Hi Jan, hi Jürgen,
as I wrote, license headers in
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.classpath
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.project
main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.classpath
main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.project
are indeed missing. They were not
Hi.
Newest rat report still shows the same 6 files as being a problem.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
rgds
jan i.
On 18 June 2015 at 20:19, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for applying the patch.
I will check the next RAT-Scan to see if the files sill
HI.
did anybody note the rat-scan output, seems we have 6 files still that are
a problem (a probably should be deleted):
Unapproved Licenses:
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly-rat/build/main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
Thanks for applying the patch.
I will check the next RAT-Scan to see if the files sill appear.
rgds
jan I.
On 18 June 2015 at 19:36, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Jan,
jan i schrieb:
HI.
did anybody note the rat-scan output, seems we have 6 files still that are
a
Hi Jan,
jan i schrieb:
HI.
did anybody note the rat-scan output, seems we have 6 files still that are
a problem (a probably should be deleted):
Unapproved Licenses:
On 11/06/15 18:23, jan i wrote:
On 8 June 2015 at 16:58, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
is it OK to commit the patch?
if it not ok to commit the patch, then I wonder how the files was committed
in the first place.
If it is not ok, then the files should be
On 8 June 2015 at 16:58, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
is it OK to commit the patch?
if it not ok to commit the patch, then I wonder how the files was committed
in the first place.
If it is not ok, then the files should be deleted. We cannot have files in
trunk
Hi Jürgen,
is it OK to commit the patch?
Kind regards
Regina
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote:
On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
shows 30 files that need attention in
Hi All,
Following on from this then I decided to add License headers to all but two of
the
30 files, the remainder having entries in the rat-excludes file, so this patch
attached should clear up our RAT report as it stands.
Below is a svn st list of modified files and please find attached a
On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote:
On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding.
A quick look shows to me that we should probably
Hi All,
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding.
A quick look shows to me that we should probably insert ASF license Headers
in all of those
On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding.
A quick look shows to me that we should probably insert ASF license
Headers
in
12 matches
Mail list logo
