Re: 4.1.3 building

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:45:02PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to > >QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. > > Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the

Re: Bootstrap fails

On 28 Sep, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:15:06PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. >> >> I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to

Re: 4.1.3 building

Marcus wrote: Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Possibly. But those files are generated during the build anyway, so the fact that RAT does not know about them is irrelevant. Sure, but the report is not green. But IMHO it should be green when we want to look at 4.1.3 as official

Re: Bootstrap fails

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:15:06PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened > >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > >> I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > >> a vm on the weekend. > >> > > >

Re: Bootstrap fails

Hello Aleksandr, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:00:09PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > > > > In theory, when linking the library. I opened > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139

Re: Bootstrap fails

On 28 Sep, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. >> I don't have a system to

Re: Test planning for 4.1.3

Hi Patricia, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:51:40AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I am currently thinking about testing, and test result collection, for > 4.1.3. > > Is there an OpenOffice QA person in the house? > > If so, I would like to let you take charge of organizing testing, and just >

4.1.3_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127140] Installer includes VC package older than 4.1.2

Patricia Shanahan has granted Pedro 's request for 4.1.3_release_blocker: Issue 127140: Installer includes VC package older than 4.1.2 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127140 - To

Re: 4.1.3 building

Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 25/09/2016 Marcus wrote: Finally I got a AOO 4.1.3 with release options - but only en-US. I used the following varaible + value in the build script: ... LANG="de en-US fr pt ja" the language option seems to be a problem with the build script:

Re: Testing 4.1.3

The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be uploaded exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release would do. You do have the option, if building yourself, of generating an archive that can be run without installing. On 9/28/2016 1:30 PM, Hagar Delest

Orientation, part 2

Hi, I have read the second orientation page with no questions or comments. Mark Aldrich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Introduction

Hi, Well, I have finished reading through the section titled "Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice". There are a couple of things which I need to point out to the webpage editor. Section 5 starts with "A useful shortcut notation you will often see on the lists.", which makes sense

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Thanks, up and running. BTW, I noticed that it installed over my 4.1.2. I don't remember if the RCs used to install in lieu of the production version in the past but it may be surprising for some users. Shouldn't it be installed in parallel (with no desktop-integration)? More hassle but if

Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

R. Mark Aldrich wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Mark Aldrich and my user name on Confluence is darklarchrim. May I > have edit permission to add my name to the list of volunteers? > > Mark > Mark; Your User Name darklarchrim has been white-listed on Confluence Regards Keith N. McKenna

[CWiki] Account Whitelisting

Hi, My name is Mark Aldrich and my user name on Confluence is darklarchrim. May I have edit permission to add my name to the list of volunteers? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Test planning for 4.1.3

I am currently thinking about testing, and test result collection, for 4.1.3. Is there an OpenOffice QA person in the house? If so, I would like to let you take charge of organizing testing, and just provide some suggestions.

Re: 4.1.3 building

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the best solution. If someone wants to build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload

Re: Bootstrap fails

Hello Ariel, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > In theory, when linking the library. I opened > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > a vm

Github mirror (Re: Bootstrap fails)

Gavin McDonald wrote: From: Andrea Pescetti https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11601 How long has it been broken? I opened the above issue in April 2016. Has infra been asked to fix it? In the issue I say that the Github mirror is broken and I ask if there is a way to fix it. I

Re: Hello

Welcome. I used to go to Beaverton quite often when I was working for FPS and its successors. We are currently testing a 4.1.3 release candidate. You can download many different binaries from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ On 9/27/2016 5:04 PM, R. Mark Aldrich

Re: Hello

Hello Mark, thank you for your offer and a heartly welcome. Regards Michael Duesseldorf, Rhine-Area, Germany Am 28.09.2016 um 02:04 schrieb R. Mark Aldrich: > Hi, > > My name is Mark Aldrich and I am planning on offering my help with > development. I live in Beaverton, Oregon, USA, a city

Re: entstellender Beitrag zu OpenOffice

> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > Mir war schon klar, dass Du das etwas weniger gelassen > siehst. Das kann > ich auch nachvollziehen. > > Ich habe das aber hier auch deshalb auf die Liste gepostet, > um ein paar > Argumente gegen den Artikel insgesamt

Hello

Hi, My name is Mark Aldrich and I am planning on offering my help with development. I live in Beaverton, Oregon, USA, a city just southwest of Portland. I think of myself as a software engineer because I have been writing code for over 40 years. In my spare time, I do woodworking. I am

Re: Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

Hello, Thank for your kind response. We prefer to re-enable our account susie...@yandex.com. Since you are busy with the new revision release, We will clean up the templates by ourselves. Please just recover the account. Thank you very much! Regards, Katie Williams On Tue, 27 Sep

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

To my honest opinion the template website is one big mess, over 23 thousand templates from which many are menu cards, price lists and store locators. I believe Google is the place to find this type of information. Templates should be templates and not an alternative to advertise products.