">
> >map-name="employmentApp"/>
> >
> > @@ -417,7 +415,7 @@ under the License.
> >
> >widget-style="smallSubmit">
> >
> > - odd-row-style="alternate-row" header-row-style="header-row-2"
> > + odd-row-style="alternate-row" header-row-style="header-row-2"
> > default-table-style="basic-table hover-bar">
> >
> >result-map-list="listIt">
> > @@ -446,7 +444,7 @@ under the License.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > +
> >
> >
> > -
> > +
> >
>
--
Daniel Watford
--
Daniel Watford
:?]
at
org.apache.ofbiz.entity.transaction.GeronimoTransactionFactory.getConnection(GeronimoTransactionFactory.java:79)
~[ofbiz.jar:?]
at
org.apache.ofbiz.entity.jdbc.SQLProcessor.getConnection(SQLProcessor.java:261)
~[ofbiz.jar:?]
... 8 more
--
Daniel Watford
container build.
> >
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > --
> > Deepak Dixit
> > ofbiz.apache.org
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 2:22 PM Deepak Dixit wrote:
> >
> >> Sure Daniel!!
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
://www.netdava.com
>
--
Daniel Watford
will look to amend the demo-trunk site to be
hosted by a container in about 7 day's time.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
I just realised I gave this thread the wrong subject. It should have been
'Lazy consensus: Host demo-stable in a container.'
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:45, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Over the last few months we have been experiencing more frequent restarts
> of the VM used
there any specific reason to disable http/2 on demo-trunk?
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
> ofbiz.apache.org
>
--
Daniel Watford
specifically the `\r` string.
> Because the `StringEscapeUtils.unescapeEcmaScript()` parses the `\r`
> string as the **line break character**, and the comparison doesn't match.
> So for us, in this case, the security validation doesn't allow the
> string even though there is no security issue.
>
> Could someone give some guidance or explanation on why this is done like
> this ?
> Thanks a lot in advance
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
t, but we are
> in the process of doing that.
>
> jQuery is done, but not all the jQuery plugins:
>
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/trunk/themes/common-theme/webapp/common-theme/js/package.json#L11
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Aditya Sharma
>
>
>
> On
/* be
in the ofbiz-framework repository at all? I assume they are downloaded from
NPM during the build process.
--
Daniel Watford
+ '--add-exports=java.base/sun.util.calendar=ALL-UNNAMED', // OFBIZ-12721
> > +'--add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED' // OFBIZ-12726
> > +]
> >
> > To release w/o the workarounds it is enough to remove the 2
> "ALL-UNNAMED" lines.
> >
> > It also would be great to freeze a 23.01 branch and use it as next demos
> while replacing the 18.12 by 22.01 as stable.
> >
> > Looking forward for opinions...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jacques
>
--
Daniel Watford
ground/history to why a particular approach, workaround or
compromise might have been implemented would be really helpful.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
ted.
--
Daniel Watford
; Not yet, but it should be "soon" (ie in few weeks), hopefully using JDK 17
> and Gradle 7.6...
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 16/12/2022 à 10:12, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases
> for
> >
Hello,
The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
18.12.
Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
downloadable from the ofbiz website?
Thanks,
Dan
--
Daniel Watford
https://watfordconsulting.com
<https://protect-eu.mimecast.
m 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK
> 17 without any problems.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For that, we have OF
> trying to compile the code using openjdk-17 (but I am not using it), and as
> I mentioned when trying to "Preview" the push of the HEAD.
>
> Anyone have had a similar issue or have some suggestions regarding it?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Giulio
>
>
>
> --
> Giulio Speri
>
>
> *Mp Styl**e Srl*
> via Antonio Meucci, 37
> 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO)
> T 059/684916
> M 347/0965506
>
> www.mpstyle.it
>
--
Daniel Watford
nt me to an example in the existing code base that I can use
> as a reference model.
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Ernest
>
--
Daniel Watford
/54c39963-3980-4ba9-be6e-0c016cdb3...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=mailto%3Adouglas.melo98%40hotmail.com=ZGV2QG9mYml6LmFwYWNoZS5vcmc%3D
> )
> +55 28 99955-2528 (tel:+55%2028%2099955-2528)
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
>>>>>> (no plugins yet) Codenarc, and that the build is successful under
> java
> >>>>>> 17.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517#issuecomment-1398487745
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I tried to isolate rule fixes in separated commits, there are a lot
> (133
> >>>>>> commits), with some redundancy. But rebasing is not easy since
> files are
> >>>>>> modified by several rule fixing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Integration and unit test are ok. I did some manual testing when I
> got
> >>>>>> some doubt, but it could be nice to have some more eyes on the
> subject.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After reviewing process, and if everything is fine, should we commit
> >>>>>> that as a big squash ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WDYT
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Gil
>
--
Daniel Watford
955-2528)
>
> On Jan 26 2023, at 4:04 am, Daniel Watford wrote:
> > Hi Douglas,
> >
> > There isn't normally a single HTML file. Instead, OFBiz pages are
> rendered
> > by combining a number of elements.
> >
> > If you let us know which page you want to alter
You might also find this page useful: ofbiz-framework/themes.adoc at trunk
· apache/ofbiz-framework (github.com)
<https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/trunk/themes/docs/themes.adoc>
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 19:19, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> I think yo
Thanks all - I appreciate the invitation and am happy to be here :)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 16:33, gil.portenseigne
wrote:
> Welcome Daniel, and Congrats !
>
> Gil
> On 28/01/23 11:57, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> > The OFBiz PMC has invited Daniel Watford as a new PMC member a
t; >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 26/01/23 07:48, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In "Files changed" tab*, when you select a file, the "Review
> changes" button allows you to comment, approve or request changes on this
> file.
> > > > > > I guess "approve" is what you are looking for?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517/files
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le 26/01/2023 à 17:26, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > > > > > > Does anyone know of a way in a GitHub PR that a reviewer can
> mark an
> > > > > > > individual file as reviewed-and-passed so that other reviewers
> can skip
> > > > > > > that file?
>
--
Daniel Watford
Turns out I was able to import the list of files into Excel and copy and
paste the table from Excel to Confluence.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 08:37, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Gil,
>
> I don't think a checklist is quite enough, assuming we want to track the
> status of each file review
> > > I wonders the same, the "Review changes" do not seems to
> concern
> > > > one
> > > > > > > > file but the whole pull request, there is a review checkbox,
> but it
> > > > > > > > seems to be personal, i checked the first o
ecurity issue, and an error is added to the service return.
>
> This causes us some questions and issues, with the example string above,
> and more specifically the `\r` string.
> Because the `StringEscapeUtils.unescapeEcmaScript()` parses the `\r`
> string as the **line break charac
t things fully
specified if possible.
Therefore, do we have a general rule on whether thruDates in OFBiz are
inclusive or exclusive of the thruDate value itself? Or does the
inclusivity of the thruDate depend on context?
Thanks for reading :)
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
] https://lists.apache.org/thread/njg7fgwxjxt1vsfs6df8rrwvyp5pwv9p
[2] https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
--
Daniel Watford
vclass.com/2023/03/15/docker-to-users-of-free-team-orgs-one-month-to-pay-up-or-we-freeze-account-and-images-go/
>
> This looks like things that happened in the past with other "free"
> "organisations" (if it's free your are the product, don't do evil, etc.)
>
> Jacq
in the container. There is no dependency on the
JDK installed globally on the host.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
