Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Hi Ingo, Your message has been moderated. Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client. See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html. Thanks Jacques Le 31/01/2020 à 15:12, Ingo Könemann a écrit : -1 Ingo Könemann
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Hi Ulrich , Your message has been moderated. Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client. See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html. Thanks Jacques Le 31/01/2020 à 15:13, Ulrich Heidfeld a écrit : -1 Ulrich Heidfeld
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Ulrich Heidfeld
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Ingo Könemann
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Dennis Balkir Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
+1 Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 11:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 -- Thanks & Regards Pawan Verma Technical Consultant *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:30 PM Benjamin Jugl wrote: > -1 > > Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > > Hi, > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about > > the next to be released package > > > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would > > prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > > > Vote: > > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so > > this vote will be only open for a week. > > > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is > > another process documented at > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > > > > > Thank you for your attention > > > > Jacques > > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Best regards, Swapnil M Mane, ofbiz.apache.org On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:57 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Thanks and Regards, Aditya Sharma On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:02 PM James Yong wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > James > > On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the > next to be > > released package > > > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > > > Vote: > > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week. > > > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is > another process documented at > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > > > Thank you for your attention > > > > Jacques > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
+1 Regards, James On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to > bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote > will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Best Regards, Suraj Khurana SENIOR TECHNICAL CONSULTANT On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 1:34 PM Deepak Dixit wrote: > -1 > > Kind Regards, > Deepak Dixit > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 10:24 PM Martin Becker > wrote: > > > -1 > > > > Martin Becker > > > > > > > > > > On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > Hi,> > > > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the > > next to be > > > > released package> > > > > > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would > prefer > > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.> > > > > > > Vote:> > > > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.> > > > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18> > > > > > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so > this > > vote will be only open for a week.> > > > > > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is > > another process documented at> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your attention> > > > > > > Jacques> > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Kind Regards, Deepak Dixit On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 10:24 PM Martin Becker wrote: > -1 > > Martin Becker > > > > > On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi,> > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the > next to be > > > released package> > > > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.> > > > > Vote:> > > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.> > > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18> > > > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week.> > > > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is > another process documented at> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz> > > > > > Thank you for your attention> > > > > Jacques> > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Martin Becker On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi,> > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > > released package> > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to > bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.> > > Vote:> > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.> > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18> > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote > will be only open for a week.> > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz> > > > Thank you for your attention> > > Jacques> >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Jacques Le Roux writes: > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 +1 -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
+1 Thanks Paul Foxworthy On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 21:27, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > > -- Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd PO Box 2773 Cheltenham Vic 3192 Australia Phone: +61 3 9585 6788 Web: http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ Email: i...@coherentsoftware.com.au
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
0 Jacopo On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > >
Re: Polluting the vote thread, was: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Sure, just that Taher started with "I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch." and I wanted to explain more my perspective. OK the buck stop here :) Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 17:57, Michael Brohl a écrit : Could you please stop discussing inside the vote thread itself? Firstly, we discussed beforehand and the vote should be held on base of that discussion. If more infomation is added we might even have to cancel the vote again because participants who already voted had another base of information. Secondly, it is rather difficult to follow to see the real vote results. Thanks Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 24.01.20 um 17:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git. I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons? Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Taher, Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;) As I said to Nicolas: <> Let's see what the future will tell us... Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : -1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne wrote: +1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
Re: Polluting the vote thread, was: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Could you please stop discussing inside the vote thread itself? Firstly, we discussed beforehand and the vote should be held on base of that discussion. If more infomation is added we might even have to cancel the vote again because participants who already voted had another base of information. Secondly, it is rather difficult to follow to see the real vote results. Thanks Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 24.01.20 um 17:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git. I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons? Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Taher, Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;) As I said to Nicolas: <surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18. [...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be done... >> Let's see what the future will tell us... Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : -1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne wrote: +1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git. I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons? Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Taher, Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;) As I said to Nicolas: <> Let's see what the future will tell us... Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : -1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne wrote: +1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Hi Taher, Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;) As I said to Nicolas: <> Let's see what the future will tell us... Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : -1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne wrote: +1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We > > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > > released package > > > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > > > Vote: > > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week. > > > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is > another process documented at > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > > > Thank you for your attention > > > > Jacques > > >
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
+1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to > bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote > will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Nicolas On 24/01/2020 11:27, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about > the next to be released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would > prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so > this vote will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is > another process documented at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > > pEpkey.asc Description: application/pgp-keys
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
-1 Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
+1 Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges) since 2008* Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. > > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 > > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this > vote will be only open for a week. > > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another > process documented at > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz > > Thank you for your attention > > Jacques > >
[VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead. Vote: [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18 We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week. Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz Thank you for your attention Jacques
