Re: English dictionary

2019-11-02 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 02.11.19 um 23:24 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 23:03:12 +0100 > Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Marco did update the English dictionary, but I think the page got >> unpublished again: >> >>

Re: English dictionary

2019-11-02 Thread Marco A.G. Pinto
Well, it happens every time and I am annoyed with it, so I just upload the .oxt and fill the fields. I no longer check if it works or not as I did all the correct procedures. On 02/11/2019 22:03, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > Marco did update the English dictionary, but I think the page

Re: English dictionary

2019-11-02 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 23:03:12 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > Marco did update the English dictionary, but I think the page got > unpublished again: > > https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice > > @Andrea: Can you fix it? ;-) > > Regards,

English dictionary

2019-11-02 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, Marco did update the English dictionary, but I think the page got unpublished again: https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice @Andrea: Can you fix it? ;-) Regards,    Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Ariel, Am 02.11.19 um 18:57 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Ariel, > > Am 02.11.19 um 18:49 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: >> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> On Windows the issue is that the Git() command checks out the data at a >>> position where cygwin does not see it.

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Bidouille
Update to Python 3 is reported as an issue since 2014: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123975 - Mail original - > De: "Don Lewis" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Samedi 2 Novembre 2019 19:09:17 > Objet: Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC > > On

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Ariel, > > Am 02.11.19 um 18:49 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: >> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> On Windows the issue is that the Git() command checks out the data at a >>> position where cygwin does not see it. >>> >>> On the other

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Nov, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Don, > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:06 PM Don Lewis wrote: >> nss really needs to be updated. Unfortunately very recent versions >> can't be built with some of the ancient compilers that we are stuck with >> (like the old version of Visual C++ that we

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Ariel, Am 02.11.19 um 18:49 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: >> On Windows the issue is that the Git() command checks out the data at a >> position where cygwin does not see it. >> >> On the other hand if I pass the command directly no

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > On Windows the issue is that the Git() command checks out the data at a > position where cygwin does not see it. > > On the other hand if I pass the command directly no checkout happens. It's always useful to see the logs:

Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9

2019-11-02 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Mechtilde, On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 11:49 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Ariel, > > I have 22 cores. What can be good values for build --all? It's just a question of doing maths: if I have 6 cores: -P3 -- -P2 = 3 modules in parallel, 2 jobs per module -P2 -- -P3 = 2 modules in parallel, 3

Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9

2019-11-02 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Ariel, I have 22 cores. What can be good values for build --all? Kind regards Mechtilde Am 02.11.19 um 15:11 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > Hi Mechtilde, > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 2:53 AM Mechtilde wrote: >>> I can sort of reproduce this, but with other modules, always if I >>>

Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9

2019-11-02 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Mechtilde, On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 2:53 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > I can sort of reproduce this, but with other modules, always if I > > build with a single process; I guess you are building with > > build --all > > yes I do so > > without the -P switch. > > I use build --all -P12 -- -P12 > > we

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > I fixed the git statements on Linux. However now perl moduls are > missing. I have asked infra to fix it. Maybe I miss some pointers. Last time I added packages via puppet (*), but things changed since then, I asked on the INFRA issue. Is

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Don, On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:06 PM Don Lewis wrote: > nss really needs to be updated. Unfortunately very recent versions > can't be built with some of the ancient compilers that we are stuck with > (like the old version of Visual C++ that we use for 32-bit Windows > builds), or at least not

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

2019-11-02 Thread Peter Kovacs
I fixed the git statements on Linux. However now perl moduls are missing. I have asked infra to fix it. Maybe I miss some pointers. On Windows the issue is that the Git() command checks out the data at a position where cygwin does not see it. On the other hand if I pass the command directly no