Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-26 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On 12/26/2020 4:19 PM, Marcus wrote: > The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: > > Arrigo Marchiori > > Please give him a warm welcome. :-) > > Marcus > (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC) Welcome and congratulations Arrigio. Regards Keith

Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Arrigo, Welcome! I promise we get some more of your PRs merged. ;-) Regards,    Matthias Am 26.12.20 um 22:19 schrieb Marcus: > The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: > > Arrigo Marchiori > > Please give him a warm welcome. :-) > > Marcus > (on behalf of

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 21:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I have uploaded a test build of en-US AOO419-dev for macOS. I have confirmed > on my macOS11/BigSur VM that this version opens docx files w/ no problems, > edits and saves them, etc... > > Please test: > >

New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-26 Thread Marcus
The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Arrigo Marchiori Please give him a warm welcome. :-) Marcus (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC) - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: bump rev to 4.1.9

2020-12-26 Thread Marcus
As Jim is bumping the version numbers for a new release. I know we have a script to increase the version number for a new build / release. And the 4.1.x releases up to now are a good proof that it works. However, when looking at the code I think there are too many places (5 different files

RE: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

2020-12-26 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2020 10:05 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does > AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?) > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 21:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I have uploaded a test build of en-US AOO419-dev for macOS. I have confirmed > on my macOS11/BigSur VM that this version opens docx files w/ no problems, > edits and saves them, etc... > > Please test: > >

RE: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

2020-12-26 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2020 3:18 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does > AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?) > > It is more than likely that we may need to release a 4.1.9 >

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
BUGZ seems to be a build issue, not a code one, but it still needs to be fixed and noted, likely with some autoconf checks that fakeroot exists. > On Dec 26, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> So there is for sure a bug

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
I have uploaded a test build of en-US AOO419-dev for macOS. I have confirmed on my macOS11/BigSur VM that this version opens docx files w/ no problems, edits and saves them, etc... Please test: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Cheers! > On Dec 26, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Rory O'Farrell

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:43:06 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS > > BigSur is > > unknown. It is this: > > > >> diff --git

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Marcus
Am 26.12.20 um 21:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS > BigSur is > unknown. It is this: > >> diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx >> b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: > diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f 100644 > ---

Big Sur 4.1.x core dumps

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've confirmed that my 4.2.0 builds work fine on BigSur but the 4.1.8 builds, even using Xcode10 and the 10.13SDK still result in core on macOS11. Below you'll find the stack. My initial thoughts are that it is NOT a build issue, but rather a code one, so I'll start some investigation with that

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
For me, the issue is whether it is, indeed, a code problem in 4.1.8 that requires fixes and thus a 4.1.9 release, or whether it is a *build* problem, that implies that building 4.1.8 with a newer SDK will resolve the problem. AFAICT, that question is still unresolved. What we DO know is that

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > It is more than likely that we may need to release a 4.1.9 just to > accommodate BigSur. However, AOO > is hardly unique in being an app that no longer works when someone upgrades > to BigSur. The macOS > community is replete w/ such apps.

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
It is more than likely that we may need to release a 4.1.9 just to accommodate BigSur. However, AOO is hardly unique in being an app that no longer works when someone upgrades to BigSur. The macOS community is replete w/ such apps. I'm not using that as an excuse, but that is what it is. > On