Not exactly. You would create a new NER model to replace yours.
In this approach you would need a corpus like this:
Pierre Vinken , 61 years old , will join the board
as a nonexecutive director Nov. 29 .
Mr . Vinken is chairman of Elsevier N.V. , the
Dutch publishing group . Jessie Robson i
Hi William,
Ok, so you are talking about a kind of pipe where we execute:
1. NER (personM for example)
2. Regex (filter to reduce false positives)
3. Plain dictionary (filter as above) ?
Yes we can split out model in two for M and F, it is not a big problem, we
have a database grouped by gender.
Do you plan to use the surrounding context? If yes, maybe you could try to
split NER in two categories: PersonM and PersonF. Just an idea, never read
or tried anything like it. You would need a training corpus with these
classes.
You could add both the plain dictionary and the regex as NER feature
Hello everybody,
we built a NER model to find persons (name) inside our documents.
We are looking for the best approach to understand if the name is
male/female.
Possible solutions:
- Plain dictionary?
- Regex to check the initial and/letters of the name?
- Classifier? (naive bayes? Maxent?)
Tha
Thanks check out http://github.com/SciSpark/scispark
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop:
I had briefly looked into it a while ago, would be nice to collaborate
there.
Tommaso
Il giorno mar 28 giu 2016 alle 23:26 Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> ha scritto:
> Yep I think so - you may also look at SciSpark
> http://scispark.jpl.nasa.gov
> where we are using D
Thank you for pointing, Prof. Chris. Can you please point me the exact
project at http://scispark.jpl.nasa.gov/ I should look at? It is huge.
Thank you again.
William
William Colen
2016-06-28 18:26 GMT-03:00 Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>:
> Yep I think so - you may a
Suneel,
I mean an implementation so we can use DL4J to train the OpenNLP models,
just like we already do in opennlp.tools.ml package with Maxent,
Perceptron, NayveBayes. I think it was Jörn who also did a few others that
are in the SandBox: Mallet and Mahout.
Thank you!
William
2016-06-28 18:27
Are u looking at using ND4J (from Deeplearning4j project) as the Math backend
for ML work? If so, yes.
From: William Colen
To: "dev@opennlp.apache.org"
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:23 PM
Subject: DeepLearning4J as a ML for OpenNLP
Hi,
Do you think it would be possible to imple
Thanks William, this is a great idea. I will discuss it with
Anastasija tomorrow.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pas
Yep I think so - you may also look at SciSpark http://scispark.jpl.nasa.gov
where we are using DL4J/ND4J and Breeze interchangeably here.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Sys
Hi,
Do you think it would be possible to implement a ML based on DL4J?
http://deeplearning4j.org/
Thank you
William
Hi,
I tried your code. Very good work so far! Congratulations.
Is the examples/result file corrupted? It has only one line.
Do you plan to implement a simple CLI to use it interactively from command
line, similar to
bin/opennlp Doccat
bin/opennlp TokenNameFinder
?
Also, do you plan to add eva
You can also activate the monitor from command line, using misclassified
and detailedF:
bin/opennlp TokenNameFinderCrossValidator
Usage: opennlp
TokenNameFinderCrossValidator[.ontonotes|.bionlp2004|.conll03|.conll02|.ad|.evalita|.muc6|.brat]
[-factory factoryName] [-resources resourcesDir] [-type
https://opennlp.apache.org/documentation/1.6.0/manual/opennlp.html#tools.namefind.training.featuregen
Do you have a specific question?
You can try the default feature generator and check how your model will
perform in terms of precision and recall. You can take a look at the kind
of errors (use a
15 matches
Mail list logo