Am 22.06.2013 00:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
> In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
>
> "So one solution discussed was to do similar to what we do with the
> main English pages with winPenPack. We have a general page for 3rd
> party ports and distributions:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/po
Hello,
I wanted to convert an XInputStream into java.io.InputStream.
I found this on the mail archive.
http://markmail.org/message/fo2txhbgxu3ksnct
This is a very old mail.
So, just asking if such a conversion api has been defined now.
What is the best way to do this conversion?
--
Rajath S,
M
Hi,
2013/6/22, RGB ES :
> 2013/6/21 RGB ES
>
>> I did not reported this yet.
>>
>> Download this document
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt
>>
>> On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a
>> comment
>> inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text
I am getting error ( accessing your personal settings or your Personal
settings are blocked. I am operating windows 7. Can you tel me how to
correct this error.
Thank you
wc...@att.net
615 459-7924
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>
>> I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
>> page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
>> directly. That is my understanding, at l
2013/6/21 RGB ES
> I did not reported this yet.
>
> Download this document
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt
>
> On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment
> inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor
> jumps to the he
I did not reported this yet.
Download this document
http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt
On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment
inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor
jumps to the heading instead of remaining where y
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
> page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
> directly. That is my understanding, at least.
>
> It could say, for example, "PrOOo Box now release
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> My recollection of the discussion was.
>
> (1) Have a 3rd party page.
>
> (2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page.
>
> (3) Each language can have their own news feed.
>
> (4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page.
>
> C
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 11.06.2013 12:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just want to mention issue 122331 [1].
>> It is about a missing logo/image in the first visible dialog on the
>> Windows installation.
>>
>> [1] https://i
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Piotr Bala wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm Piotr and at this time I help to develop the german AOO Website.
> I have contributed some changes that Jörg and I talked about in the german
> mailing list.
>
> So if you have any question to me, i am now on the inter
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:28:08 -0600
Kristen Todd wrote:
> Hi! Can you help me change the language of the entire office program? i
> just bought this used computer and its all in Spanish
>
> Thank you,
>
> Kristen
Download the appropriate Language Pack from
http://www.openoffice.org/download
Hi! Can you help me change the language of the entire office program? i
just bought this used computer and its all in Spanish
Thank you,
Kristen
> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> Someone is responsible for the box and it semms to me, it's
> not the ASF.
> So we have to make clear, who's the legal entity distributing the box
> (even it's a gift).
The legal entity is, in this case, formally an group
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
>
>> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drastic
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>>
>>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box
Am 21.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
>
>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>
>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
>> product of the
>> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>
>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
>> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Of
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > In case you are not following the discussion on the dev list, Juergen,
> > the 4.0 Release Manager, has proposed an endgame schedule for the AOO
> > 4.0 release:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archi
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
>
>> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?*
>>
>> As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must
>> be hosted by
>> Apache infrastructure(*),
>
> If th
> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>
> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
> product of the
> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
No, that's not right!
> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?*
>
> As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must
> be hosted by
> Apache infrastructure(*),
If the Apache to want that's OK.
But please check it out my prob
2013/6/21 Rob Weir
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
> >
> > I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
> > ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutsch
Hello everybody!
I'm Piotr and at this time I help to develop the german AOO Website.
I have contributed some changes that Jörg and I talked about in the german
mailing list.
So if you have any question to me, i am now on the international developer
mailing list.
greetings
Piotr
---
Thank you, i did it, I've been kind of busy at my job, but this weekend i'm
going to be working in the project
El jun 14, 2013 11:01 PM, "Raphael Bircher" escribió:
> Hi
>
> Am 15.06.13 05:43, schrieb Ivan Fuentes:
>
>> I know i followed all the instructuctions...I could fix that error,
>> No
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>
> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
>
> But on the other han
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>>
>>
What is the problem?
>>>
>>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>>> and approved for r
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>> > What is the problem?
>> >
>>
>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>> and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
>> The
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
But on the other hand the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.." isn't
any old third
On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
The website says it is from "Verein
Hello,
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > What is the problem?
> >
>
> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
> and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
> The website says it is from "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.
We've published a security bulletin and patch for the Apache
OpenOffice 3.4.1 SDK.
Due to a flaw in JavaDoc generated API documentation, one of the files
in the 3.4.1 SDK is vulnerable to an HTML frame injection attack.
Details on the issue, and a patched HTML file, can be found here:
http://www
Hi All,
We wrap up the AOO 4.0 Full Regression test this week, here is the weekly
update (6/17 - 6/21):
*Test execution:*
1. Testing of silent installation on Windows, it is passed in WinXP while
failed in Win7
Bug 122560 - msiexec installation only possible with parameter "/i"
2. Full/Final Re
2013/6/21 Andre Fischer
> On 20.06.2013 21:33, RGB ES wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/20 Rob Weir
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, RGB ES wrote:
>>>
2013/6/20 Hagar Delest
Confirmed on:
> AOO400m1(Build:9700)
> 2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64
>
>
On 20.06.2013 17:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 06.06.2013 13:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to
be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release
blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
>> Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-we
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann has canceled fanyuz...@gmail.com's
request for 4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 122435: CRASH at first launch
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122435
--- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
I could not reproduce the defect in current snapshot - AOO4
j...@apache.org has granted fanyuz...@gmail.com's request for
4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 121880: Find and Replace fails unless case is matched
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121880
--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
set showstopper flag
--
On 20.06.2013 17:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 06.06.2013 13:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to
be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release
blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field
Hello Juergen,
the decription of "insert" some what makes it clear:
This command inserts a new content. It commits the process of
// creating a new content via executing the command "createNewContent"
// and initializing it via setting properties, afterwards.
// The command is not called on th
Hello Juergen,
If I have to create new content, where do I obtain the properties of the
content. InsertCommandArgument2 has no attribute to store the content
Properties.
For example to insert a folder - what is its "Title" ?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/13
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Yes.
please allow to share the following objections:
1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated
I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a
priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a
Hello Rob,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
> Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Jörg Schmidt
>
Hi,
On 11.06.2013 12:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I just want to mention issue 122331 [1].
It is about a missing logo/image in the first visible dialog on the
Windows installation.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122331
Best regards, Oliver.
On 11.06.2013 10:38, Jü
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Yes.
please allow to share the following objections:
1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated
I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a
priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a
On 6/21/13 9:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
>> Hello Juergen,
>>
>> I mean if "getPropertyValues" is requested for non-existing content what is
>> the exception that must be thrown?
>
> I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't
Hi,
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Yes. please allow to share the following objections: 1. in general,
bugs shouldn't be rated
I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a
priority. And as always you can't fix them all w
On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
> Hello Juergen,
>
> I mean if "getPropertyValues" is requested for non-existing content what is
> the exception that must be thrown?
I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't
remember for sure...
But the UCP handles or commu
Hello Juergen,
I mean if "getPropertyValues" is requested for non-existing content what is
the exception that must be thrown?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The explanation for "insert" command is not cl
On 20.06.2013 21:04, RGB ES wrote:
2013/6/20 Hagar Delest
Confirmed on:
AOO400m1(Build:9700)
2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64
NB: same with the Find toolbar.
Indeed. I filled this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122567
This is a really problematic
On 20.06.2013 22:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
RGB ES wrote:
2013/6/20 FR web forum
https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192
Is it correct?
AFAIK, several icons on the sidebar comes from Symphony's sidebar. Maybe
the path just reflects the picture origin.
Indeed. I
51 matches
Mail list logo
