Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/22/13 12:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> Hi Jani, >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > something. > > If we

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Jani, > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > > > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > > > > something. > > > > > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Jani, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > > > something. > > > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > > > something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that > > > u

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
A - Mozilla Public > License) not being satisfied. This appears to be the rule rather than the > exception [;<). > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 11:29 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; > Subject

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On 21 April 2013 23:55, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote: > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something. > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > > something else to replace it (or have we

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote: > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something. > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that uses > libwpd?). answer in https://i

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On 21 April 2013 22:49, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell >> and libwpd? >> > > This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases > since it was LGPL-only when OpenOffice 3.4.0 w

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell and libwpd? This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases since it was LGPL-only when OpenOffice 3.4.0 was released), but I expect this to be the case if libwpd is n

RE: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
---Original Message- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 08:11 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; > Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton >wrote: > > >

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
gt; From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 08:11 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; > Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton >wrote: > > > Licensing issues have not be

RE: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 08:11 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Licensing issues have not been entirely removed, > <http://www.apache.org/legal/reso

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Licensing issues have not been entirely removed, > . > > Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very > specific restrictions. Having to build the code fr

RE: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed, . Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very specific restrictions. Having to build the code from source, especially with modifications, is problematic. - Dennis

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:25 AM, janI wrote: > On Apr 21, 2013 2:15 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti >wrote: > > > > > As you can see in > > > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/< > http://sourceforge.net/projects/l

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On Apr 21, 2013 2:15 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > As you can see in > > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/< http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/> > > http://sourceforge.net/**

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > As you can see in > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/ > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwps/files/libwps/**libwps-0.2.8/