On 08/12/14 20:15, jan i wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
We had a signing mechanism in place for a long time and the reason why
we have currently no digital signing is the lack of a certificate where
we as project (PMC) or as representative the release manager have enough
control.
I do have a certificate and access key to the
On 09/12/14 09:17, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
We had a signing mechanism in place for a long time and the reason why
we have currently no digital signing is the lack of a certificate where
we as project (PMC) or as representative the release manager have enough
control.
I
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/12/14 09:17, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
We had a signing mechanism in place for a long time and the reason why
we have currently no digital signing is the lack of a certificate where
we as
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/12/14 20:15, jan i wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
javascript:; wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de javascript:; wrote:
Am 12/08/2014
A common complaint on the Forum is that OO does not see, or if it sees, does
not print to, an existing printer. There are numerous examples of this and I
can extract a list of threads if necessary. Might the interface between a 32
bit OO and a 64 bit Windows OS require some reconsideration
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:15:58 +
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
A common complaint on the Forum is that OO does not see, or if it sees, does
not print to, an existing printer. There are numerous examples of this and I
can extract a list of threads if necessary. Might the
Hello Sir/Miss, I'm really want to build openoffice, and program it in win
8.1 system metro.But I encountered a problem is :
/tmp/aoo-4.1.1/main/solenv/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/dmake-4.12/path.c:321：对‘cygwin_conv_to_posix_path’未定义的引用
See today: http://hpics.li/5e52083
This ad go to h**p://maribiz.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Andrea,
Although I consider this very important, I am so far back the learning curve on
working with the actual bits that I don't think I can provide anything
competent in a short time. If you think there is an useful way for me to move
along the curve in time to be useful, I am open to it.
Not technically broken per say in the notion of won't actually
connect to the .exe file, but Chrome keeps registering all of the Open
Office downloads as malicious. Even past versions.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 9 December 2014 at 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
Andrea,
Although I consider this very important, I am so far back the learning
curve on working with the actual bits that I don't think I can provide
anything competent in a short time. If you think there is an
Hi
FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by the
infra Contractors.
Time to find somebody, that will install the AOO specific buildbot parts.
rgds
jan i.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check.
Thinking out loud:
There are two cases of signatures.
1. Digital signing of installable components, such as DLLs and such. This
is
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found message
from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be amended to say
something like OpenOffice needs a 32 bit Java, which has not been found on
this machine.
Many Windows users know they have Java installed and
Hi,
is that OO does not see, or if it sees, does not print to, an existing
printer.
please see my issue 99074:
changing windows default printer not reflected in open document
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Regards
Oliver
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:16:54 +0100
Oliver Brinzing oliver.brinz...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
is that OO does not see, or if it sees, does not print to, an existing
printer.
please see my issue 99074:
changing windows default printer not reflected in open document
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be
amended to say something like OpenOffice needs a 32 bit Java, which
has not been found on this machine.
Am 12/09/2014 04:29 PM, schrieb Elizabeth Morgan:
Not technically broken per say in the notion of won't actually
connect to the .exe file, but Chrome keeps registering all of the Open
Office downloads as malicious. Even past versions.
please make sure that you download only from the official
The downloads ARE the ones from sourceforge. That's specifically why I'm
reporting it.
Steps to problem:
go to openoffice.org/download
select download
get redirect to Sourceforge
get file to download
Once file downloaded, chrome deemed it malicious
On 12/9/2014 1:37 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am
UPDATE:
It's my entire development team that's encountering the issue at the
moment -- we're having to refit a good number of computers, and all of
them are detecting it as malicious after downloading from Sourceforge
via official link from openoffice.org
On 12/9/2014 1:37 PM, Marcus wrote:
Elizabeth,
Have you filed an issue on this matter?
louis
On 09 Dec2014, at 14:48, Elizabeth Morgan elizabethallynmor...@gmail.com
wrote:
UPDATE:
It's my entire development team that's encountering the issue at the moment
-- we're having to refit a good number of computers, and all of
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:48:44 -0600
Elizabeth Morgan elizabethallynmor...@gmail.com wrote:
UPDATE:
It's my entire development team that's encountering the issue at the
moment -- we're having to refit a good number of computers, and all of
them are detecting it as malicious after downloading
Hi
On 09 Dec2014, at 15:11, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:48:44 -0600
Elizabeth Morgan elizabethallynmor...@gmail.com wrote:
UPDATE:
It's my entire development team that's encountering the issue at the
moment -- we're having to refit a good number of
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org javascript:; wrote:
I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check.
Thinking out loud:
There are two cases of signatures.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:14:24 -0500
Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 09 Dec2014, at 15:11, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:48:44 -0600
Elizabeth Morgan elizabethallynmor...@gmail.com wrote:
UPDATE:
It's my entire development team that's
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org javascript:; wrote:
I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check.
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be
amended to say something like OpenOffice needs a 32 bit Java, which
has not been found on
+1 (non-binding [;) on PMC approval of any slip-stream.
I don't understand why full rebuilds are required. The only crucial file that
needs signing is the .exe that is downloaded and extracts the actual setup
files. All it does is extract a number of fixed files and then run the
extracted
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be
amended to say something like OpenOffice
2014-12-09 21:23 GMT+01:00 Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:14:24 -0500
Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 09 Dec2014, at 15:11, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:48:44 -0600
Elizabeth Morgan
On 09 Dec2014, at 17:41, Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-12-09 21:23 GMT+01:00 Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:14:24 -0500
Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 09 Dec2014, at 15:11, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
+1 (non-binding [;) on PMC approval of any slip-stream.
I don't understand why full rebuilds are required. The only crucial file
that needs signing is the .exe that is downloaded and extracts the actual
setup
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 +
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a
Bezug nehmend auf mein Posting vom 19.11.2014 übersende ich beigefügt
die Email der Orga der Chemnitzr Linux-Tage mit der Bitte um Beachtung
der bekanntgemachten Deadlines.
Gruß
Michael
Original Message
Subject: [CLT-News] Adventsbegleiter und Anmeldetermine
Date: Tue, 09 Dec
36 matches
Mail list logo
