Re: Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"

2016-09-25 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Do we have a test build for MacOSX 64 bit? Then I will check it Mechtilde Am 25.09.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marcus: > Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >> What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ? > > IMHO Ariel should/could tell us what he

[DISCUSS] Draft 4.1.3 release notes

2016-09-25 Thread Patricia Shanahan
[Comments, suggestions, improvements welcome.] Release Notes for Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 General Remarks === Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 is a maintenance release incorporating security fixes, updated dictionaries, and build fixes. A 4.1.2 regression,

My Progress

2016-09-25 Thread Alexander Hart
I finished reading about how apache works.

My Progress

2016-09-25 Thread Alexander Hart
I am just starting level 1: How the apache openoffice project works

Re: Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ? IMHO Ariel should/could tell us what he has done with his Mac builds as the first positive verifications came with his builds [1]. I really hope he can. ;-)

Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"

2016-09-25 Thread Patricia Shanahan
What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ? Empirically, it does not reproduce in 4.1.3. Do we have a definite patch for it? Should I list it in the 4.1.3 release notes as having been fixed. - To

Re: Testing 4.1.3

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
Hi Dave, in a previous mail this month you have written that you are available for help in case of topics that belogs to Sourceforge. Actually we have now a case that needs to be worked on on your side. Like reported below they have a problem with redirected links from

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
Am 09/25/2016 07:11 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass

Re: 4.1.3 building

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
Am 09/25/2016 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/24/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/23/2016 10:18 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/23/2016 10:12 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 9/23/2016 1:00 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 09/23/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

2016-09-25 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request. More than that, the site looks

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

2016-09-25 Thread Simon Phipps
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct > control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request. More than that, the site looks like it has more than just the OP using it

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

2016-09-25 Thread Patricia Shanahan
We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request. On 9/25/2016 7:51 AM, Formsbirds wrote: Dear Webmaster, I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my site -

Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

2016-09-25 Thread Formsbirds
Dear Webmaster, I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my site - formsbirds.com or remove them completely. We found thousands of links pointed to our site from templates.openoffice.org. The links are under an account named susie...@yandex.com. This was

Testing 4.1.3

2016-09-25 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Bootstrap fails

2016-09-25 Thread Aleksandr Andreev
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > It's OK; I just asked because I haven't seen this error before on trunk; > it seems some Ubuntu specific problem > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags > there, it suggested to add -fno-stack-protector

Re: Bootstrap fails

2016-09-25 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:51:44AM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile" > wrote: > > > > > > This looks the build bot error: > > >

Re: Bootstrap fails

2016-09-25 Thread Aleksandr Andreev
Hello Ariel, On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile" wrote: > > > This looks the build bot error: > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt > > Are you building trunk or a branch? > I was trying to build

Re: Bootstrap fails

2016-09-25 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Aleksandr, On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:05:55PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > The build fails on Linux Mint 17.1 with the following messages: > > [ build LNK ] Library/passwordcontainer.uno.so > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS): In > function

Re: How do all the binaries get built?

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
Am 09/23/2016 08:41 PM, schrieb Jim Jagielski: Just a FYI that I now have 4 build VMs available that I will use: OSX 10.11/Xcode 7.3.1, Ubuntu 14.04/64bit, CentOS5.11/64bit and CentOS5.11/32bit. So far, successful builds on OSX and the 64bit Ubuntu and CentOS5 VMs; haven't tried the 32bit one

Re: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries

2016-09-25 Thread Marcus
I hope it's not too late. But it should be also a normal thing: Please take care that the naming structure for dirs and files is exactly the same like for the other 4.1.x releases. The only difference should be the version number. But what I've seen from the commits so far looks good.