I bump this thread
I just created a saved search -- registered user -- with 4.1.x regressions:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=16namedcmd=4.1.x%20regressionsremaction=runsharer_id=7
Can we add a meta issue to listed most annoying bugs?
On 07/11/14 23:27, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 31/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125810
too late, now where I was aware of this request I did it already
Good, thanks!
Could at least you take screenshots
On 31/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125810
too late, now where I was aware of this request I did it already
Good, thanks!
Could at least you take screenshots while you import Sinhala? Then maybe
someone
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
[...]
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
[...]
2) Fixes for any critical bugs, especially any introduced in AOO
4.1.1. Do we know yet which bugs these are? Do we have a short list
of the most critical ones?
I know
On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 28/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Concrete example: http://markmail.org/message/usn5khq3imrdibzq Sinhala
(si) was requested two weeks ago and
On 10/29/2014 01:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 28/10/14 18:07, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
interest in working on
On 28/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Concrete example: http://markmail.org/message/usn5khq3imrdibzq Sinhala
(si) was requested two weeks ago and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/si/
hasn't been imported yet.
The natural
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
where nobody is working on? I don't get it.
That was an example, but still it is one
On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
where nobody is working on? I don't get
On 24/10/14 20:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release
I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release
and actually the two can work together really well.
I would like to streamline our processes and remove
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
where nobody is working on? I don't get it.
That was an example, but still it is one improvement that needs to be
done. Why?
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2) Fixes for any critical bugs,
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2)
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:00 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to
have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever
Am 10/24/2014 10:29 AM, schrieb RA Stehmann:
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1)
On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release
I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release
and actually the two can work together really well.
I would like to streamline our processes and remove bottlenecks and
dependencies on non-Apache systems.
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2) Fixes for any critical bugs, especially any introduced in AOO
4.1.1. Do we know
+1
I think a 4.1.2 would also be a good mentoring/training process for an
additional Release Manager or two.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 09:16
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2
A short
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2) Fixes for
21 matches
Mail list logo
