Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-17 Thread Irina Arkhipets
Hi Alexei, FYI - I've added a post about the browser problems resolving in here: http://opensourcewebconferencing.blogspot.ru/2013/03/how-to-debug-crashes-in-firefox.html FAQ also contains this link now. Best regards, Irina. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Alexei Fedotov

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread seba.wag...@gmail.com
No there is no such conversion. You have to rewrite the LZX to MXML and AS3 files. What about the Video Codec? I don't think it makes sense to start a RC2 vote before this issue has been further analyzed. Is there a given restriction that needs h264? Sebastian 2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Maybe we can add conversion task to the GSOC ideas? do we need it? I don't see any problems with h264 I'm going to build 1) SWF11 with h264 support removed 2) SWF11 with different h264 profile 3) SWF10 and compare but i'm not expecting any major differences :( On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:17

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread seba.wag...@gmail.com
You can simply disable h264 and build to swf11. It is only about the codec not about SWF formats. I just compared and could not really find out if there are big differences. However it is definitly good to really compare the impacts on CPU and bandwidth usage when switching the Codec for video

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
@Alexey we currently using openlaszlo for video (not sure what do you mean by AS3). Currently our version of video components is built using flex.4.6.1 while actual version available for download is flex 4.9.1. I was hoping we will have less bugs and better performance if we will use MXML directly

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
@Alexey we currently using flex 4.5.0, 4.6.1 to create bytecode can be inspected/used means autoconverted :) action script instead of openlaszlo is also good :) can you please tell me how this can be inspected? @Sebastian I thought we use only view/label/dataset/connection in our swf10 code

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Alexei Fedotov
The files appear in some temporary directory. I cannot remember where they are exactly. If you make an error when embedding action script into openlaszlo (should be something on action script level, xml markup would break the preprocessor itself), you get in the error message an exact pointer to

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread seba.wag...@gmail.com
Sorry but that is useless. The AS3 code that OpenLaszlo compiles is not human readable. It is generated into some tmp directory. You can search on your disc for a file called LZC_COMPILER_OPTIONS That should be into the same directory as the actual AS3 files. The thing is that there are of course

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread seba.wag...@gmail.com
just for consideration, attached is the current AS3 that OpenLaszlo generates. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/27836308/lzswf9.tar.gz Sebastian 2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.com I thought maybe it will be simple to convert swf10 folder of our sources +

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
that is definitely something not readable :( I can see the word static in the generated code :) this is global variables :))) On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:57 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: just for consideration, attached is the current AS3 that OpenLaszlo generates.

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Irina Arkhipets
Hi All, I investigated flash plugin crashes today and would like to share some results. First of all, crash happens both with SWF10 and SWF 11. It seems like the problem is reproducible with H263, H264 1.2 and H264 5.1. Actually, I haven't noticed significant CPU usage degradation for H264 in

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread Alexei Fedotov
Great job, Irina! Thanks for digging this out. -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Irina Arkhipets irina.arkhip...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I investigated flash plugin crashes

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-13 Thread seba.wag...@gmail.com
I think the issue has been reviewed. So we can be sure that the codec change in the codec is not an issue. Maybe we can debug the crashes a bit more before we start the vote. @Irina Thanks for the Tests! Can you please check those questions A) What OS and flash player Version and browser was

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-12 Thread seba.wag...@gmail.com
h264 simply needs more computing time. AEC also is enabled (which needs some percentages more CPU power then the previous implementation). Switching to later Flex SDK is surely desirable but basically the performance is a Flash Player/VirtualMachine issue not a Flash Compiler issue. So as long as

Fwd: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-12 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
-- Forwarded message -- From: Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM Subject: Re: SWF11 components performance/stability To: seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-559 @Irina can

Re: SWF11 components performance/stability

2013-03-12 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
@Sebastian, maybe you know, is there any possibility to automatically/semi-automatically convert our swf10 sources to apache flex xml? Since Openlaszlo seems to be not actively developed and flex is now part of Apache, maybe we can benefit from such conversion? On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:28 PM,