Hi Ingo,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client.
See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 31/01/2020 à 15:12, Ingo Könemann a écrit :
-1
Ingo Könemann
Hi Ulrich ,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client.
See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 31/01/2020 à 15:13, Ulrich Heidfeld a écrit :
-1
Ulrich Heidfeld
-1
Ulrich Heidfeld
-1
Ingo Könemann
, some would
prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
this vote will be only open for a week.
Note
would prefer to
bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote
will be only open for a week.
Note
R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about
> > the next to be released package
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> > prefer to bypa
prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
this vote will be only open for a week.
Note that it's
ink about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before
support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the
> next to be
> > released package
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
> >
> > Vote:
>
to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to
> bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss
gt; > next to be >
> > > released package>
> > >
> > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> prefer
> > to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.>
> > >
> > > Vote:>
> >
> support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the
> next to be >
> > released package>
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.>
> &
me would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to
> bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.>
>
> Vote:>
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.>
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18>
>
> We h
Jacques Le Roux writes:
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
+1
--
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
uld prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss wi
ackage
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already
t release but we need to think about the next to be
released package
Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before relea
se but we need to think about the next
to be
released package
Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
prefer
to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R1
easing R18, some would prefer
to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
vote will be only open for a week.
leased package
Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without re
nd of
> support. We
> > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> > released package
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
> >
to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to
> bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss
before releasing R18, some would
> prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, s
to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
this vote
expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 in
Hi,
R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
released package
Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to
bypass R17 release and directly publish R18
27 matches
Mail list logo
