Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-25 Thread TJ Frazier
On 3/18/2013 03:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 3/17/13 11:27 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: ... I also noticed that when you zoom a text document the lines for redlining as well as for smarttags, etc. are not zoomed in the same way and makes it less visible. But this seems to be a general issue. Juergen

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-20 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/20/13 10:26 AM, Kai Labusch wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. März 2013, 07:34:17 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-20 Thread Kai Labusch
Am Freitag, 15. März 2013, 07:34:17 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > >> - a missing include of XInterface i

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-18 Thread TJ Frazier
Feel free to cross-link or add comments. /tj/ On 3/18/2013 03:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 3/17/13 11:27 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: ... I also noticed that when you zoom a text document the lines for redlining as well as for smarttags, etc. are

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-18 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/17/13 11:27 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: >> ... I also noticed that when you zoom a text document the lines for >> redlining as well as for smarttags, etc. are not zoomed in the same way >> and makes it less visible. But this seems to be a general issue. >> >> Juergen >> > Hi, Jürgen, > > This is on

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-17 Thread TJ Frazier
... I also noticed that when you zoom a text document the lines for redlining as well as for smarttags, etc. are not zoomed in the same way and makes it less visible. But this seems to be a general issue. Juergen Hi, Jürgen, This is one of my pet peeves. The major problem seems to be the line

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 01:09:45PM +0100, Kai Labusch wrote: > As a first step, it would be sufficient for our purposes, if the extension > could specify the color of a smart-tag. > > Would it reduce your concerns that the patches would give to much control to > the extension if we remove the po

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/15/13 1:09 PM, Kai Labusch wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. März 2013, 07:34:17 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Kai Labusch
Am Freitag, 15. März 2013, 07:34:17 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > >> - a missing include of XInterface i

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/15/13 11:34 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt >>> wrote: - a missing include of XInterface in the new IDL >>>

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> - a missing include of XInterface in the new IDL > >> XMarkingAccess.idl, IDL compile error on Mac, surprising

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/15/13 10:20 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> - a missing include of XInterface in the new IDL >> XMarkingAccess.idl, IDL compile error on Mac, surprising that it >> worked for you > > This is a bug, the one that removed the

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-15 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > - a missing include of XInterface in the new IDL XMarkingAccess.idl, IDL > compile error on Mac, surprising that it worked for you This is a bug, the one that removed the need for explicitly inheriting from XInterface should have ta

Re:Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-14 Thread Yi
Hi, What I mean isthatI would liketo participate in development of this extension At 2013-03-13 22:33:43,"Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: >On 3/13/13 3:04 PM, 2 wrote: >> Hi, this is a wonderful extension, I would like to take a look, how can I >> get it? > >you can't get the extension at the moment

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-13 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/13/13 3:04 PM, 2 wrote: > Hi, this is a wonderful extension, I would like to take a look, how can I > get it? you can't get the extension at the moment and it would not help you. The extension works only with a server backend and/or a valid account. And I think the extension is still under

Re:Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-13 Thread 2
Hi, this is a wonderful extension, I would like to take a look, how can I get it? 在 2013-03-13 21:30:26，"Jürgen Schmidt" 写道： >On 2/7/13 5:30 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 2/7/13 5:08 PM, Kai Labusch wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'm a colleague of Robert Barbey at Acrolinx and I'm working

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-03-13 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 2/7/13 5:30 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 2/7/13 5:08 PM, Kai Labusch wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm a colleague of Robert Barbey at Acrolinx and I'm working on the >> OpenOffice >> Writer integration of our client-server text-processing solution. >> Currently, we already have a working wri

Re: [Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-02-07 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 2/7/13 5:08 PM, Kai Labusch wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm a colleague of Robert Barbey at Acrolinx and I'm working on the > OpenOffice > Writer integration of our client-server text-processing solution. > Currently, we already have a working writer extension that has been > implemented in ja

[Call-for-Review] code changes for more powerful smarttag extensions

2013-02-07 Thread Kai Labusch
Hi everyone, I'm a colleague of Robert Barbey at Acrolinx and I'm working on the OpenOffice Writer integration of our client-server text-processing solution. Currently, we already have a working writer extension that has been implemented in java and provides the functionality we need. For the i