Please check Paul's answer :)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> ok... should be the right address... I keep this browser-tab open... ;-)
>
>
> Am 08.01.2016 um 15:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
>> done:
OK, great :)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> as far as I can see he also mean, that there is something wrong if one
> uses ParNewGC. G1GC is the upcomming default GC, as far as I understood. I
> think it is worth to test it at least if it is
Hi Maxim,
as far as I can see he also mean, that there is something wrong if one
uses ParNewGC. G1GC is the upcomming default GC, as far as I understood.
I think it is worth to test it at least if it is recommended to use
java 9...
For now I think it is "fixed"... Thanks for your help.
done: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/red5interest/uYwN_F1HmDQ
please feel free to comment :)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> by now OpenJDK 7. With Java 8 it could be worth to test G1GC. By now I'm
> not sure, how to test it under have
ok... should be the right address... I keep this browser-tab open... ;-)
Am 08.01.2016 um 15:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
done: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/red5interest/uYwN_F1HmDQ
please feel free to comment :)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
Hi
Hi Maxim,
you are right... "Väterchen Frost" is coming today... ;-) Then have a
nice party and a lot of gifts.. ;-)
Probably someone could check highperf settings? If it doesn't work, it
shouldn't be shipped in that way...
Am 07.01.2016 um 13:05 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
Hello Peter,
Actually this file is part of red5 distribution, I'll try to propose your
options as default ones.
BTW what java are you using?
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Jan 7, 2016 20:22, "Peter Dähn" wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> you are right... "Väterchen Frost" is coming
Hello Maxim,
thanks for that hint. I will try this one also. Currently I still try to
figure out whats going on...
BR Peter
Am 15.12.2015 um 07:53 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
sorry for the late response
I believe "Rejected message" are not good as well as WARN from
DeadLockScheduler
it seems
I can switch 3.1.0 to red5 1.0.7 maybe it will work better :)
please let me know if you are interested
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> thanks for that hint. I will try this one also. Currently I still try to
> figure out whats going on...
>
>
sorry for the late response
I believe "Rejected message" are not good as well as WARN from
DeadLockScheduler
it seems red5 was unable to process messages on good speed
you might try to tweek red5.properties to optimize it
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> Hi
Hi Maxim,
thank you for your response.
I will try to figure out, what went wrong. Use a different (test) system
might work, but at least I will have problems to produce a kind of traffic.
Unfortunately I don't know how to reproduce these error... Might be
traffic, might be configuration...
11 matches
Mail list logo